Bubblemaps challenges PEPE’s fair launch, alleges 30% of genesis supply bundled

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-11Last updated on 2025-12-11

Abstract

Bubblemaps has challenged the "fair launch" narrative of memecoin PEPE, alleging that approximately 30% of its genesis supply was bundled by a single entity at its April 2023 launch. This contradicts the project’s claim of being a "coin for the people" with no presale allocations. According to the analysis, the same wallet cluster sold $2 million worth of tokens the day after launch, creating significant sell pressure that prevented PEPE from reaching a $12 billion market cap. The token's price has fallen over 81% in the past year. The findings were uncovered using Bubblemaps' Time Travel feature, a forensic tool designed to detect insider activity and prevent rug pulls. The report highlights broader concerns about memecoin scams, citing examples like the WOLF token, which crashed 99% in hours.

Blockchain data is casting doubt on the “for the people” launch narrative of memecoin Pepe, with new analysis suggesting that nearly a third of the initial supply was held by a single entity and contributed to heavy early selling pressure.

About 30% of the Pepe (PEPE) token supply was bundled at launch in April 2023, blockchain data visualization platform Bubblemaps claimed Wednesday in a post on X, adding that investors were “lied to.”

The same wallet cluster sold $2 million worth of PEPE tokens the day after launch, adding significant sell pressure that stopped the token from surpassing the $12 billion milestone, according to Bubblemaps.

That concentration of the genesis supply contrasts with Pepe’s original branding as a “coin for the people.” The project’s website says the token launched “in stealth” with no presale allocations.

Source: Bubblemaps

Related: Silk Road-linked Bitcoin wallets move $3M to new address

PEPE’s price fell 5.7% in the past 24 hours and is down over 81% in the past year, according to CoinMarketCap data.

PEPE/USD, 1-year chart. Source: CoinMarketCap.com

Adding to investor concerns, Pepe’s website was exploited earlier in December, temporarily redirecting users to a malicious inferno drainer, a scam tool used for phishing attacks, wallet drainers and social engineering scams.

Despite PEPE’s downside, some crypto traders managed to make millions of dollars on the memecoin.

In March, one trader turned an initial investment of $2,000 into $43 million by holding PEPE. The trader realized a $10 million profit on his position, having held through a 74% decline from PEPE’s all-time high before selling.

Related: Crypto nears its ‘Netscape moment’ as industry approaches inflection point

Forensics tool targets insider-heavy launches

The latest findings were uncovered through Bubblemaps’ Time Travel feature, a forensic-grade analytics tool launched earlier in May, that enables Web3 users to reconstruct the historical distribution of tokens, aiming to detect early insider activity or coordinated accumulation efforts to prevent rug pulls and memecoin scams.

Spotting tokens with a large portion of the supply concentrated across a few wallets can help investors detect scams such as rug pulls, where insiders remove liquidity or stage a mass sell-off, resulting in a steep price collapse that leaves investors with worthless tokens.

Bubblemaps played a key role in uncovering suspicious wallet activity related to multiple memecoins, including the Melania token and an array of fake Eric Trump-themed memecoins.

In one of this year’s most damaging rug pulls, the Wolf of Wall Street-inspired WOLF token crashed 99% within a few hours, wiping out nearly $42 million of market capitalization on March 16.

Source: Bubblemaps

The token was created by Hayden Davis, the co-creator of the Official Melania Meme (MELANIA) and the Libra token.

Magazine: Memecoin degeneracy is funding groundbreaking anti-aging research

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

The article analyzes the concept of "real-world asset" (RWA) tokenization, arguing that while tokenizing assets on-chain is a useful step, it is far from transformative on its own. The author compares it to placing a barcode on a shipping container—it enables identification but does not build the necessary market infrastructure. The core argument is that true value emerges not from tokenization, but from integrating these tokens into DeFi systems where they can be valued, financed, hedged, traded, and liquidated under stress. Key challenges identified include: 1. **Multiple Time Clocks**: A fundamental tension exists between blockchain's 24/7 settlement and the slower, business-hour-dependent processes of traditional markets, custody, and redemption. This "duration mismatch" can create dangerous liquidity gaps during crises. 2. **Liquidity Misconceptions**: True liquidity is not measured by Total Value Locked (TVL) or trading pairs, but by the ability to exit a position within a required timeframe at an acceptable price. It requires analyzing multiple exit paths and stress-testing scenarios. 3. **Leverage and Risk**: Leverage unlocks economic utility (e.g., using tokenized assets as collateral) but also introduces fragility. Risk models must account for more than asset volatility, incorporating factors like legal enforceability, oracle freshness, and market structure. Paradoxically, a "safer" asset like tokenized Treasury bonds could require a higher collateral discount than ETH due to slower, less-proven liquidation mechanisms. 4. **A Risk Graph**: RWA risk should be modeled as a network of interconnected dependencies (e.g., issuers, custodians, oracles, stablecoin pools), not a single score. Failures can propagate through this graph, turning operational issues into systemic liquidity crises. The article states that tokenized government bonds are merely an entry point, while more complex frontiers like computing power and energy assets present greater challenges and opportunities. It also examines the interplay and risks between tokenized stocks and perpetual futures contracts. The conclusion is that the future lies not in "tokenizing everything," but in building robust market layers where tokenized rights become resilient financial primitives within a programmable capital system. The token is just the barcode; the market is the machine.

marsbit11m ago

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

marsbit11m ago

The End of Mathematics: 40 Top Mathematicians Gather at Secret OpenAI Meeting

In August 2026, OpenAI hosted a closed-door summit with approximately 40 leading mathematicians, including recent Fields Medalist Jacob Tsimerman and OpenAI researcher Sébastien Bubeck. The meeting, spurred by a series of recent AI breakthroughs in mathematics, grappled with the potential existential threat AI poses to the field. The backdrop includes several high-profile AI achievements: OpenAI models disproving long-standing conjectures like the unit distance problem, generating 10 new mathematical discoveries, and Anthropic's Claude aiding in constructing complex multidimensional objects. These results often bypass traditional academic pipelines, appearing directly on social media. The mathematical community is divided. Over 3000 researchers signed the "Leiden Statement," advocating for responsible AI use and verification. Others resist AI entirely to preserve human-centric mathematics. A key concern is AI's current inability to *explain* proofs, particularly the difficult steps, which is central to mathematical understanding. At the summit, Bubeck outlined four potential futures: mathematics becoming like collaborative software engineering, a compute-driven field like physics, a curatorial exercise where humans interpret AI output, or a mass transition of mathematicians into AI safety. While emphasizing that "mathematics only makes sense when mathematicians learn from it," no consensus was reached. The event highlights a profound moment of reflection. As AI demonstrates increasing competence in solving complex problems, mathematicians are forced to question their future role and the very meaning of their discipline.

marsbit16m ago

The End of Mathematics: 40 Top Mathematicians Gather at Secret OpenAI Meeting

marsbit16m ago

Anthropic's New Models 'Catch the Gossip', The Strongest Fable 5 Unexpectedly Falls Flat

Anthropic has been discovered working on two new, previously unknown models codenamed "Marshmallow" (claude-marshmallow-eap) and "Melon" (claude-melon-eap), with early tests showing Marshmallow potentially surpassing Claude Opus 5 in conversational naturalness. Their emergence coincides with surprising new data revealing that Anthropic's flagship Fable 5 model, released two months ago as its strongest and most expensive offering, is being largely ignored by the enterprise market. According to spending data from Ramp tracking over 70,000 US companies, Fable 5 accounts for only about 11% of total token spending on Anthropic's models. This pales in comparison to OpenAI's flagship GPT-5.6 Sol, which commands roughly 25% of token spending in the same period. The tepid adoption is largely attributed to Fable 5's extremely high cost—double that of Opus 4.8 and ten times that of Haiku 4.5—without delivering proportionally superior performance for most business applications. Compounding the issue, the later-released Claude Opus 5, priced at half the cost of Fable 5, has achieved comparable or even better results in key benchmarks like programming and knowledge work, quickly surpassing Fable 5 in enterprise spending share. Furthermore, the rapid rise of powerful, low-cost open-source models—whose token usage share surged from 11% in April to 62% in August while costing less than 4% of enterprise AI budgets—applies additional pressure. Analysts suggest the sudden appearance of Marshmallow and Melon may be an urgent move by Anthropic to address this gap in its lineup. The goal is to offer models that are not only powerful but also cost-effective enough for businesses to adopt widely and sustainably, moving beyond a flagship that serves more as a showcase than a workhorse.

marsbit16m ago

Anthropic's New Models 'Catch the Gossip', The Strongest Fable 5 Unexpectedly Falls Flat

marsbit16m ago

Three Months After the Passing of Little Dog Rosie, Her Medical Records Transformed into an AI Healthcare Company

Three months after the passing of his dog Rosie, AI entrepreneur Paul S. Conyngham secured $4 million in seed funding from Founders Fund for his new startup, Gamgee. The company aims to industrialize the experimental, AI-assisted process he pioneered to create a personalized mRNA cancer vaccine for Rosie, who suffered from mast cell tumors. With no formal biology background, Conyngham used AI tools like ChatGPT and AlphaFold to analyze Rosie's tumor DNA, identify target neoantigens, and design a custom mRNA vaccine sequence. Laboratory partners at UNSW produced the vaccine. Initial treatment showed tumor reduction, but Rosie's cancer later recurred and she was euthanized. Gamgee's goal is to streamline this "N-of-1" approach into a repeatable service for canine cancer patients, handling sequencing, vaccine design, production, and delivery. Clinical trials are planned in Australia in collaboration with research institutions. The company also eyes a longer-term vision of establishing personalized, mRNA-based medicine across species. The story highlights the broader challenge in personalized cancer treatment: compressing the entire timeline from design and regulatory approval to manufacturing and administration to match the patient's prognosis. While AI can accelerate target discovery, the remaining logistical and regulatory hurdles are significant. The article concludes by emphasizing that, for now, consulting qualified veterinary oncologists remains the responsible path for pet owners.

marsbit25m ago

Three Months After the Passing of Little Dog Rosie, Her Medical Records Transformed into an AI Healthcare Company

marsbit25m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片