Five Meme Coins Soar Against the Market Trend, Which Is the Next Potential Coin?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2025-12-18Last updated on 2025-12-18

Abstract

Despite a generally bearish crypto market, five tokens have experienced significant price surges. PIPPIN, an AI Agent token, saw a dramatic rise from $0.05 to over $0.44, driven by concentrated buying and suspected insider control of up to 80% of its supply. FOLKS, the token of cross-chain DeFi protocol Folks Finance, surged nearly 24x from its low following its S2 incentive announcement, though it later fell sharply. BEAT, a Web3 AI entertainment token on BNB Chain, rapidly grew its market cap to $440 million. AIA, a decentralized AI agent token, plummeted over 90% after Binance Futures delisted its perpetual contract but rebounded 160% after a contract swap. RAVE, a music and culture DAO token, gained attention after support from Donald Trump Jr. and CZ, rising over 410% and listing on multiple exchanges. These tokens share characteristics of low initial market caps, community or insider-driven pumps, and high volatility.

Original / Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author / Wenser(@wenser2010)

The cryptocurrency market continues to fluctuate and trend lower. However, even in a sluggish market, a few tokens defy the trend, maintaining their own independent rhythm of "sharp rises and falls." Odaily Planet Daily will梳理(review) the "meme coins" with impressive recent price performance in this article, attempting to summarize common characteristics to help discover the next investment target with potential for a surge.

PIPPIN: The Orphan of the AI Agent Craze, a Masterpiece of "Insider Trading"

From late last year to January this year, AI Agent tokens once captured the absolute focus of the crypto market. Tokens like ai16z(ELIZAOS) and swarms frequently topped the token gain charts, and PIPPIN was also a product of the same batch of AI-themed tokens at that time.

But nearly a year later, only PIPPIN remains, possibly selected by wild market manipulators for its ease of control, experiencing a continuous rise over the past half month. It's worth noting that on November 23rd, its price was only around $0.05. Just a week later, its price had skyrocketed to over $0.17:

On December 1st, PIPPIN defied the market by surging over 60%, its price approaching $0.18; at that time, analyst @frontrunnersx提醒(warned), PIPPIN showed characteristics of concentrated accumulation, with some addresses continuously buying and holding without significant selling, causing the price to continuously hit short positions during the upward trend and trigger chain liquidations. One address bought about $200,000 worth of PIPPIN 6 days prior, sold after the price doubled, and is currently performing a similar operation on ARC.

On December 2nd, Bubblemaps monitoring revealed that 50 related addresses purchased PIPPIN tokens worth $19 million. It was also found that 26 addresses withdrew 44% of the PIPPIN token supply, totaling $96 million, from the Gate platform over two months, with most wallets being recently funded. Most PIPPIN token withdrawals occurred on October 24th and November 23rd. By then, the PIPPIN token price had already surged by 1000%, with insiders controlling half of the token supply, valued at $120 million.

In other words, the wild manipulators' accumulation period for PIPPIN started even earlier, about a month prior, with the真正的(violent)拉升(surge) occurring about a month and a week after accumulation began.

Subsequently, a diamond hands address liquidated its previously accumulated 24.8 million PIPPIN tokens, with floating profits shrinking from a peak of $7.6 million to $3.65 million.

On December 6th, Onchain Lens monitoring showed a whale spent 23,736 SOL (worth approximately $3.3 million) to buy 16.35 million PIPPIN at $0.20 over 3 days, with floating profits exceeding $740,000 at that time.

On December 16th, Bubblemaps issued another reminder. The PIPPIN price continued to rise, but internal addresses now held about 80% of the supply, valued at approximately $380 million. Bubblemaps pointed out: Since the last disclosure (December 2nd), 16 new wallets with the same pattern have appeared (funded by HTX, received similar amounts of SOL, no history, large PIPPIN withdrawals from CEXs); another group of 11 wallets linked to Bitget was identified, collectively holding about 9% of the supply, with highly consistent fund flows and timing windows, suspected to be controlled by the same entity.

That night, as the PIPPIN price fell below $0.3, this "meme coin spectacle"宣告(declared) a阶段性(phase)收网(wind-down). But the next day, December 17th, PIPPIN一度(surged) to around $0.5, causing another large wave of short liquidations. It must be said, the brutal methods of bear market manipulators are堪称(truly)残忍(ruthless).

As of writing, the PIPPIN price is temporarily reported at $0.44, with a 24-hour increase of over 15%. Its performance continues.

FOLKS: Cross-Chain DeFi Protocol Token, Up Nearly 24x From Low Point Due to S2 Incentive Announcement

As a cross-chain DeFi protocol providing lending, staking, and trading services, primarily operating on the Algorand chain, Folks Finance originally had relatively few followers. But with the official announcement of the S2 incentive campaign, market enthusiasm for its token reignited.

It's worth mentioning that Folks Finance distributed 1.5 million FOLKS tokens during the S1 incentive campaign, including Chainlink incentives; on November 6th, FOLKS officially launched on Binance Alpha, with a historical low price of around $2.

After the official Folks Finance announcement on December 9th, the FOLKS token price soared from under $10;

On December 14th, after nearly a week of speculation, the FOLKS token price broke through $40 for the first time, eventually rising to nearly $47, an increase of nearly 24 times from the low point;

Subsequently, the FOLKS price quickly retreated, falling by about 80%.

As of writing, the FOLKS price is temporarily reported at $6.4, with a 24-hour decrease of over 24%. The circulating supply is 12.7 million tokens (25.4% of total supply), with a temporary market cap of around $81 million.

BEAT: A True Meme Coin Needs Few Words

As another altcoin choosing to root itself in the BNB Chain ecosystem, similar to previous meme coins like MYX and COAI, BEAT's rise is another classic case.

It's worth noting that the official account behind the BEAT token project promotes the concept of a "Web3 AI entertainment platform + IP creation platform" – a rehashed version of hot concepts. After launching on Binance Alpha and futures in early November, BEAT officially claimed to have over 1.2 million independent on-chain holding addresses. One must say, "Audacity leads to abundance."

Similar to the price action of previous meme coins, BEAT started with a low market cap – after an initial rise upon listing on Binance Alpha, its market cap remained around $25 million; subsequently, the price飞速(rapidly)上涨(rose) amidst repeated pumps and dumps.

As of writing, the BEAT price is temporarily reported at around $2.7, with a 24-hour increase of over 14%. The circulating market cap is temporarily reported at $440 million, with about 1.26 million on-chain holding addresses (Note: Original said 12.6, assumed typo for 1.26 million based on context).

AIA: Decentralized AI Agent Concept Token, Volatility from Contract Swap

As the project token for DeAgent AI, AIA previously attracted significant market liquidity and attention due to a massive surge after listing on Binance futures, its price once skyrocketing over $1. However, constrained by the increasingly quiet market environment and the gradual cooling of the AI narrative, the token price gradually fell into silence, experiencing a continuous decline.

But the incident of "Binance delisting AIA futures" injected volatile energy into its liquidity once again.

On December 11th, according to an official announcement, Binance Futures announced it would close all AIAUSDT perpetual contracts at 20:15 (UTC+8) on December 11, 2025, for automatic settlement. After settlement, the contract would be delisted. AIA一度(plummeted) over 90%.

But subsequently, Binance announced that Alpha 2.0 would support a contract swap for DeAgentAI (AIA). Starting from 20:00 (UTC+8) on December 11, 2025, Binance Alpha 2.0 had temporarily closed AIA trading to execute this contract migration. This migration would be executed at a 1:1 ratio. The snapshot time was 20:00 (UTC+8) on December 11, 2025. Binance Alpha 2.0 would resume DeAgentAI (AIA) trading at 16:00 (UTC+8) on December 15, 2025.

On December 15th, official data from Binance Alpha showed that DeAgentAI (AIA) had completed the smart contract swap and officially resumed trading at 16:00 (UTC+8) on December 15th. Market data showed AIA surged significantly after opening, with gains一度(exceeding) 160%, topping the Binance Alpha gain charts.

As of writing, the AIA price is temporarily reported at $0.11, with a 24-hour decrease of 6.3%. The circulating market cap is temporarily reported at $16 million.

RAVE: Offline Community-Driven Culture Platform, Supported by Trump Jr. and CZ's Reposts

As a DAO organization promoting the concept of a "decentralized music and culture community and platform ecosystem," RaveDAO's development speed has been like a cheat code. After months of community and project building, RaveDAO has previously completed several member NFT sales.

On November 10th, RaveDAO officially announced its tokenomics and airdrop details. The official stated that the token aims to connect artists, organizers, and fans through token economics, promoting a decentralized entertainment ecosystem of "culture as protocol." RAVE has a total supply of 1 billion tokens, allocated as follows: Community 30%, Ecosystem 31%, Team & Co-builders 20%, Early Supporters 5%, Liquidity 5%, Airdrop 3%, Foundation & Public Goods Pool 6%. Approximately 23.03% will be in circulation after the Token Generation Event (TGE), with the rest subject to a 12-month cliff and a 36-month linear vesting period.

A month later, on December 10th, Binance Alpha announced it would soon list RaveDAO (RAVE).

The next day, news spread that RaveDAO received support from both the WLFI and Aster ecosystems. On December 12th, within an hour of listing on Binance Alpha, its trading volume exceeded $25 million.

Moreover, RaveDAO's "top-level connections" were remarkably impressive – on the evening of the 12th, Trump Jr. reposted and followed news about Aster's collaboration with USD1. RaveDAO, as one of the collaboration participants, gained massive exposure from this. CZ also reposted this tweet later. The RAVE price subsequently rose.

On December 13th, the RAVE price一度(touched) $0.67, with a 24-hour increase of over 410%;

On December 14th, Binance Futures launched RAVE U本位(USD-M) contracts;

On December 15th, RAVE was successively listed on OKX, Bybit, Bitget, Aster, Gate, Kucoin, MEXC, and other centralized exchanges. The price at that time fell back to around $0.41.

As of writing, the on-chain RAVE price is temporarily reported at $0.38, with a 24-hour increase of over 12%. The circulating market cap is temporarily reported at $88 million.

Related Questions

QWhat are the five 'meme coins' mentioned in the article that have surged against the market trend?

AThe five coins are PIPPIN, FOLKS, BEAT, AIA, and RAVE.

QAccording to the article, what was a key characteristic of the PIPPIN token that allowed it to be manipulated?

AA key characteristic was that a large portion of its supply (up to 80%) was controlled by internal addresses and wallets linked to exchanges, making it easy for a 'wild whale' to manipulate the price.

QWhich token experienced a near 24x price increase from its low point due to an incentive announcement, and what was the reason for its subsequent sharp drop?

AThe FOLKS token experienced the near 24x increase after the announcement of its Season 2 incentives. Its price subsequently dropped sharply by around 80% after the initial hype subsided.

QWhat event caused the AIA token to crash over 90%, and what action by Binance later caused its price to surge again?

AThe AIA token crashed over 90% after Binance Futures announced it would delist and settle all AIAUSDT perpetual contracts. Its price later surged over 160% when Binance Alpha announced and executed a 1:1 contract swap for the token.

QHow did RAVE token gain significant exposure and celebrity endorsement according to the article?

ARAVE gained significant exposure when Donald Trump Jr. tweeted about a partnership involving RaveDAO, which was later retweeted by former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ).

Related Reads

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbit1h ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbit1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手2h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手2h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit2h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片