Crypto’s Big Regulatory Overhaul May Crawl Through Years Of Policy Creation: Exec

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-01-14Last updated on 2026-01-14

Abstract

A top policy official at crypto firm Paradigm warns that a major US regulatory overhaul for cryptocurrency could take years to implement, despite lawmakers unveiling a draft bill. The bill, released by US lawmakers, aims to clarify whether tokens are securities or commodities and assigns oversight of many spot markets to the CFTC. However, Paradigm's Justin Slaughter notes the bill would require approximately 45 separate rules to be written by regulators. He compares the timeline to the post-Dodd-Frank era, which took three to eight years for rules to be finalized. This lengthy process, involving drafting, public comments, and potential legal challenges, would leave the industry in a state of prolonged uncertainty. Industry groups are preparing for phased changes, but bottlenecks like political turnover and debates over DeFi could further slow progress, potentially stretching the rulemaking across two presidential terms.

A top policy official at crypto firm Paradigm warned this week that a broad overhaul of US crypto rules could take years of agency work to finish.

Justin Slaughter, Paradigm’s vice president for regulatory affairs, said the law itself would only begin a longer process of writing dozens of detailed rules that agencies must draft, publish for comment, and finalize.

Lawmakers Unveil Draft Bill

On January 13, 2026, US senators released a draft bill meant to clarify which tokens are securities or commodities and to set who regulates spot crypto trading.

The draft would give the Commodity Futures Trading Commission authority over many spot markets and includes measures aimed at limiting how stablecoins are used to pay interest, among other provisions.

Rulemaking Could Stretch For Years

Slaughter pointed out that the bill would require about 45 separate, detailed rules to be written by regulators before its goals could be fully enforced.

That is a heavy technical lift. He compared the likely timeline to rules written after the Dodd-Frank law, which took roughly three to eight years to be finalized for many parts of the financial system.

That comparison matters because it shows how slow the work can be even when lawmakers act quickly. Agencies must draft proposals, take public comments, revise drafts, and then publish final rules. Each step can be delayed by legal challenges, staffing limits, or political shifts.

Industry Groups Prepare For Phased Change

Exchanges, banks, and stablecoin firms have already begun drafting compliance plans. Some industry players say they prefer the bill’s tilt toward the CFTC for spot oversight, believing it could ease certain market practices.

Others worry that long rulemaking windows will leave uncertainty for months, or even years, while firms try to follow shifting guidance.

BTCUSD now trading at $95,088. Chart: TradingView

What Could Slow Things Down

Among the likely bottlenecks: fights over who enforces which rules, debates on how decentralized finance fits under old statutes, and political turnover.

Slaughter warned that parts of the rulemaking might span two presidential terms before everything is settled. That would leave the sector operating under a mix of new guidance and legacy rules for a long time.

Lawyers And Regulators Step Into The Fray

Regulatory staff at the SEC and CFTC have already ramped up work on crypto issues. The SEC has signaled plans to update long-standing securities rules to better address tokenized instruments.

At the same time, the CFTC is preparing market-structure and custody guidance tied to its growing role. These agency moves will shape the final form of the technical rules required by whatever law, if any, becomes binding.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Related Questions

QAccording to Justin Slaughter, how many separate rules would regulators need to write to fully enforce the proposed crypto bill?

AAbout 45 separate, detailed rules.

QWhich US regulatory body would be given authority over many spot crypto markets under the draft bill?

AThe Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

QWhat historical law did Justin Slaughter compare the crypto rulemaking timeline to, and how long did that process take?

AHe compared it to the Dodd-Frank law, which took roughly three to eight years to finalize rules for many parts of the financial system.

QWhat are some of the potential bottlenecks that could slow down the crypto rulemaking process?

AFights over regulatory jurisdiction, debates on how decentralized finance fits under old statutes, and political turnover.

QWhat did the SEC signal it plans to update to better address tokenized instruments?

AThe SEC has signaled plans to update long-standing securities rules.

Related Reads

Huang Renxun Dramatically 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market

In early June, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with the KOSPI index dropping over 5% and triggering a trading halt. Amid this volatility, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul provided a dramatic boost to market sentiment. During his trip, Huang held a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung. He announced that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU would utilize SK Hynix DRAM and confirmed a multi-year technical collaboration between the two companies. This partnership aims to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure roadmap, covering products from data center supercomputers to personal AI devices. Huang also publicly commented that AI company stocks were attractively priced. A key announcement was that NVIDIA's upcoming Vera Rubin AI supercomputer systems will use HBM4 memory, with supply qualifications granted to all three major suppliers: SK Hynix, Samsung Electronics, and Micron Technology. Despite this multi-sourcing strategy, Huang warned that the industry-wide chip shortage, affecting everything from wafers to packaging, is expected to persist for several years due to relentless demand from global AI factory construction. The collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix will employ NVIDIA's AI platforms and Omniverse digital twin technology to enhance its own semiconductor design, simulation, and manufacturing processes, aiming for more autonomous factory operations. This visit builds upon a prior October 2025 agreement for SK Group to build a large-scale AI data center using over 50,000 NVIDIA GPUs. Huang's itinerary also included meetings with other Korean giants like Hyundai, LG, and Samsung, indicating NVIDIA's broader strategy to deepen ties with South Korea's tech industry.

链捕手5h ago

Huang Renxun Dramatically 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market

链捕手5h ago

When Inference Becomes a Scarce Resource, Who Captures the Value?

When Inference Becomes the Scarce Resource, Who Captures the Value? The core AI bottleneck has shifted from model training to inference (runtime execution). While concerns persisted about an "AI compute gap"—initially a $200B, now a $600B problem—the market is now recognizing that the solution and value lie in the inference layer. Nvidia's financial restructuring around "serving tokens" and Cerebras's successful IPO highlight this shift. Inference is a recurring, usage-based cost, estimated to be 10-50x larger than the one-time training market, especially with the rise of agentic AI. The inference stack spans six layers: silicon (e.g., Nvidia), bare metal (e.g., CoreWeave), GPU rental/aggregation, deployment/optimization, model APIs, and end applications. Most companies operate in one layer. However, Hyperbolic uniquely spans three layers (GPU rental, deployment, and model APIs) without owning any hardware. It aggregates fragmented GPU supply from multiple cloud providers into a standardized pool, offering developers the cheapest available compute through intelligent routing. Its multi-cloud aggregation creates a data moat and a flywheel: more supply leads to better pricing data and liquidity, attracting more developers and providers. In contrast, applications like Venice operate at the top of the stack, reselling privacy-wrapped inference but remaining dependent on and constrained by the underlying compute costs they purchase. As inference demand explodes, value accrues not just to consumer applications but increasingly to the aggregation and routing layer that captures their cost of revenue. The coming potential GPU oversupply reinforces this dynamic. While hardware owners may suffer from depreciation, asset-light aggregators like Hyperbolic benefit from price arbitrage, routing workloads to the cheapest available capacity. The ultimate winner in the inference economy may not be the entity with the most GPUs, but the one that can most efficiently discover, aggregate, and route the world's fragmented compute.

链捕手5h ago

When Inference Becomes a Scarce Resource, Who Captures the Value?

链捕手5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片