AI Industry Welcomes a Cash-Rich Tether

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-05Last updated on 2026-01-05

Abstract

Tether, the company behind the stablecoin USDT, reported a staggering $13 billion profit in 2024, significantly outperforming major AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic, both of which incurred substantial losses. With only 150 employees, Tether achieved a per capita output 60 times greater than OpenAI’s. Its business model is simple: for every USDT issued, Tether holds one US dollar, primarily investing these reserves in U.S. Treasury bonds. It earns the interest income without paying any to USDT holders. In 2024, interest alone contributed $7 billion to its profits. Now, Tether is aggressively investing in AI. It loaned over $600 million to Northern Data, Europe’s largest GPU cloud provider, acquiring what is effectively an AI training base. It also released QVAC Genesis, a massive open-source AI training dataset. Furthermore, Tether invested $200 million in Blackrock Neurotech, a pioneering brain-computer interface company. Additional investments in robotics could bring its total AI-related spending to nearly $2 billion. Tether’s move into AI may be driven by both anxiety over declining Treasury yields and ambition to establish itself as a tech leader. Ironically, it promotes "decentralized AI" despite being a highly centralized company itself. While OpenAI and Anthropic struggle with profitability and continuous fundraising, Tether leverages its highly profitable stablecoin business to fund its AI ambitions risk-free, making a paradoxical case that the best business m...

Written by: Curry, Deep Tide TechFlow

Tether earned $13 billion in 2024.

You might not have a clear idea of this number. Let me put it another way: OpenAI had a revenue of $3.7 billion in 2024 but lost $5 billion. Anthropic had a revenue of $1 billion and also lost $5 billion.

The combined losses of these two legitimate AI companies still fall short of what Tether made in a year.

Tether has 150 employees, while OpenAI has over 3,000. The per capita output difference is roughly:

60 times.

How does Tether make money? When you buy 1 USDT, they take $1 and use it to buy U.S. Treasury bonds. The interest from the bonds goes to them, not you.

The essence of this is that Tether doesn't pay interest. Banks pay interest on savings, but Tether doesn't. You hold your money as USDT and get zero interest. They use your money to buy U.S. Treasury bonds, earning $7 billion in interest in 2024 alone.

150 people managing over $130 billion in Treasury bonds, doing nothing, and the interest just rolls in.

Who wouldn't want to lie back with a business like this?

But with so much money, it has to be spent. Tether has chosen a direction:

AI.

And they’re not just casually investing in a few projects.

First, computing power.

Running AI requires GPUs—the more, the better, and the more expensive, the better. Tether lent over $600 million to a German company called Northern Data.

What does this company do?

It’s Europe’s largest GPU cloud service provider. They have over 10,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs—the same ones OpenAI used to train GPT, each costing $20,000 to $30,000.

The cluster formed by these GPUs ranks 26th in the global TOP500 supercomputer list. Tether’s $600 million investment essentially buys an AI training base in Europe.

Next, data.

Training AI requires feeding it data. Last week, Tether released a dataset called QVAC Genesis, covering 19 disciplines including mathematics, physics, chemistry, and computer science. They claim it’s the world’s largest open-source AI training dataset.

Keep in mind that OpenAI and Anthropic’s training data are not public. Tether is releasing it for free, available to anyone.

Then comes the more sci-fi part.

In April 2024, Tether spent $200 million to acquire a company called Blackrock Neurotech. The name includes "Blackrock," but it has no relation to the asset management firm BlackRock.

This company works on brain-computer interfaces. They implant chips in people’s brains, allowing paralyzed individuals to type with their thoughts, control wheelchairs, and operate robotic arms. It sounds like science fiction, but they started in 2008—eight years before Musk’s Neuralink.

How impressive is this company?

Globally, 35 people have brain-computer interface chips implanted, and 31 of them use Blackrock’s technology. In 2016, a fully paralyzed patient used their device to control a robotic arm and fist-bump Obama. The chip implanted in the sensory cortex allowed him to "feel" the president’s hand.

Last year, this brain-computer interface company enabled an ALS patient to "speak" again. The chip in his brain translated his thoughts into speech at a rate of 62 words per minute.

Tether spent $200 million to become the majority shareholder of this company.

Combined, Tether has invested nearly $1 billion in AI-related fields. Rumor has it they’re also negotiating with a German robotics company, offering $1.2 billion. If that goes through, the total investment could reach $2 billion.

What does this mean?

Anthropic raised $3.5 billion in funding throughout 2024. Tether’s investment alone is almost half of what a top-tier AI company raised in a year.

OpenAI spent $6.7 billion on R&D in the first half of 2025. Tether, with just a fraction of its profits, can play the role of a big spender in the AI world.

Why is a stablecoin company diving into AI?

We think there are two possibilities.

The first is anxiety. The Fed is cutting interest rates, and Treasury yields are falling. In 2024, they made $7 billion in interest just by lying back. From 2025 onward, things might not be as rosy. Even money-printing machines need new stories.

The second is ambition. The whole world is talking about AI—investors, media, politicians. If you say you’re a stablecoin company, no one bats an eye. But if you say you’re working on AI, brain-computer interfaces, and humanoid robots, you become:

A tech leader.

The most amusing part?

Tether’s AI efforts come with slogans like "decentralization," "local operation," and "returning intelligence to individuals."

But Tether itself is the most centralized company in the crypto world.

They decide how many coins to issue, how much reserve to hold. In ten years of operation, they’ve never been audited. Only they know where users’ money is.

Now, this company wants to teach the world what "decentralized AI" means.

It’s a bit like a casino owner teaching people how to quit gambling.

Not that it’s impossible.

After all, OpenAI is still losing money and isn’t expected to break even until 2029. Anthropic is in a similar boat, targeting 2028. Sam Altman is fundraising everywhere, and Dario Amodei is doing the same. The two companies have burned through $10 billion combined and are still telling stories to investors.

Tether doesn’t need to tell stories. The money is already in their pocket.

What’s the biggest challenge in the entire AI industry? The business model.

How to make money? No one knows. When will it make money? No one knows. Can it make money? No one knows.

Tether doesn’t have this problem. Their business model is:

Not doing AI.

They use the profits from stablecoins to invest in AI. If it works out, it’s foresight. If it fails, it’s a learning expense. Either way, it doesn’t affect their core business.

Those doing AI are losing money; those not doing AI are making money. Those doing AI are fundraising; those not doing AI are investing.

In 2026, the best AI business model might just be not doing AI.

First, get your money-printing machine in order.

Related Questions

QHow much profit did Tether make in 2024, and how does it compare to major AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic?

ATether made a profit of $13 billion in 2024. In comparison, OpenAI had revenue of $3.7 billion but lost $5 billion, while Anthropic had revenue of $1 billion and also lost $5 billion. Combined, the losses of these two major AI companies were less than Tether's profit.

QWhat is Tether's core business model that generates such significant profits?

ATether's core business model involves issuing the USDT stablecoin. When users buy 1 USDT, Tether receives 1 US dollar and uses it to purchase U.S. Treasury bonds. Tether earns the interest from these bonds but does not pay any interest to USDT holders, allowing it to profit significantly from the interest income.

QWhat are some key AI-related investments Tether has made, and how much has it invested?

ATether has invested nearly $1 billion in AI-related areas. Key investments include over $600 million in loans to Northern Data, Europe's largest GPU cloud service provider with over 10,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs; $200 million to acquire brain-computer interface company Blackrock Neurotech; and the release of the QVAC Genesis dataset. It is also reportedly negotiating a $1.2 billion deal with a German robotics company, which would bring total investments to around $2 billion.

QWhy is Tether, a stablecoin company, investing heavily in AI technologies?

ATether is investing in AI due to two main reasons: anxiety over declining U.S. Treasury bond yields, which threaten its primary revenue source, and ambition to position itself as a tech leader in the rapidly growing AI field, enhancing its reputation beyond being just a stablecoin issuer.

QWhat ironic contrast does the article highlight between Tether's actions and its stated AI goals?

AThe article highlights the irony that Tether, which is promoting 'decentralized AI,' 'local operation,' and 'returning intelligence to individuals,' is itself one of the most centralized companies in the crypto space. It has full control over USDT issuance, reserve management, and has never undergone an audit, making its advocacy for decentralization seem contradictory.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1h ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片