Ethereum’s BPO fork: How it will shape ETH’s 2026 prediction

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-08Last updated on 2026-01-08

Abstract

Ethereum's BPO fork increases the blob limit per block from 15 to 21, a key upgrade for its Layer 2 scaling strategy. This provides L2s like Arbitrum with more data capacity, which enhances scalability and reduces transaction costs for users. Crucially, it strengthens Ethereum's economic model by creating a feedback loop: increased L2 activity generates more fee revenue that flows back to the Ethereum mainnet, offsetting previous revenue declines from lower fees. This strategic move supports growing on-chain adoption and solidifies Ethereum's fundamentals, positioning it strongly for 2026.

As L1s evolve, the pressure on decentralization naturally increases.

No doubt, that’s the main reason “scalability” has become a top priority for developers, as chains compete to handle more data without compromising security. To make that work, adding an extra layer becomes essential.

For Ethereum [ETH], this comes through L2s like Arbitrum [ARB], which developers use to build dApps without dealing with high fees. Against this backdrop, Ethereum’s latest BPO fork stands out as a meaningful upgrade.

According to the official announcement, the fork raised the blob limit from 15 to 21, giving Ethereum-based L2s more room to post data each block. In simple terms, this means better scalability and lower costs for L2 users.

Why does this matter? L2s don’t just scale Ethereum. Instead, they also feed into Ethereum’s economic model. Put simply, as L2 usage grows, a portion of the fees they pay for settlement flows back to the Ethereum mainnet.

In that sense, this upgrade isn’t just a scaling change.

Instead, it reinforces Ethereum’s strategy of pushing activity to L2s while still capturing value at the base layer. More importantly, looking at on-chain activity, this latest fork really does feel like a strategic masterstroke.

Scaling L2s without sacrificing Ethereum’s economics

The short-term impact of Ethereum’s 2025 upgrades was a bit bearish.

Take the fee structure, for example: The back-to-back upgrades lowered network fees, which hit ETH’s revenue by around $100 million, as L2 earnings dropped roughly 53%. And yet, Ethereum keeps rolling out forks.

The key reason? Network usage. As the chart below shows, L1 application TVL has now crossed $300 billion, showing that activity and adoption are still growing, offsetting lost revenue and keeping devs incentivized.

Notably, this is where the recent BPO fork comes in.

With Ethereum already seeing solid usage, the higher blob limit gives L2s more space to post data per block, supporting even more activity. The result? More data processed means Ethereum can recover lost revenue.

In short, this is a smart strategic move: it lets L2s scale without hurting Ethereum’s economic model, creating a strong feedback loop. More data leads to more revenue, which in turn drives even more developer activity.

Hence, this puts Ethereum’s fundamentals front and center for this cycle.


Final Thoughts

  • Raising the blob limit from 15 to 21 gives ETH-based L2s more room per block, improving scalability and supporting higher on-chain activity.
  • Increased L2 usage feeds revenue back to ETH’s base layer, positioning ETH strongly for 2026.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of Ethereum's recent BPO fork upgrade?

AThe main purpose of the BPO fork is to increase the blob limit from 15 to 21, which gives Ethereum-based L2s more space to post data per block, thereby improving scalability and reducing costs for users.

QHow does increased L2 activity ultimately benefit the Ethereum mainnet?

AIncreased L2 activity benefits the Ethereum mainnet because a portion of the fees paid by L2s for settlement flows back to the base layer, feeding into Ethereum's economic model and helping to recover revenue.

QDespite lowering fees, why do developers continue to push for Ethereum upgrades like the BPO fork?

ADevelopers continue to push for upgrades because the growth in network usage and Total Value Locked (TVL) offsets the short-term revenue loss from lower fees, and the upgrades create a feedback loop that supports long-term scalability and economic strength.

QWhat was a short-term bearish impact of Ethereum's 2025 upgrades mentioned in the article?

AA short-term bearish impact was that the back-to-back upgrades lowered network fees, which reduced ETH's revenue by approximately $100 million as L2 earnings dropped by roughly 53%.

QHow does the article suggest the BPO fork positions Ethereum for the year 2026?

AThe article suggests that by enabling greater L2 usage which feeds revenue back to the base layer, the BPO fork strengthens Ethereum's fundamental economics and strategically positions it strongly for 2026.

Related Reads

Different Choices After the Plunge: Institutions Buy the Dip, Traders Shift to US Stocks

Title: Diverging Strategies After the Crash: Institutions Buying the Dip, Traders Shifting to US Stocks Following a sharp decline where Bitcoin briefly fell below $60,000 on June 6th, market sentiment remains "extreme fear" despite a partial recovery. This has led to varied responses from major market participants. Several institutional figures and analysts present a cautiously optimistic long-term view for Bitcoin. Glassnode's co-founder identifies $46k-$54k as a probable key bottom range based on historical on-chain models, while a Standard Chartered executive suggests the bottom is nearly formed. Strive's CEO points to Bitcoin touching its 200-week moving average as a historically reliable buy signal. Analysts highlight metrics like MVRV ratio and the "Power Law" model indicating Bitcoin is in an extremely undervalued zone. Conversely, some traders are exiting the crypto space. One trader cited a more attractive risk/reward profile and deeper research opportunities in US stocks, particularly with AI-related equities outperforming and capital rotating away from crypto. This shift is partly attributed to perceived ongoing risks, including those related to Strategy's Bitcoin sales. Market prediction data suggests a high probability (72%) of Bitcoin falling below $55,000, but lower odds for a deeper crash below $35k-$40k. The overall picture is one of division: institutions and long-term analysts see a accumulating opportunity, while some active traders are seeking alpha elsewhere amidst the volatility and shifting capital flows.

marsbit41m ago

Different Choices After the Plunge: Institutions Buy the Dip, Traders Shift to US Stocks

marsbit41m ago

Tech Stocks in the Midst of Deleveraging: Rather Than Rushing to Buy the Dip, Wait for the Macro Environment to Stabilize First

"Technology Stocks in Deleveraging Phase: Wait for Macro Stability Before Buying the Dip" The current sell-off in tech/AI stocks is primarily driven by macro headwinds, not a breakdown in AI fundamentals. After a parabolic rise, the market faced a perfect storm: an overcrowded trade, a massive SpaceX IPO draining liquidity, pre-CPI/PPI/FOMC hedging, and strong jobs data renewing "higher-for-longer" rate fears. This triggered a concentrated deleveraging in hot tech names. Key historical context: Unlike the December 2023 sell-off focused on AI capex returns, the current correction centers on the "denominator" – rising concerns over rates, inflation, the Fed, geopolitics, and liquidity. Leading memory stocks like Micron have seen ~20% pullbacks, significant but not yet at panic levels seen in March. The intense selling wave may be largely over, but a quick V-shaped recovery is unlikely. The market will likely churn in high volatility, awaiting clarity. The immediate catalyst needed for a sustainable reversal is a "stop-bleeding" signal from macro conditions. This doesn't require a major positive shock (like the April Iran ceasefire), but simply a halt to further deterioration: CPI not surprising hotter, Treasury yields stabilizing, the Fed not turning more hawkish, and post-SpaceX IPO liquidity easing. Once macro pressure plateaus, the intact AI investment thesis – centered on persistent compute/memory shortages and accelerating commercialization – can quickly regain market focus. The strategy is clear: prioritize monitoring macro stabilization over rushing to bottom-fish individual AI stories. Patience is key.

marsbit48m ago

Tech Stocks in the Midst of Deleveraging: Rather Than Rushing to Buy the Dip, Wait for the Macro Environment to Stabilize First

marsbit48m ago

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

South Korean stocks experienced their sharpest decline of the year, with the KOSPI index plunging nearly 9% on Monday, triggering a market circuit breaker. Leading semiconductor firms Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix were heavily sold off, raising questions about whether the AI-driven bull market has reached an inflection point. This sell-off was largely triggered by a significant drop in the U.S. semiconductor sector late last week. Concurrently, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang visited Seoul over the weekend, meeting with top executives from SK Group, Samsung, LG, and NAVER. He announced a new multi-year partnership with SK Hynix to co-develop next-generation memory products for AI data centers. Huang emphasized that AI infrastructure build-out remains in its early stages, creating a stark contrast between market panic and ongoing, strengthened industry collaboration. The article argues that South Korea has become one of the most sensitive markets for global AI-related capital flows, functioning like a large AI memory ETF due to the heavy weighting of its chipmakers. The current market turmoil reflects a shift in investor focus: from simply betting on overall AI growth to scrutinizing which companies will actually capture the profits from that growth. This "profit pool reassessment" phase is causing high volatility based on supply chain news and earnings guidance. Ultimately, the direction of the Korean market will be determined by external factors—NVIDIA's orders, HBM supply-demand dynamics, and capital expenditures from cloud service providers—rather than domestic conditions. The disconnect between sharp price corrections and continued strong signals from the industry core leaves the market at a crossroads, awaiting clearer data on the durability of AI infrastructure demand.

marsbit1h ago

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

marsbit1h ago

Trump in Talks with AI Companies Over Profit Sharing, A Narrative Pressure of Industrial Revolution Scale Begins

In recent AI market discussions, a new dimension beyond growth and profits has emerged: the question of how the immense wealth potentially generated by AI should be shared with the wider public. Triggered by reports of White House officials discussing "voluntary equity transfers" with top AI firms, similar to models like Alaska's Permanent Fund, the conversation focuses on public wealth funds. OpenAI's own whitepaper proposes such funds, allowing households without direct tech stock ownership to benefit from AI gains. More radical proposals, like Bernie Sanders' call for high public equity stakes and board seats, represent an extreme end of the spectrum. Currently, these are early-stage policy probes, not enacted laws. OpenAI's initiative is seen as an attempt to secure "social license" for its future expansion, mitigating risks of public backlash, stricter regulation, or anti-trust actions as AI's economic impact grows. The core market implication is the introduction of a "policy discount" to AI valuations, particularly for private model companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI. Investors must now consider not just future earnings but also what portion might be allocated to public mechanisms. The impact varies greatly based on the mechanism. A small, voluntary transfer of non-voting economic rights (e.g., 5%) acts as a quantifiable long-term cost. Government acquisition of economic rights via warrants tied to support differs from direct equity with governance power. The most disruptive scenario would be forced high-percentage public ownership affecting control and innovation incentives. Key signals to watch include whether other AI companies follow suit, if the White House formalizes proposals, related disclosures in future IPO documents, and any market price reactions. For now, this represents a shift from pricing pure AI growth to pricing its potential distribution. A manageable, voluntary economic share is akin to an insurance cost for societal acceptance, while a forced shift toward control and governance would fundamentally alter valuation logic.

marsbit1h ago

Trump in Talks with AI Companies Over Profit Sharing, A Narrative Pressure of Industrial Revolution Scale Begins

marsbit1h ago

From Record Highs to a Two-Week Low: Why Did AI Concept Stocks Suddenly Pull Back?

From Record Highs to Two-Week Lows: Why Did AI Stocks Suddenly Pull Back? U.S. stock indices, led by the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100, fell sharply to two-week lows. This marked a reversal from earlier in the week when AI infrastructure and semiconductor stocks had propelled major indices to record highs. Investors are rotating out of these previously high-flying tech sectors into other areas. The sell-off was driven by profit-taking and concerns that the AI rally had become overextended, exacerbated by chipmaker Broadcom's sales outlook falling short of lofty market expectations. The decline accelerated following a stronger-than-expected U.S. May nonfarm payrolls report, which showed 172,000 jobs added versus an estimated 88,000. This data sparked a jump in bond yields, with the 10-year Treasury yield rising to 4.553%, as it reinforced market speculation that the Federal Reserve's next move could be a rate hike rather than a cut. Globally, equities also declined, with European and Asian markets falling. Within the U.S. market, chip and AI-related stocks like Super Micro Computer and Arm Holdings led the losses, dropping over 7%. Cryptocurrency-linked stocks and mining shares also fell sharply amid drops in Bitcoin and commodity prices. While the overall Q1 earnings season remained solid, with 83% of S&P 500 companies beating estimates, the weakness was concentrated in tech. Excluding the tech sector, Q1 earnings growth was around 3%, the weakest in two years.

marsbit1h ago

From Record Highs to a Two-Week Low: Why Did AI Concept Stocks Suddenly Pull Back?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片