Clash Over Stablecoin Legislation: Big Banks Vs. The Crypto Industry

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-01-14Last updated on 2026-01-14

Abstract

The Senate Banking Committee's updated crypto market structure bill (CLARITY Act) has sparked a new battle over the GENIUS Act, which focuses on stablecoin regulation. Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger claims the "Big Bank lobby" is pressuring Congress to revisit settled stablecoin reward legislation to suppress competition, not due to emerging risks. She argues that big banks, controlling assets equivalent to 60% of US GDP, offer low savings yields (0.39%) compared to the Federal Funds rate (3.50%-3.75%), and lobby against technologies providing better consumer returns by invoking "systemic risk" claims. Expert Omid Malekan criticized the notion that stablecoin holders shouldn't earn yields, advocating that interest from Treasury bills should benefit average Americans rather than bank executives. He cited JPMorgan's $25 billion net interest income as evidence of banks profiting from low saver returns, dismissing concerns that interest-paying stablecoins would harm lending. Both advocate for policies prioritizing consumer choice and fair returns.

As the Senate Banking Committee unveiled the updated draft of the crypto market structure bill, known as the CLARITY Act, another critical battle is unfolding surrounding the GENIUS Act, which focuses on stablecoin regulations. The banking lobby is pressing for significant changes, particularly regarding stablecoin rewards.

Are Big Banks Disrupting Stablecoin Competition?

Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association and a prominent advocate for the crypto industry in Congress negotiations, took to social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to highlight the current state of discussions following the bipartisan passage of the GENIUS Act.

She claimed that the “Big Bank lobby” is pushing Congress to revisit settled legislation concerning stablecoin rewards, not due to emerging risks but rather to suppress competition that benefits consumers.

Mersinger stated, “When Big Banks face competition, they don’t improve services. They lobby to handicap alternatives. And the consumer suffers.”

The firm’s CEO pointed out that the average American savings account currently yields only 0.39%, while checking accounts offer an even lower rate of 0.07%. In contrast, the Federal Funds rate hovers between 3.50% and 3.75%.

She argued that this discrepancy is not merely a product of market forces but stems from a substantial barrier that the major banks have constructed, preventing customers from accessing better returns.

Mersinger emphasized that the dominance of the six largest US banks, which control assets equivalent to 60% of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), only reinforces this trend.

She further stressed that when new technologies arise that can provide consumers with superior returns, the banks’ immediate response is to invoke claims of “systemic risk” while lobbying against these advancements.

Ultimately, Mersinger and her colleagues are advocating for policies that prioritize consumer options. “We urge Congress to listen,” she implored, signaling the importance of the ongoing debate between the two sectors.

Expert Advocates For Fair Returns

Market expert Omid Malekan also weighed in, criticizing the notion that stablecoin holders should not earn yields, arguing that the interest revenue generated from taxpayer-backed Treasury bills should be directed to average Americans rather than lining the pockets of bank executives and shareholders.

Malekan called for a broader discussion on capping credit card interest rates and swipe fees, along with the implementation of a windfall profit tax on the net interest margins of banks. He asserted, “An industry this anti-competition and consumer choice should suffer the consequences.”

Support for Malekan’s view was reinforced by recent earnings reports from major banks. This morning, JPMorgan Chase announced $25 billion in net interest income, illustrating the profits generated by not providing higher returns to savers. Malekan dismissed claims that stablecoins paying interest would harm lending as unfounded.

The daily chart shows the surge in the total crypto market cap on Tuesday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

Related Questions

QWhat is the main conflict described in the article regarding the GENIUS Act?

AThe main conflict is between the big bank lobby and the crypto industry. The banking lobby is pushing Congress to revisit settled legislation on stablecoin rewards, which the crypto industry argues is an attempt to suppress competition rather than address any emerging risks.

QAccording to Summer Mersinger, what is the average yield on a US savings account and how does it compare to the Federal Funds rate?

AAccording to Summer Mersinger, the average US savings account yields 0.39% and the average checking account yields 0.07%. This is in stark contrast to the Federal Funds rate, which is between 3.50% and 3.75%.

QWhat argument does Omid Malekan make about who should benefit from the interest revenue generated by Treasury bills?

AOmid Malekan argues that the interest revenue generated from taxpayer-backed Treasury bills should be directed to average Americans, rather than going to bank executives and shareholders.

QWhat recent financial report was used to support the argument that banks are profiting from not providing higher returns to savers?

AA recent earnings report from JPMorgan Chase, which announced $25 billion in net interest income, was used to support the argument that banks are profiting from not providing higher returns to savers.

QWhat does Summer Mersinger claim is the typical response from big banks when new technologies offer consumers better returns?

ASummer Mersinger claims that when new technologies arise that can provide consumers with superior returns, the big banks' immediate response is to invoke claims of 'systemic risk' while lobbying against these advancements.

Related Reads

U.S. Stock Market Trend: Nasdaq Plunges 3.5% Intraday Before a Remarkable Recovery, All Eyes on CPI Tomorrow

"US Stock Market Trends: Nasdaq Plunges 3.5% Before Dramatic Recovery, Eyes on Tomorrow's CPI" On Tuesday, US markets experienced a wild swing. The Nasdaq initially surged nearly 0.7% before plummeting to a 3.5% intraday loss following a post by Donald Trump on Truth Social. He stated that Iran had shot down a US Apache helicopter in the Strait of Hormuz and that the US "must...respond." The index, however, staged a remarkable recovery in the final two hours, closing down only 0.97%, as subsequent remarks from Trump and Vice President Vance suggested a potential Iran deal within days. The S&P 500 fell 0.26%, while the Dow Jones gained 0.17%, supported by its non-tech components. This incident marked the first loss of a US military asset since tensions with Iran escalated in late February. Despite the event, crude oil prices fell sharply (WTI -3.93%) due to expectations of a near-term deal, OPEC+ plans to increase output, and fears that strong jobs data could lead to Fed rate hikes. Market attention is now laser-focused on the May CPI data release Wednesday morning. This report is seen as critical evidence for whether hot job growth is fueling inflation and will heavily influence expectations for the Federal Reserve's upcoming meeting. A hotter-than-expected reading could trigger further sell-offs, particularly in tech, while a cooler print could spark a significant rebound. The article notes a clear sector rotation, with money flowing out of tech (Nasdaq down over 5% in a week) into defensive sectors like healthcare and consumer staples. Other assets like gold and Bitcoin also remain under pressure. The overarching sentiment is one of "war fatigue," with markets desperately awaiting concrete results from the prolonged Iran negotiations rather than reacting to each new headline.

marsbit7m ago

U.S. Stock Market Trend: Nasdaq Plunges 3.5% Intraday Before a Remarkable Recovery, All Eyes on CPI Tomorrow

marsbit7m ago

Second Only to GPUs and Memory: MLCCs Are Becoming the Next Billion-Dollar Windfall for AI Computing Power

After GPU and memory, MLCC (Multi-Layer Ceramic Capacitors) is emerging as the next critical component in AI compute, potentially a multi-billion-dollar market. The article highlights a significant, industry-wide price increase for MLCCs, driven not by inventory cycles but by a fundamental, structural demand surge from AI and automotive sectors. AI servers require exponentially more MLCCs than traditional servers—from 2,000 to over 350,000 units per high-end AI rack—primarily to stabilize power for increasingly powerful, low-voltage GPUs. A key AI server's MLCC cost can reach thousands of dollars, making it the third-largest cost component after GPUs and memory. This demand is compounded by the automotive shift to EVs and advanced ADAS. Supply, however, struggles to keep up. Manufacturing high-end MLCCs involves extreme precision and faces six major barriers: proprietary technology, long customer certification cycles (12-18 months for AI), high capital intensity, patent thickets, specialized talent, and massive scale. Industry capacity grows at only ~10% annually, creating a persistent supply-demand gap projected to last until 2030. Three companies dominate this high-end market. **Murata** (40% global share) is the stable leader. **Samsung Electro-Mechanics** offers the highest growth elasticity with aggressive expansion. **Taiyo Yuden** is the purest MLCC play. While their current P/E ratios appear high, they are expected to compress rapidly as earnings surge, powered by significant pricing power and operational leverage. Key risks include a potential slowdown in AI capex, high valuations, competition from Chinese manufacturers in lower tiers, yen appreciation, and consumer electronics weakness. The article concludes that MLCCs are transforming from a commoditized component into a strategic, capacity-constrained asset essential for the AI-powered future.

marsbit37m ago

Second Only to GPUs and Memory: MLCCs Are Becoming the Next Billion-Dollar Windfall for AI Computing Power

marsbit37m ago

The First to Bring an AI OS to 1.4 Billion People Might Actually Be WeChat?

WeChat has introduced a significant AI update, allowing mini-program developers to integrate their services with WeChat AI. Developers can choose an "automatic mode," where WeChat AI autonomously analyzes and operates mini-programs without additional coding, or a "development mode" for creating customized skills. This move effectively transforms WeChat's vast ecosystem—including millions of mini-programs, WeChat Pay, and official accounts—into an execution layer for AI. The technical documentation reveals that WeChat's approach aligns with industry standards like MCP (Model Context Protocol) and incorporates practical lessons from AI-agent development. Key design principles include a clear "attention weight" system for API calls and a "fact + action" response structure to ensure reliable operations. Unlike Apple's Siri, which struggles with third-party app integration, WeChat's centralized control over mini-program code provides a "God's-eye view," enabling seamless AI orchestration across services. This development revives the concept of "WeChat OS," where the app could function as a natural-language-operated platform for daily tasks—from booking flights to ordering food—all within a chat interface. While challenges remain in areas like payment security and user trust, WeChat's existing service network and massive user base position it uniquely to advance AI agents from conversation to actionable assistance, potentially making complex tasks feel effortless for its 1.432 billion monthly active users.

marsbit1h ago

The First to Bring an AI OS to 1.4 Billion People Might Actually Be WeChat?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片