Dalio's Latest Interview: 3 Major Signs of an AI Bubble Bursting, and How to Respond?

marsbitPublished on 2026-08-03Last updated on 2026-08-03

Abstract

In a recent interview, Ray Dalio discusses the current AI investment bubble, drawing parallels to past speculative frenzies like the dot-com bubble. He explains that such bubbles form when revolutionary technology, like AI, sparks massive investor excitement and debt-fueled investment, driving prices beyond fundamentals. Dalio outlines three key signs of an impending bubble burst: 1) Rising interest rates forcing asset sales, 2) A significant increase in stock supply from companies issuing shares, and 3) Ownership shifting from strong hands to inexperienced, often leveraged, retail investors. To navigate this uncertainty, he advocates for a diversified portfolio across assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, and notably gold (5-15% allocation), which he views as a true "hard asset." He expresses skepticism towards Bitcoin as "digital gold," citing potential technological and governmental risks. Regarding AI's impact, Dalio believes the primary beneficiaries will be the capitalists who own the automating technology, potentially widening wealth inequality as AI replaces both physical and cognitive labor. However, he contends that humans with exceptional interpersonal skills, emotional intelligence, and collaboration abilities will remain highly valuable. Finally, on his theory of ~80-year major cycles in world order, Dalio notes that while timing isn't precise, current indicators suggest we are in the vicinity of a significant transitional period. His core investment advice...

Original from the podcast The Diary Of A CEO

Compiled / Odaily Planet Daily Golem (@web 3_golem)

Editor's Note: Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, recently gave an in-depth interview to the renowned business podcast The Diary Of A CEO, sharing his views on the AI bubble, the 80-year major cycle shift, and Bitcoin. In the interview, Dalio explained why we are in an AI bubble, outlined the three major signs that the bubble is about to burst, and expressed his belief that while capitalists will be the biggest beneficiaries of the AI transformation, people with exceptional human intelligence and the ability to collaborate with others will still excel in the future. Odaily Planet Daily has compiled the core content of Dalio's interview below. Enjoy~

Learning from History: How Did the AI Bubble Form?

The commonly referred to bubble is when prices rise sharply, company performances are excellent, then the bubble bursts, which impacts the economy and markets, followed by a great depression, such as the 1929 bubble or the 2000 dot-com bubble.

This happens because when a revolutionary new technology emerges, everyone bets it will surely succeed, rushes to invest, even borrows money to invest, but they overlook the importance of price. Ultimately, prices soar, creating a bubble.

Now we are equally excited about AI, and we should be, as it will bring revolutionary changes, which it indeed has. So, again, everyone wants to invest, but they still ignore the price. This is a certain mechanism hidden within different cycles.

In an economic bubble, people borrow heavily to invest. You see many people becoming wealthy, but wealth is not equivalent to real money because they cannot spend this wealth. When they must sell their wealth to get money, it depreciates. So, when they need cash for reasons like tax changes, rising interest rates, or debt repayment, the bubble starts to burst, and the market declines.

When the bubble bursts, the wealth accumulation process reverses. When they made a lot of money, they had highly valued collateral for loans; this compounding effect continues. But when the bubble bursts, this process also reverses.

Economic recessions typically also follow a bubble burst because when people start repaying debts and selling assets, consumption demand decreases, and spending naturally drops.

For example, during the Great Depression in the US, the late 1920s were a time of great prosperity. Households were electrified for the first time, refrigerators and lighting entered homes, cars, airplanes, and radios became popular. Everyone believed these technologies had a great future. But simultaneously, as people kept buying assets, stock prices kept rising, and people leveraged themselves to buy stocks, corporate profits ultimately couldn't support the corresponding stock prices, triggering a chain reaction that eventually led to the Great Depression.

My point is, in these massive trend shifts, people know very little. Anyone in the AI field cannot plan accurately. They simply don't know what future revenues will be. Ultimately, only two outcomes occur: either underinvestment, falling far behind competitors; or heavy investment, still lacking precise control. When this happens, problems arise.

The 3 Major Signs of a Bubble Bursting

In the initial stage, what punctures the bubble is often situations that force people to sell assets to raise cash, and this is generally rising interest rates. It could also be policies like wealth taxes, but broadly speaking, it's a tightening of monetary conditions. Because at this stage, there is often inflationary pressure, and central banks decide to tighten monetary policy. Thus, when interest rates rise, the returns investors can get from holding bonds can exceed the returns from equity investments.

Additionally, there is a significant increase in stock issuance. We have been discussing how demand pushes up stock prices and how wealth is created, but the market also has a supply side. Companies can issue stock; there is almost nothing easier for creating wealth than issuing stock. Nowadays, people can even announce they are starting a company and taking it public, then say to their audience they will issue shares. It is precisely this large supply of stock, along with increased fundraising needs from other companies, that will ultimately cause the bubble to burst.

Another classic way to gauge the extent of a bubble is to examine the ownership of these companies' shares, to see if the shares are held by steadfast investors or by fickle retail investors. But I must also emphasize that a bubble is not a black-and-white existence; it's a matter of degree.

Classic characteristics of fickle holdings are a massive influx of retail investors lacking expertise, especially through leverage. They either borrow money to buy stocks or purchase leveraged financial products. For example, there are now leveraged ETFs tracking the stock market. Investors participating in such products are essentially no different from rolling dice in gambling.

All of the above are major signs that a bubble will burst. When it bursts, panic sets in, leading to massive asset liquidation. Conversely, at that point, all assets become cheap, and everyone can afford them.

But in investing, people always like to get ahead, buying the bottom too early, and this behavior often further fuels bubbles. So I would like to add that the future is uncertain. Investors should not try to 'time the market.' Even experienced investors find it extremely difficult to precisely time a bubble burst. Therefore, the best investment approach in the face of a bubble is diversification.

Responding to a Bubble Burst Through Diversification

Ordinary people often think cash deposits are the safest asset, but in the long run, it's the worst investment because inflation erodes its value.

Besides the stock market, investors have many assets to choose from, such as gold, bonds, real estate, and Bitcoin. Their respective values fluctuate for various reasons. Typically, when gold rises, bonds often fall, and real estate depreciates; these changes follow certain patterns.

Therefore, the best practice is to build a diversified investment portfolio. This not only doesn't reduce returns but actually lowers risk. Diversification means holding a certain proportion of each asset type. Due to different volatilities, investors must know how to balance them. My suggestion is to start by investing in a real asset: gold.

Gold is very interesting because when all assets perform poorly, gold often performs well. It is a very effective diversification tool. Gold cannot be hacked by technology; you can hold it, own it. It is the only financial asset that is not someone else's liability.

So for most people, if they want to ensure they have some 'hard currency,' gold should make up 5% to 15% of their investment portfolio.

Views on Bitcoin

Some investors view Bitcoin as 'digital gold,' but I prefer investing in real gold bars, not Bitcoin.

Bitcoin is just a gold-like asset; it's also a form of currency that cannot be printed. But some technologies could harm it. For example, if quantum computing emerges and governments can monitor it, it could be taxed. Any digital currency is somewhat similar.

Moreover, when a government says 'I don't need Bitcoin,' they have the authority to deal with it as they wish. Also, central banks won't hold large amounts of such assets because central banks need to ensure the privacy of their transactions and keep them firmly under their control. Look at Russia's situation; their other assets were seized/frozen, but their gold, no one could touch.

Who Benefits Most from the AI Transformation?

In this AI transformation, only a very small number of people (less than one percent of the population) master cutting-edge technologies and can apply and accelerate their development. As for others, if your job involves thinking, you are at risk of being replaced.

We are entering a world where everything can be automated. Human evolution began in the agricultural age, where there was almost no real innovation. Later, humans invented machines that replaced human physical labor. People used to work in fields like cattle; later, they were replaced by tractors. Then we entered the industrial age. First, the invention of printing allowed people to learn knowledge, then various inventions emerged, the first industrial revolution arrived, where machines began replacing human physical labor in factories, etc.

So in my view, it's as if machines first replaced human physical functions, then replaced higher and higher levels, and then began replacing parts of human thinking that can be computerized. And this trend continues to develop, gradually replacing higher-order thinking and reasoning abilities. This development trajectory is part of the ongoing evolutionary process.

The ultimate beneficiaries are capitalists who own the ideas that replace workers. For example, when people shop in stores, merchants earn revenue. But if you look at the share allocated to workers, you'll find this share is declining, while the share allocated to merchants is rising. So we are going through a stage where, on one hand, the top tier creates astonishing wealth; on the other hand, the bottom tier faces enormous pressure.

This is the challenge we face. Although the economic situation is relatively good, the difficulty for college graduates finding jobs has increased significantly. For instance, new graduates need training when starting jobs, and now many jobs can be quickly performed by AI and computerization. As robotics advances, this will intensify. The disruptive change we see now is happening so fast precisely because massive funds are pouring into frontier AI models like Anthropic and OpenAI.

Simultaneously, the wealth gap is widening because capitalism, although I love capitalism, the reality is, it creates huge disparities in income and wealth. When a worker's mind and body are both replaced, as a human, what can they sell?

But don't be too pessimistic. What humans still possess are emotions and intuition. Some services AI cannot provide. So, if we explore what these 'services' are, for example, can robots provide a good massage SPA? What remains, people can explore further. In summary, I believe that in the foreseeable future, those with exceptional human intelligence and the ability to collaborate with others will still perform excellently.

Regarding the 80-Year Major Cycle

I previously said that world order shifts occur about every 80 years, but this number is not absolute. The cycle length has an average floating range. It's like human lifespan; each person's life expectancy or lifespan varies individually.

I wouldn't overemphasize the length of time; I would focus more on the current situation. In terms of symptoms or relevant indicators, where are we currently in this process? Where will the next important node appear?

The answer is somewhere near the current time zone we are in.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the three major signs that indicate an AI bubble is about to burst, according to Ray Dalio?

AAccording to Ray Dalio, the three major signs are: 1) Rising interest rates, which force people to sell assets to raise cash. 2) A significant increase in stock issuance, where companies create wealth by issuing shares, increasing supply. 3) A high concentration of holdings in the hands of unsteady, non-professional retail investors, especially those using leverage.

QHow does Ray Dalio suggest ordinary investors should respond to the potential bursting of an AI bubble?

ARay Dalio suggests that the best investment strategy for ordinary investors is diversification. He advises against trying to time the market and recommends building a diversified portfolio including assets like stocks, gold, bonds, real estate, and Bitcoin. He specifically highlights gold as a crucial 'hard asset' that performs well when other assets falter, suggesting it should make up 5% to 15% of a portfolio.

QWhy does Ray Dalio prefer investing in physical gold over Bitcoin?

ARay Dalio prefers physical gold over Bitcoin because gold is a tangible asset that cannot be hacked or compromised by technology like quantum computing. It is also not a liability of anyone else. He notes that governments can choose to reject or regulate digital currencies like Bitcoin and that central banks value the privacy and control they have over their own transactions, which Bitcoin does not provide. He uses the example of Russia, whose gold reserves remained untouched while other assets were frozen.

QWho does Ray Dalio believe will be the biggest beneficiaries of the AI revolution?

ARay Dalio believes that the biggest beneficiaries of the AI revolution will be the capitalists—the less than 1% of the population who own and control the capital and the cutting-edge AI technology. He explains that as machines and AI replace both physical and cognitive human labor, the share of wealth going to capital owners increases, while the share for workers declines, thereby widening the wealth gap.

QWhat unique human qualities does Ray Dalio think will allow people to remain valuable in an AI-dominated future?

ARay Dalio believes that human emotional intelligence, intuition, and the ability to collaborate effectively with others are qualities that AI cannot replicate. He suggests that services requiring these distinctly human traits, such as certain personal care or relational services, will remain valuable. Therefore, individuals with exceptional human intelligence and strong collaborative skills will continue to excel in the foreseeable future.

Related Reads

In-depth: The Foreign Guest Genspark

The article "The Foreign Guest: Genspark" investigates the identity and business practices of AI startup Genspark, which presents itself as a Palo Alto-based "AI Costco" offering a subscription bundle of over 70 models and numerous AI agent tools. Despite its official Silicon Valley narrative, Genspark's founding team has deep roots in Chinese tech giant Baidu, a history systematically downplayed in its branding. The company actively cultivates an image as an elite US firm, heavily publicizing partnerships and endorsements from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Microsoft, while distancing itself from the Chinese AI community and obscuring its connections to Chinese investors and open-weight models (like those from DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax) that power its services. Genspark's core strategy involves rapidly cloning and integrating successful AI product concepts (e.g., from Perplexity, Manus, Plaud) into its unified platform, supported by aggressive marketing, including Super Bowl ads and paid native content in publications like The Wall Street Journal. Critically, the article suggests a significant portion of its engineering and product development is conducted by a team in Beijing, operating outside its official US corporate structure. This duality allows Genspark to leverage Chinese talent and models for efficiency and cost reduction while constructing a public facade as a purely American success story. The piece concludes that Genspark's most effective agent is its own corporate identity, meticulously engineered to obscure its Chinese underpinnings and be perceived solely as a Silicon Valley company.

marsbit8m ago

In-depth: The Foreign Guest Genspark

marsbit8m ago

Debate: Korean Workers Fear Unemployment, While Musk Envisions a Society 'Without Work'?

While South Korean auto workers fear job losses from robotics, Elon Musk envisions a future where AI and robots render most work optional. This article explores the growing tension between immediate anxieties over automation and long-term visions of a post-work society. The piece begins with recent strikes at Hyundai's Korean plants, where unions, amid standard wage negotiations, also sought job guarantees against advancing robotics—specifically mentioning Boston Dynamics' Atlas. This reflects how anxiety about technological displacement is emerging even before robots are fully capable of replacing skilled labor on assembly lines. The author argues that while current robotics still struggle with the nuanced, experiential knowledge of veteran workers, the *perception* of imminent replacement is fueling social conflict prematurely. This modern "Luddite" sentiment is compared to the 19th-century English textile workers who smashed machines. Historically, Luddites weren't simply anti-technology; they were protesting the rapid devaluation of their skills and the unequal distribution of productivity gains. Similarly, today's workers ask who will bear the cost of transition and share in the new wealth created by machines. In contrast, figures like Elon Musk propose an optimistic endpoint: with AI and robotics driving extreme abundance, the link between work and survival could break. He suggests concepts like "Universal High Income" could allow society to share the technological bounty, transforming work from a necessity into a choice. The core challenge, however, lies in the transition. The author notes that technology's benefits diffuse slowly, while its disruptive costs—job losses, skill obsolescence—can be concentrated and immediate. The risk is a painful interim period where productivity gains are captured by a few before new social contracts, safety nets, and retraining systems are established. The conclusion calls for proactive governance. Just as past industrial revolutions gave rise to labor standards and social safety nets, the robotics era needs its own frameworks. These should address job transition support, distribution of productivity gains, safety liability, and ethical deployment. Embracing such "constraints" is not opposition to progress but a necessary step to ensure technology benefits society broadly. The discussion sparked by Hyundai's workers, therefore, is not premature but essential.

marsbit21m ago

Debate: Korean Workers Fear Unemployment, While Musk Envisions a Society 'Without Work'?

marsbit21m ago

CATL Invests in a 00s Graduate from Harbin Institute of Technology

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL) has exclusively invested in the Pre-A round of RoboParty, a company founded by 22-year-old Huang Yi. A former student at Harbin Institute of Technology, Huang built a bipedal humanoid robot in his dorm room and later dropped out to launch RoboParty in Shanghai. The company focuses on developing a fully open-source platform for humanoid robots, combining self-developed hardware, operating systems (Party OS), and foundational models. RoboParty's strategy emphasizes open-source collaboration to accelerate development and build a developer ecosystem, positioning itself as foundational infrastructure for embodied AI. Since its 2025 founding, the team—composed largely of top-tier university graduates—has secured six funding rounds in eight months, with investors including Matrix Partners, Xiaomi, and now CATL. This investment by CATL's corporate venture arm signals strong industry confidence in RoboParty's potential for real-world manufacturing and complex scenarios. Huang Yi prioritizes technological excellence and developer community growth over rapid commercialization. The company has already garnered significant interest from developers and research institutions globally. With a focus on continuous, rapid iteration and open innovation, RoboParty aims to prove the versatility of humanoid robots and drive the field toward an open-source future.

marsbit24m ago

CATL Invests in a 00s Graduate from Harbin Institute of Technology

marsbit24m ago

Will SpaceX's First Quarterly Report Rescue Its Stock Price Under the Pressure of 1.2 Billion Shares Unlocking?

SpaceX is set to release its first quarterly earnings report since going public, a key test for its stock which has declined 20% from its IPO price. Approximately 9.12 billion shares are set to unlock on August 6, with an additional 3.19 billion following a week later, creating potential selling pressure from early investors. A strong report may be the only catalyst to reverse the downtrend. The report will cover three segments: Space, Connectivity (Starlink), and AI. The AI business, centered on the merged xAI, is the biggest uncertainty. While it generated $818 million in revenue last quarter, it also reported a $2.5 billion operating loss and $7.7 billion in capital expenditures. New data center rental agreements with Anthropic and Google, particularly the substantial $1.25 billion monthly deal with Anthropic, add significant revenue variability this quarter. Investors await guidance on AI's future outlook and the timeline for launching AI computing satellites via Starship. Starlink remains the stable profit driver, ending last quarter with 10.3 million subscribers. Key metrics will be user growth, average revenue per user (ARPU), and enterprise/government contract backlogs. The Space segment, which posted a $657 million operating loss last quarter, will be scrutinized for updates on Starship development following its 13th test flight and the pace of Falcon 9 launches, many of which support internal Starlink deployment. Wall Street expects Q2 revenue of around $6.9 billion and EBITDA of $2.1 billion. However, as this is the first earnings report, analyst forecasts lack a historical baseline and could see significant variance. With a current market cap of ~$1.4 trillion and a high valuation, the market's reaction post-earnings will hinge on the report's strength, the magnitude of post-lockup selling, and ongoing investor concerns.

marsbit25m ago

Will SpaceX's First Quarterly Report Rescue Its Stock Price Under the Pressure of 1.2 Billion Shares Unlocking?

marsbit25m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片