Bloomberg Reports Twice, Hyperliquid Re-enters Wall Street's View

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-04Last updated on 2026-03-04

Abstract

On February 28, during U.S. market off-hours, Hyperliquid’s crude oil perpetual contracts saw significant price and volume movements in response to geopolitical tensions involving Iran, as reported by open-source intelligence. The platform’s 24/7 trading capability allows continuous price discovery, especially during weekends when traditional markets are closed—highlighted in two recent Bloomberg articles. This has drawn Wall Street attention as crypto and traditional finance increasingly intersect. Hyperliquid’s native token HYPE has decoupled from Bitcoin, gaining 13% during the event, partly due to its tokenomics: 50% of trading fees from its HIP-3 protocol are used to buy back HYPE. The platform also saw substantial activity during earlier precious metal rallies, with silver volumes reaching $1.2 billion. However, challenges remain. While Hyperliquid performs well for retail-sized orders, its depth and slippage lag behind traditional venues like COMEX, especially during high volatility. Institutional adoption requires improvements in KYC, liquidity models, and risk infrastructure. Despite this, Hyperliquid’s ability to provide real-time, off-shore risk pricing positions it as a growing force in the evolution toward always-on financial markets.

At 1:12 AM EST on February 28, during the exchange's off-hours, trading volume on Polymarket's prediction contract regarding whether the U.S. would strike Iran surged.

At 1:13 AM, the first open-source intelligence about the airstrike appeared on Twitter.

One minute later, the price and trading volume of crude oil perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid's Trade.xyz followed with unusual movements.

After the headline news developed, the crude oil perpetual contract on the Hyperliquid platform rose by 5%, with open interest (OI) climbing to $50 million. The price of HYPE increased by 13%, leading the gains among the top 25 tokens by market cap.

24/7 Trading

Of the ten high-volatility macroeconomic events over the past year, eight erupted on weekends. Hyperliquid's around-the-clock price discovery mechanism is attracting attention from traditional financial markets.

In two recent reports on Hyperliquid, Bloomberg pointed out that as the crypto market becomes increasingly intertwined with traditional finance, Wall Street has begun closely monitoring platforms like Hyperliquid. During weekends when traditional markets are closed, on-chain derivatives provide continuous risk pricing capabilities. Bloomberg cited market participants' views, stating that this全天候 pricing mechanism is a structural upgrade that enhances market efficiency. The unusual market movements over the weekend validated a trend: around-the-clock on-chain trading for all asset classes is an inevitable direction for financial market development.

Decoupling

As the HIP-3, which supports traditional market trading, grows stronger, HYPE's price performance has long begun to decouple from Bitcoin, the default benchmark of the crypto market. When the news of the attack broke, Bitcoin's price initially fell and then fluctuated. In contrast, HYPE, which caters to trading demands for precious metals and stocks, demonstrated independent momentum.

In late January, when silver broke through $100 and gold surpassed $5500, the trading volume for silver alone on the HIP-3 exchange tradexyz reached $1.2 billion, driving HYPE up by 55% over three days, while Bitcoin only rose by 3% during the same period.

Tokenomics explains the reason for HYPE's strong performance. Hyperliquid's HIP-3 protocol stipulates that 50% of all fee revenue generated by HIP-3 exchanges flows into the Hyperliquid Official Aid Fund and is used to repurchase HYPE. Macro volatility drives trading volume, increased trading volume boosts repurchase scale, bringing strong buying pressure to the HYPE token.

HYPE holders are not only betting on the growth of Hyperliquid as an offshore Perp DEX but are also going long on geopolitical uncertainty.

Hyperliquid is merely the clearest expression of this narrative so far, and the market is finally starting to reflect this.

Gap

Despite this, on-chain derivatives still have a distance to go to meet traditional institutional standards.

Hyperliquid's current advantage lies in small to medium-sized retail orders. According to research by Blockworks Research, during regular trading hours, the spread of its silver contracts is comparable to that of COMEX micro contracts. However, there is a significant gap in depth. COMEX's order book depth within a ±5 basis point range reaches $13 million, while Hyperliquid's is only around $230,000.

In extreme crash scenarios, the tail risk of on-chain liquidity degradation is greater. A 1% trade in Hyperliquid silver can experience slippage of over 50 basis points, whereas COMEX maintains better execution costs under such conditions.

Currently, Hyperliquid's liquidity and funding rate models do not yet meet the needs of large funds. To compete at the institutional level, on-chain platforms need to address KYC issues and even establish technical and cooperative frameworks that match traditional clearing institutions. Many industry participants still believe that if the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) were to launch 24/7 trading, it would have inherent hedging advantages and a foundation of trust.

Nevertheless, the traditional financial market's model of controlling risk by physically shutting down during off-hours indeed shows limitations. The ability to continuously price risk without waiting for the Monday market open is the core value of offshore exchanges like Hyperliquid.

The shift of market pricing power to on-chain will be a long-term process. But one must have dreams, what if they come true?

Related Questions

QWhat is the core value proposition of Hyperliquid as an offshore exchange, according to the Bloomberg reports mentioned in the article?

AIts core value proposition is the ability to provide continuous, 24/7 risk pricing for assets, even when traditional markets are closed, which is seen as a structural upgrade for market efficiency.

QHow did the HYPE token's price action decouple from Bitcoin's during the recent news of the airstrike?

AWhen the airstrike news broke, Bitcoin's price initially fell and entered a period of volatility, while HYPE, which caters to trading demands for assets like precious metals and stocks, demonstrated an independent and stronger upward price movement.

QWhat mechanism in the Hyperliquid tokenomics creates buying pressure for the HYPE token during periods of high market volatility?

AThe HIP-3 protocol stipulates that 50% of all fee revenue generated on its exchanges is sent to an official aid fund to buy back and burn HYPE tokens. High volatility increases trading volume, which in turn increases the scale of these buybacks, creating significant buying pressure.

QWhat are the main limitations or gaps that Hyperliquid and other on-chain derivatives platforms currently face in competing with traditional institutions like CME?

AThe main limitations are significantly lower market depth, higher slippage (especially during extreme volatility), a liquidity model not yet suited for large funds, and the need to address KYC requirements and establish technical and cooperative architectures that match traditional clearing institutions.

QWhat specific event was cited in the article where HYPE's price significantly outperformed Bitcoin's, and what was the primary driver?

AIn late January, when silver broke above $100 and gold broke above $5500, HYPE rose 55% in three days while Bitcoin only rose 3%. The primary driver was the $1.2 billion in trading volume on the silver single-asset contract on Hyperliquid's trade.xyz, fueled by the macro volatility.

Related Reads

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

The article explains that the key to profiting on Polymarket, a prediction market platform, lies not just predicting real-world events correctly, but in meticulously understanding the specific rules that govern how each market will be resolved. It illustrates this with examples, such as a market on Venezuela's 2026 leader, where the official rules defining "officially holds" the office overruled the intuitive answer of who was in practical control. Other examples include debates over the definition of a "token" or what constitutes an "agreement." The core argument is that a "reality vs. rules" gap creates pricing discrepancies that savvy traders ("车头" or "whales") exploit. The platform has a formal dispute resolution process managed by UMA token holders to settle ambiguous outcomes. This process involves proposal submission, a challenge window, a discussion period, and a final vote. However, the article highlights a critical flaw in this system compared to a traditional court: the lack of separation between the arbiters (UMA voters) and the interested parties (traders with financial stakes in the outcome). This conflict of interest undermines the discussion phase, leads to herd mentality, and results in opaque final decisions without explanatory rulings. Consequently, the system lacks a body of precedent, making it difficult for users to learn from past disputes. The ultimate takeaway is that success on Polymarket requires a lawyer-like scrutiny of the rules to identify and capitalize on the cognitive gap between how events appear and how they are contractually defined for settlement.

marsbit1h ago

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片