Coinbase CEO Sees ‘Win-Win’ Outcome For Delayed Crypto Market Structure Bill

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-02-19Last updated on 2026-02-19

Abstract

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong remains optimistic about the delayed crypto market structure bill (CLARITY Act), expecting a "win-win" outcome for the industry, banks, and consumers. Despite bipartisan House approval in July 2025, the bill stalled in the Senate due to disputes, including over stablecoin rewards. Senator Bernie Moreno opposes allowing issuers to offer yields, while Armstrong argues rewards are essential for U.S. competitiveness. Armstrong notes growing bank involvement in crypto and emphasizes the need for innovation. High-level discussions continue, with the White House considering further meetings to resolve the deadlock.

The long‐awaited crypto market structure bill, known as the CLARITY Act, remains stuck in the US Senate, but Coinbase Chief Executive Officer Brian Armstrong says he still expects a positive resolution.

Coinbase CEO Remains Optimistic

Speaking Wednesday on CNBC during the World Liberty Forum at Mar‐a‐Lago, Armstrong expressed confidence that lawmakers will ultimately deliver what he described as a “win‐win” outcome for the crypto industry, the banking sector, and American consumers.

“There is now a path forward,” he said, framing the legislation as an opportunity to bring regulatory certainty while strengthening the country’s position in the global digital asset race.

The legislation cleared the House of Representatives in July 2025 with a strong bipartisan vote of 294–134. It was later referred to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs in September 2025, where it has yet to receive a floor vote.

Planned committee markups in mid‐January 2026, including sessions scheduled for January 15 and January 27, were canceled or indefinitely postponed amid industry pushback and internal disputes.

In late January and early February, the Senate Agriculture Committee advanced a related measure that included elements of the Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act (S. 3755) on a narrow party‐line vote. However, that step has not resolved the broader stalemate over market structure reform.

Senator Moreno Opposes Stablecoin Rewards

One of the main sticking points continues to be stablecoin yield — whether issuers should be allowed to offer rewards or interest to holders. Senator Bernie Moreno has argued that such rewards should not be included in the framework.

During the CNBC interview, Moreno suggested that, unless one owns a bank, one likely should not be concerned. He contended that consumers would benefit from greater competition for their deposits.

Nonetheless, the Senator from Ohio further expressed confidence that the crypto legislation would ultimately pass the current deadlock, saying, “We are going to get this bill across the finish line,” and adding that he hopes it happens by April.

Coinbase CEO has taken a different view on stablecoins, arguing that rewards are essential to building a competitive domestic market. “To build the stablecoin industry in America, we have to have stablecoin rewards,” he said.

The executive also noted that some financial institutions are already embracing the technology, adding that the “smartest banks” are leaning into crypto and forming partnerships with Coinbase.

“It is good for the banking industry to embrace innovation,” Armstrong said, stressing that the United States has historically succeeded by adapting rather than protecting incumbents.

“America has never been one to be stagnant and protect the incumbents. We want to lean into the future and make sure America stays competitive. We are existing on a global stage here.”

Bitcoinist reported Tuesday that the White House is considering convening another meeting as soon as Thursday to address the stablecoin yield issue, signaling that high‐level efforts to break the impasse are continuing.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap currently at $2.3 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the name of the crypto market structure bill discussed in the article and what is its current status in the US Senate?

AThe bill is called the CLARITY Act. It is currently stuck in the US Senate, having been referred to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and has yet to receive a floor vote.

QAccording to Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, what kind of outcome does he expect from the legislation?

ABrian Armstrong expects a 'win-win' outcome for the crypto industry, the banking sector, and American consumers, bringing regulatory certainty and strengthening the US position in the global digital asset race.

QWhat is one of the main sticking points, or disagreements, holding up the crypto market structure bill?

AOne of the main sticking points is the issue of stablecoin yield—specifically, whether issuers should be allowed to offer rewards or interest to holders.

QWhich US Senator is cited as being opposed to including stablecoin rewards in the bill, and what was their reasoning?

ASenator Bernie Moreno opposes including stablecoin rewards. He argued that consumers would benefit from greater competition for their deposits and suggested that unless one owns a bank, one should not be concerned with such rewards.

QWhat action is the White House reportedly considering to help break the impasse over the stablecoin issue?

AThe White House is considering convening another meeting as soon as Thursday to address the stablecoin yield issue, signaling continued high-level efforts to break the deadlock.

Related Reads

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbit21m ago

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbit21m ago

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War The article argues that the contemporary geopolitical and economic rivalry between the US and China represents a "New Cold War," but one fundamentally fought through technology and financial markets, not physical barriers or conventional trade. Historically, US dominance was secured through financial systems. The Soviet Union, reliant on the rigid "Transferable Ruble," was ultimately undermined by its dependency on the US dollar for oil trade. Later, Japan's semiconductor challenge was countered not just by tariffs (e.g., Plaza Accord, 301 investigations) but by binding it to US Treasury bonds. China presents a more complex, "embedded" challenger. While it holds vast dollar reserves and US debt like Japan, its industrial base is stronger and more diversified than the Soviet Union's. Surviving the initial 2018 trade war phase, the conflict has evolved into a "tech-financial war." The core battlefield is now the stock market. US tech stocks (AI, semiconductors) are treated as sovereign assets, buoyed by bipartisan national will. China is pushing to strengthen its own financial markets to convert industrial strength into financial power and fund its tech ambitions. Companies like ChangXin (semiconductors), Moonshot AI, and DJI compete not just for market share but as financial proxies for their respective systems. The new paradigm is moving from globally efficient monopolies (Apple, Google) towards companies that achieve monopolistic profits within their respective geopolitical spheres. This competition over "pricing power" and financial valuation in segmented markets defines the current era, making the stock market the primary arena for this tech-centric struggle.

marsbit30m ago

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

marsbit30m ago

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

RWA Weekly: European Banks Form Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network Covering July 24-31, 2026, the RWA sector saw a steady on-chain total value locked (TVL) of $36.8 billion, with holder count hitting a record high. However, stablecoin transfer volumes fell sharply (~30%), indicating low on-chain settlement demand. Key regulatory moves include South Korea advancing stablecoin legislation and a push to scrap crypto taxes, Kenya lowering capital requirements for stablecoin issuers, and Zimbabwe approving seven projects for its crypto sandbox. In project developments, BIS-led Project Agorá successfully tested cross-border payments with tokenized funds across six currencies. Ten major European financial institutions formed the RL1 blockchain cooperative to build tokenized asset infrastructure. Other notable updates: Aviva launched a tokenized dollar liquidity fund on XRPL, POSCO International tokenized commercial invoices on Injective, and a Brazilian farmer used tokenized cattle as collateral for a loan. Additional progress includes BNY Mellon migrating its core transfer agent operations to blockchain, Securitize gaining SEC investment advisor registration, and Tether’s compliant stablecoin USA₮ launching on Celo. Ondo Finance introduced Ondo Network, a new execution layer focused on speed and privacy, moving away from its initial chain plans. An analysis highlights that despite the growing scale of on-chain RWAs (~$32B), approximately 90% remain underutilized in DeFi, pointing to a critical challenge in unlocking liquidity and fostering real-world application beyond mere issuance.

marsbit31m ago

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

marsbit31m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy WIN

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing WINkLink (WIN) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy WINkLink (WIN) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your WINkLink (WIN)After purchasing your WINkLink (WIN), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade WINkLink (WIN)Easily trade WINkLink (WIN) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.6k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy WIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of WIN (WIN) are presented below.

活动图片