Flow Foundation Seeks Court Order to Stop FLOW Token Delisting on South Korean Exchanges

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-09Last updated on 2026-03-09

Abstract

Flow Foundation and Dapper Labs have filed a legal request with the Seoul Central District Court to halt the planned delisting of the FLOW token from major South Korean exchanges, including Upbit and Coinone. The delisting decision followed a December 2025 security exploit on the Flow blockchain, where an attacker duplicated tokens worth approximately $3.9 million. Although user funds were unaffected and validators quickly paused the network, exchanges proceeded with the delisting. The Foundation argues that FLOW continues to trade normally on global platforms like Binance and Coinbase, indicating its viability. The legal action aims to protect Korean investors and allow for further review, highlighting growing tensions between blockchain projects and exchanges after security incidents.

Flow Foundation and Dapper Labs have filed a legal request with the Seoul Central District Court to stop the planned delisting of the FLOW token from the South Korean crypto exchanges. The firms are asking the court to temporarily suspend the decision by the exchanges, including Upbit and Coinone, that announced the end of trading support for the token.

Reason behind the Delisting

The decision to delist came after the security exploit in the Flow blockchain in December 2025. During the incident, an attacker exploited a protocol vulnerability and was able to duplicate the token worth about $3.9 million. Later reports confirmed that the users’ balances and funds were not affected. Validators on the network quickly took action by pausing the blockchain and working with the exchanges to freeze.

Developers discussed several possibilities for recovery options after the attack, and one proposal was a full blockchain rollback, which would restore the network to a previous state before the exploit occurred. Critics warned that the rollback could create problems such as duplicate balances for users who have moved assets out of the network and financial losses for users who transfer assets into the network during that time. Instead of rolling back the entire chain, they implemented an isolated recovery plan, which involved identifying and destroying only the duplicate token.

Flow Foundation argues that the token continues to trade normally on the major global platforms, which include Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken. The foundation maintains that this indicates the project’s continued viability and suggests a reconsideration of the delisting decisions.

In the court filing, Flow Foundation states that the request to suspend the delisting is intended to protect Korean users and investors while the situation is fully reviewed. The firm said that it remains open to discussions with the exchanges to continue pursuing additional listings within South Korea. This legal challenge for the Flow Foundation shows that the growing tension between the blockchain projects and crypto exchanges is following security incidents.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Wall Street Expert Warns of 35% Stock Crash Amid US-Iran War

TagsCryptocurrencyFLOW

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat legal action have Flow Foundation and Dapper Labs taken regarding the FLOW token delisting in South Korea?

AFlow Foundation and Dapper Labs have filed a legal request with the Seoul Central District Court to stop the planned delisting of the FLOW token and to temporarily suspend the decision by the exchanges.

QWhat was the primary reason cited by South Korean exchanges for delisting the FLOW token?

AThe decision to delist came after a security exploit in the Flow blockchain in December 2025, where an attacker exploited a protocol vulnerability and duplicated tokens worth about $3.9 million.

QWhat alternative recovery plan was implemented instead of a full blockchain rollback after the exploit?

AInstead of a full rollback, they implemented an isolated recovery plan which involved identifying and destroying only the duplicate tokens.

QOn which major global exchanges does the FLOW token continue to trade normally, according to the Flow Foundation?

AThe FLOW token continues to trade normally on major global platforms including Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken.

QWhat is the stated goal of the Flow Foundation's legal challenge to the delisting?

AThe goal is to protect Korean users and investors while the situation is fully reviewed, and the foundation remains open to discussions with the exchanges for additional listings in South Korea.

Related Reads

L2 'Recalibration': When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

The article discusses the evolving relationship between Ethereum's Layer 1 (L1) and Layer 2 (L2) solutions, moving beyond the initial "L2 for scaling" model. As Ethereum L1 itself scales (increasing Gas Limit, statelessness, zkEVM), the unique value proposition of L2s shifts from merely providing cheap execution to offering differentiated features like application-specific optimization, privacy, and flexible governance. The piece explores three key themes: 1. **L2's New Role:** L2s are transitioning from a pure scaling technology to a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum L1. 2. **Interoperability as State Trust:** Solving L2 fragmentation is less about cross-chain bridges and more about enabling faster, trust-minimized state verification between environments. This involves initiatives like faster L1 finality, intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), and native account abstraction. 3. **Blurring Layers:** With the potential integration of zk-proofs into L1 validation (making L1 akin to its own "Rollup") and the concept of "Native Rollups," the rigid boundary between L1 and L2 may fade. The future could be a unified system with multiple execution domains (for DeFi, gaming, privacy, etc.) sharing a common security, settlement, and state framework. In conclusion, Ethereum's goal is not to abandon L2s or re-centralize everything on L1, but to re-integrate the fragmented user experience—liquidity, accounts, applications—while preserving the scaling benefits of a multi-environment ecosystem. The endgame is a cohesive "one chain" feeling for users, powered by diverse but securely interconnected execution layers.

marsbit18m ago

L2 'Recalibration': When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

marsbit18m ago

The Encryption Bill Clarity's Challenge: A Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

U.S. lawmakers are attempting to advance the Clarity Act, a significant crypto market structure bill, but its path is fraught with partisan hurdles. The process has been rocky since January, when a prior bipartisan deal in the Senate Banking Committee was upended. A key compromise in May on "yield" issues allowed the bill to move forward in committee, but only with the conditional support of two Democratic senators, Angela Alsobrooks and Ruben Gallego. They emphasized that their final vote depends on reaching an agreement on ethics provisions for elected officials. Ultimately, the Senate Agriculture Committee passed its version along party lines without Democratic support. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, the demand for strong ethics language has expanded beyond Democrats. Additional controversies surround provisions related to yields (aligning some Republicans with large banks) and developer protections (opposed by enforcement agencies). Core concerns about illicit finance and consumer protection remain central to the debate. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, achieving the necessary bipartisan compromise is proving difficult. While momentum exists—including recent meetings between senators and White House officials—a reconciled bill text faces skepticism. Senator Gallego has stated that without ethics terms acceptable to Democrats, they will not provide the needed votes. The immediate goals for the crypto community in Congress are unclear: a symbolic Senate vote before the August recess, eventual passage into law by 2026, or forging a final compromise framework. The arduous, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support continues, mirroring the traditional legislative grind the industry must now navigate.

Foresight News1h ago

The Encryption Bill Clarity's Challenge: A Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy FLOW

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Flow (FLOW) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Flow (FLOW) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Flow (FLOW)After purchasing your Flow (FLOW), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Flow (FLOW)Easily trade Flow (FLOW) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

3.8k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy FLOW

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of FLOW (FLOW) are presented below.

活动图片