Dialogue with Circle's Chief Commercial Officer: Partnering with Mastercard to Accelerate the Adoption of Crypto Payments, Stablecoins' Future Extends Beyond Trading

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-13Last updated on 2026-03-13

Abstract

Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin with a market cap exceeding $77 billion, is expanding its focus beyond stablecoins to build a comprehensive internet financial platform. The company is developing infrastructure—including developer tools, a payment network, and its own blockchain, Arc—to facilitate the transition of financial services to blockchain technology. This shift promises faster, cheaper, and more transparent global payments. In a recent interview, Circle's Chief Business Officer Kash Razzaghi emphasized that modernizing the financial ecosystem is too large a task for any single entity, highlighting the importance of partnerships, such as with Mastercard. He noted that Mastercard’s involvement lends credibility and accelerates the adoption of blockchain-based payments. Razzaghi identified three primary use cases for stablecoins: trading and investment (currently the dominant use), cross-border payments (due to lower costs and faster settlement), and store of value (especially in countries experiencing hyperinflation). He believes mainstream adoption will occur when the underlying technology becomes so seamless that users are unaware they are using stablecoins—similar to how people use the internet without understanding HTTP. Reflecting on his diverse career spanning sports, media, and fashion, Razzaghi underscored that his passion for mission-driven problem-solving and business development prepared him for his role in advancing blockchain-based financial in...

Author: Mastercard

Compiled by: Felix, PANews

Circle is best known for its stablecoin USDC, which currently has a circulating market cap exceeding $77 billion, making it one of the largest stablecoins globally. However, Circle's ambitions extend far beyond this.

Circle is committed to building the necessary infrastructure to make blockchain payments and financial services truly accessible to the average user. To this end, Circle provides developer tools, the Circle payment network, and its self-developed blockchain Arc, aiming to offer blockchain-based payment capabilities to almost any company.

Kash Razzaghi, the Chief Commercial Officer responsible for advancing these partnerships and strategies, stated: "We are building an internet financial platform that can help facilitate and accelerate the shift of funds onto the blockchain."

The transition of financial infrastructure to blockchain promises to make fund flows faster, cheaper, and more transparent. He noted that the task of evolving the entire payment ecosystem is too immense for any single entity to handle alone. Therefore, Circle is collaborating with multiple companies, including Mastercard, to promote the use and acceptance of stablecoins worldwide. It is reported that Mastercard launched a new cryptocurrency partnership program this week, and Circle has joined this initiative.

"This requires a collective effort from the entire community," Razzaghi added. "Mastercard's involvement significantly enhances the credibility of this technology and demonstrates the future potential of the entire industry."

Razzaghi was interviewed by Mastercard shortly after returning from the World Economic Forum in Davos in January. In Davos, he engaged with various figures from the finance and financial services sectors, aiming to attract more participants to the growing blockchain community.

The following Q&A has been edited for clarity and conciseness.

What is your perspective on the current free-floating cryptocurrency market?

The market is volatile, which should be expected. For most of its development, cryptocurrency has been directly associated with speculation. But what excites us is moving beyond that. I don't think trading and speculation will completely disappear—that's not the point. It's about the evolution from speculation to infrastructure. Have we experienced booms in crypto speculation? Yes. Have we experienced turbulent times in crypto speculation? Yes. These cycles have always existed. If someone sells, I believe someone else will buy; it's natural.

What did you hear related to blockchain at Davos?

The discussions were entirely about infrastructure and how blockchain technology and digital assets can solve real-world problems, or enhance the flow of funds, value storage, and access to financial systems and tools. This was the refreshing aspect of Davos this year. As regulations have cleared obstacles for institutional participation, the advantages of infrastructure are becoming increasingly evident. This isn't about speculation; it's about how to use this technology to transfer billions or even trillions of dollars of value instantly, securely, and at low cost, and how to upgrade financial systems and infrastructure that have seen little change in the past 75 years.

The consensus in the discussions was that the entire ecosystem will benefit. Blockchain will assist companies currently operating in financial infrastructure, financial markets, or financial services to grow their businesses and provide better services. For a long time, people have debated, 'Will blockchain technology replace banks? Will it replace credit card networks? Will it replace this or that?' But the reality is, it won't.

What was truly refreshing was that the discussions among ecosystem participants also focused on this. All banks, financial service institutions, traditional exchanges, and card networks are actively embracing this technology because they anticipate that the cost of fund transfers will approach zero, and the speed of fund transfers will be significantly increased.

If we are to overhaul the financial system, where does that leave a company like Mastercard? We have already established a partnership—how do both parties benefit mutually? How does our work benefit consumers and small businesses?

What is Mastercard's core value? It's about providing trust, right? You have built a global trust network. I personally hold a Mastercard. When I swipe my card, merchants can be confident that the funds will be received because Mastercard backs it. In my view, the importance of trust will never disappear. I believe Mastercard's involvement is not only about maintaining and consolidating trust but also about providing more advanced technology for transactions. You make transactions more convenient, more accessible, and remove barriers and intermediaries. You are eliminating friction, and over time, it may become more cost-effective.

Circle's gain lies in the popularization of stablecoins and digital assets. We foresee a future where funds flow on-chain. We believe that in the future, the movement of funds on-chain will be more efficient. Of course, there is still much work to be done in terms of infrastructure, regulation, and compliance; we are not there yet. When Mastercard truly begins to build on-chain businesses and utilize on-chain products to serve its customers, it will accelerate the adoption of digital assets.

What are the main use cases for stablecoins currently?

There are currently three main use cases. In terms of popularity, usage, and growth, the primary use case for stablecoins is trading and investment. If you are engaged in digital asset investment and hold Bitcoin, Ethereum, or other digital assets, using USDC for investment is an excellent choice because you can buy and sell these assets at any time and hold the value in a stable currency like USDC.

The next two use cases, while not yet as large as trading and investment, show remarkable momentum. We believe the next phase of growth and practical application will come from these two areas. Among them, payments (especially cross-border payments) are a significant use case. Whether you are an institution or part of the diaspora, if you need to transfer funds from one country to another, or want to easily move funds from one wallet to another, stablecoins are a great option. Transferring funds on the blockchain can eliminate intermediaries, thereby reducing fees. Settlement times can be shortened from days or even weeks to seconds or minutes. We are seeing a substantial increase in fund flows across various industries. Even large institutions need to move funds from Singapore to New York, and now they can use stablecoins without being constrained by bank operating hours. We believe the application of payments will extend far beyond cross-border payments to all aspects of payments.

The third use case is store of value, which primarily occurs in countries suffering from currency devaluation, such as Iran, Venezuela, or Argentina. These countries experience hyperinflation, and people no longer trust their local currency, preferring to hold US dollars as a hedge.

We believe that the functions of payments and store of value will accelerate this trend, pushing the total market capitalization of stablecoins far beyond what it is today.

When do you think stablecoins will be widely adopted by the mainstream market?

There is a view that mainstream adoption will truly be achieved when stablecoins and this underlying technology as a whole become so foundational that people may not even realize they are holding stablecoins. They will think they are holding US dollars and sending US dollars. We often draw this analogy: when you visit a website and type in HTTP, most people don't understand that technology. They just know they are sending an email. This model of "mainstreaming" does exist, where the underlying infrastructure of stablecoins will be completely simplified into on-chain distribution.

You were the founder of a sports social platform. You worked at the video software platform Brightcove. You also did custom clothing. How have these experiences helped you for your current role?

Career paths are not linear. You benefit from luck and timing, and you also benefit from the expertise you accumulate, which can help you tackle future challenges. So, if you look back at my career, you'll see it blends various fields like apparel, sports companies, video distribution, and cryptocurrency. So, what is the common thread? Entrepreneurship, market expansion, business development, sales. I love creating. I am mission-driven. I enjoy solving problems that can truly impact large numbers of people.

Therefore, when I joined Circle six years ago, I wasn't what you'd call the 'most crypto-native' person. I wasn't a cryptocurrency expert, but when you figure out what this technology can actually do, you become inspired by it and driven by its mission.

Related reading: Circle's Turning Point: Stock Price Doubles, On-Chain Transactions Surpass USDT, Precisely Positioning for Agent Payments

Related Questions

QWhat is Circle's primary goal beyond its stablecoin USDC?

ACircle is building an internet financial platform to facilitate and accelerate the transition of funds on-chain, providing developer tools, the Circle payment network, and its proprietary blockchain Arc to enable blockchain-based payment capabilities for companies.

QHow does Circle view the role of partnerships, such as with Mastercard, in advancing blockchain payments?

ACircle believes that advancing the entire payment ecosystem is too large a task for any single entity, so partnerships with companies like Mastercard are crucial to promote the global adoption and acceptance of stablecoins, enhancing credibility and showcasing the industry's potential.

QWhat are the three main use cases for stablecoins as discussed by Kash Razzaghi?

AThe three main use cases are: 1) Trading and investment, where stablecoins like USDC are used to buy/sell digital assets; 2) Payments, especially cross-border, due to lower fees and faster settlement; 3) Store of value in countries experiencing hyperinflation or currency devaluation.

QWhen does Circle believe stablecoins will achieve mainstream adoption?

AMainstream adoption will occur when stablecoin technology becomes so integrated into the underlying infrastructure that people are unaware they are using it—similar to how HTTP is used without understanding the technology—believing they are simply holding or sending dollars.

QHow did Kash Razzaghi's diverse career background prepare him for his role at Circle?

AHis career in various industries like sports, video software, and custom clothing provided expertise in entrepreneurship, market expansion, business development, and sales, driven by a passion for mission-oriented problem-solving that impacts large populations, which aligns with Circle's goals.

Related Reads

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbit1h ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbit1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit2h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit2h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手2h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片