Crypto Market First Major Outflow In 5 Weeks – Here’s How Bitcoin And Ethereum Performed

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-31Last updated on 2026-03-31

Abstract

After five consecutive weeks of inflows, the cryptocurrency market experienced its first major capital outflow, with over $414 million withdrawn last week. This shift in investor sentiment was largely driven by rising rate expectations and geopolitical tensions involving Iran. The United States led the selling activity with $445 million in outflows, while regions like Germany and Canada saw inflows. Ethereum bore the brunt of the sell-off, recording approximately $222 million in outflows. In contrast, Bitcoin maintained a net inflow of over $964 million year-to-date despite the negative weekly performance. Analysts suggest this single week of outflows may not indicate a full trend reversal, but it has reduced market momentum. If macro conditions stabilize, inflows could resume in the coming weeks.

Despite waning price performance from Bitcoin and Ethereum, the broader cryptocurrency market still recorded notable inflows for weeks. However, all of these changed as investors’ sentiment shifted, and the crypto market ended up seeing massive capital outflows once again.

Bitcoin And Ethereum Are In Major Crypto Outflow

After several weeks of steady inflows, the cryptocurrency market has finally recorded a day of outflows as investors pull funds. Such a development is typically seen as a potential shift in investors’ sentiment across the highly volatile market.

As outlined in Milk Road’s report, this marks the first significant capital outflow in 5 weeks, raising questions about the market’s direction. Funds that had continuously invested in digital assets, especially well-known cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, are now starting to turn around.

A single week of outflows doesn’t always indicate a larger trend, but it frequently indicates that investors are becoming more cautious. However, this could shift investors’ focus toward the sustainability of crypto’s recent momentum.

Milk Road highlighted that over $414 million left the sector last week, putting an end to a stream that had bulls feeling more excited about the market. Underneath the surface, the United States led the selling activity with $445 million in outflows. Meanwhile, other regions such as Germany and Canada moved in the opposite direction to the US, buying the dip while American investors were heading for the exit.

Source: Chart from Milk Road on X

In this bloodbath, Ethereum led the selling activity, recording approximately $222 million in outflows. According to Milk Road, this figure represents more than half of the total weekly rain emerging from a single asset.

Bitcoin, on the other hand, is telling a different story compared to Ethereum. Even though the week was rough, Bitcoin still managed to attract over $964 million in net inflows year-to-date (YTD). However, investors panicked as the asset reacted strongly negatively to economic and macro events.

Taking a look at the market, this cautious investor sentiment can be traced back to two major catalysts, which include rising rate expectations and Iran war fears. When both negative events meet, it often leads to institutions pulling away from risk assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum very fast.

What Bulls And Bears Are Calling For

As the event intensified, the crypto market was the first thing to get trimmed, prompting bears to call this the beginning of a trend reversal. For bulls, they will point to the BTC YTD figure and declare that one bad week does not mean anything significant. Milk Road noted that both ideas make a point.

One week of outflows does not mean the multi-week trend will not continue, but it does reduce momentum and make sellers more alert. In the meantime, the next test is whether the next two weeks produce more of the same or whether this was just institutions getting spooked by speculative headlines that carry no real significance.

If Iran tensions ease and rates stay put, the inflow streak will probably resume and continue in the following weeks. Sustained inflows will likely recover momentum for digital assets, with Bitcoin and Ethereum transitioning into the upward direction again.

BTC trading at $67,394 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QWhat was the overall trend in the cryptocurrency market after five weeks of inflows, and what was the total outflow amount?

AThe cryptocurrency market recorded its first major outflow in 5 weeks, with a total of over $414 million leaving the sector.

QWhich two major cryptocurrencies were highlighted in the report, and how did their outflow performances differ?

AEthereum led the selling activity with approximately $222 million in outflows, while Bitcoin still maintained a net inflow of over $964 million year-to-date (YTD).

QAccording to the report, which country was the selling activity led by, and how did other regions like Germany and Canada react?

AThe United States led the selling activity with $445 million in outflows, while other regions such as Germany and Canada moved in the opposite direction by buying the dip.

QWhat were the two major catalysts identified as causing the shift to cautious investor sentiment?

AThe two major catalysts were rising rate expectations and fears of war with Iran, which led institutions to pull away from risk assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum.

QWhat do bulls and bears respectively argue about this single week of outflows, according to Milk Road?

ABears call it the beginning of a trend reversal, while bulls point to Bitcoin's strong YTD inflows and argue that one bad week is not significant.

Related Reads

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Access to Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal On June 12th, the U.S. government ordered AI company Anthropic to immediately suspend all foreign access—including foreign nationals within the U.S. and Anthropic's own foreign employees—to its newly released Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI models, citing national security concerns. This forced Anthropic to temporarily disable access to both models for all users globally, as it cannot technically differentiate user nationality at scale. The models, released just three days prior, represent Anthropic's highest public capability tier. Fable 5 is the first publicly available model from the advanced "Mythos" family, while Mythos 5 is a less-restricted version for approved cybersecurity and critical infrastructure partners. The government's directive was reportedly triggered by claims from another company that it could "jailbreak" Mythos 5, raising alarm within the Trump administration. Anthropic, in a detailed public statement, strongly challenged this rationale. The company argues the demonstrated "jailbreak" is a narrow, non-generalized technique that merely involves identifying minor, known software vulnerabilities—a capability common to other publicly available models like OpenAI's GPT-5.5 and routinely used by cybersecurity defenders. Anthropic stated it has complied with the order but disagrees with the government's standard, warning that applying it industry-wide would halt all new frontier model deployments. The company criticized the lack of a transparent, fact-based legal process and expressed confidence the situation stems from a misunderstanding. It is working to restore access and will release more technical details within 24 hours. Other Anthropic models remain unaffected.

链捕手13m ago

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

链捕手13m ago

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

**Raydium Exploit Reveals DeFi's Hidden Risk: Forgotten "Zombie" Contracts** A recent attack on Raydium's deprecated V3 AMM pools resulted in a loss of approximately $1.34 million. The hacker exploited pools that were no longer supported by Raydium's current UI or SDK but remained fully functional and accessible on-chain. This incident highlights a critical, often overlooked category of risk in DeFi: inactive or legacy smart contracts that projects fail to properly decommission. Since March 2025, there have been at least 8 publicly reported attacks targeting such abandoned contracts, with total losses around $10.8 million. Including older pools and deprecated features, the count rises to 10 incidents with roughly $22.5 million in losses. These "zombie contracts" represent a lifecycle management failure rather than a code vulnerability, yet they are typically misclassified under general "code bug" categories in security reports, masking the true scale of the problem. The root cause is that projects often merely document a contract as "deprecated" without taking essential technical steps to secure it: withdrawing remaining assets, disabling external call functions, and implementing ongoing monitoring. These forgotten, under-monitored components become prime targets for attackers. To address this, the industry needs to recognize "zombie contracts" as a distinct risk category and establish standardized decommissioning protocols. Essential steps should include: 1) a formal retirement announcement, 2) removal of all front-end integrations, 3) withdrawal of locked assets, 4) disabling key contract functions, 5) ongoing security monitoring, 6) clear user communication, and 7) a post-mortem analysis. The value of a DeFi project lies not only in its current TVL but also in the security of its historical codebase, which has now become a new attack surface.

Foresight News2h ago

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

Foresight News2h ago

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

Robots have started to 'consume data,' driving the formation of a new industrial supply chain focused on producing training data for embodied AI. Unlike large language models, which are trained on vast internet text corpora, embodied AI models face a 'data desert' in the physical world. This has created a massive demand for first-person perspective video data (Ego Data), captured by workers wearing cameras in places like Indian garment factories. Companies like Neocambrian AI are establishing 'data factories' where workers perform standardized tasks (e.g., sorting clothes, kitchen organization) to generate thousands of hours of video. Research, such as NVIDIA's EgoScale, demonstrates that scaling this human demonstration data predictably improves robot performance, particularly for dexterous manipulation. This has validated a training path combining large-scale human data for pre-training with smaller amounts of robot-specific data for fine-tuning. The value of different data types varies significantly, forming a 'data pyramid.' The base consists of low-cost, large-scale internet and Ego Data. Higher layers include more expensive motion-capture data (e.g., from data gloves), simulation/synthetic data, and the most costly and scarce layer: real robot teleoperation data. This demand has spawned a layered ecosystem of data suppliers: low-cost data factories, motion capture and alignment specialists, robot-native teleoperation service providers, simulation data companies, and platforms aiming for data standardization. Robot companies themselves are adopting a 'layered procurement' strategy: outsourcing generic Ego Data while building in-house capabilities for robot-specific adaptation data and the critical deployment/failure data generated in real-world applications. The industry is shifting focus from hardware and basic mobility to the data pipelines required for general-purpose capability. While parallels exist to data labeling companies like Scale AI in the LLM boom, the physical complexity of robot data—involving action success ambiguity and sim-to-real gaps—requires more integrated solutions for data collection, annotation, and a continuous feedback loop. The race is on to build the data engines that will teach robots to operate reliably in the unstructured real world.

marsbit4h ago

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片