After Two Years of Waiting, Apple's AI for China Finally Passes Regulatory Filing, Integrates with Qwen

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-15Last updated on 2026-07-15

Abstract

China's cyberspace authority has approved seven mobile on-device generative AI services for public offering, including Apple Intelligence, Huawei Celia AI, OPPO AndesGPT, vivo BlueOS AI, Xiaomi Hyper AI, Samsung Galaxy AI, and Nubia's Doubao model. This marks the largest single batch of such approvals in China. Apple's AI service, arriving two years after its global announcement at WWDC 2024, will integrate Alibaba's Qwen model for Chinese users on iOS, iPadOS, macOS, and visionOS, offering text/image understanding and content generation without switching apps. An accidental early release of Apple Intelligence in China in March revealed its strengths in on-device speed and privacy, but also limitations in handling complex tasks compared to cloud-based models. The official approval resolves the compliance hurdle. Apple's delay in launching AI features in China has been cited as a factor affecting its recent competitive pressure in the market, where local rivals have already integrated advanced AI. While the global version of Apple's new Siri AI uses Google's Gemini, the China version will be powered by Alibaba Qwen. The final step for users is awaiting the actual integration of these features in future iOS updates.

Just now, the Cyberspace Administration of China announced: Apple Intelligence, Huawei Celia AI Model, OPPO AndesGPT Model, vivo BlueVivo On-Device Model, Xiaomi HyperMind AI, Samsung Galaxy AI, and Nubia Doubao Mobile Model — 7 on-device generative AI services for mobile phones have passed the regulatory filing.

Announcement on Releasing Filing Information for 7 On-Device Generative AI Services for Mobile Phones

This is the largest collective approval in the domestic on-device mobile AI field to date.

Counting from its debut at WWDC in June 2024, Chinese users have waited two years for Apple AI.

Alibaba's Qwen will be integrated as the AI capability into Apple Intelligence, providing Chinese users of iOS, iPadOS, macOS, and visionOS with abilities like text and image understanding, content generation, and more.

In response to this news, Alibaba stated:

Alibaba's Qwen will be integrated as the AI capability into Apple Intelligence, delivering intelligent experiences to Chinese users of iOS, iPadOS, macOS, and visionOS.

Users can directly experience Qwen's text and image understanding, content generation, and other capabilities on Apple devices without needing to switch between apps.

The filing is the compliance admission ticket, but even before Apple obtained this ticket, Chinese users had experienced a brief, preliminary version.

The Previously Leaked Test Version of Apple AI Left Much to Be Desired

On March 31 this year, the day before Apple's 50th anniversary, an "Apple Intelligence and Siri" entry appeared in the Settings page of iPhones in China.

There was no launch event, no press release. The feature went live and was quickly taken down.

Bloomberg journalist Mark Gurman judged it to be an accidental push: Apple wouldn't launch its AI for China without any promotional activity, wouldn't choose the early hours of the morning in China to go live, and the visual recognition was calling on a Google engine rather than a domestic one, which is also unreasonable for China. Regulatory approval had not yet been granted at that time.

https://x.com/markgurman/status/2038701276699967554

The hands-on results from that brief appearance can be summarized in two words: fast, but rough.

The speed of the on-device model was the most immediate perception.

Text polishing, information summarization, AI erasure — responses were almost instantaneous.

A 200-word draft clicked to "Change to Professional Tone" produced results in less than two seconds.

The Image Playground supported generating images from text descriptions, producing images in three to five seconds, but the phone noticeably heated up.

All processing was done locally, with no data uploaded to the cloud, ensuring privacy — at the cost of accuracy.

Summarizing complex long texts would miss key information; tone rewriting occasionally produced unnatural expressions.

AI erasure worked okay on simple backgrounds, but with complex scenes, it showed issues like residual shadows, blurred edges, and broken textures.

Writing tools, translation, visual recognition — each was usable, each had a noticeable gap compared to competitors using cloud-based large models.

Apple made a trade-off between privacy and performance, choosing the former.

Although the leaked version in March was taken down at lightning speed in less than a day, it prematurely revealed the capability boundaries of Apple Intelligence for China: on-device models are fast, protect privacy, but depth and accuracy require supplementation by cloud models.

Previously, there was no clear, reliable information confirming which model was actually integrated.

Seven Approved, Apple Late by Two Years

Apple wasn't alone in passing the filing.

Also receiving admission tickets on the same day were Huawei, OPPO, vivo, Xiaomi, Samsung, and Nubia — the on-device AI of 7 phone manufacturers collectively approved.

Nubia's Doubao Mobile Model is expected to debut during WAIC.

For Apple, the cost of being late is already written in its financial reports.

iPhone sales in the Chinese market have been under continuous pressure. Cook previously admitted in an earnings call that the absence of Apple Intelligence was a reason for the decline in competitiveness.

Huawei, Xiaomi, and OPPO have long made AI features standard on flagships. Some brands have even integrated models like DeepSeek , widening the experience gap.

Previously, at WWDC 26, Apple showcased the new-generation Siri AI developed in collaboration with Google and based on Gemini, supporting cross-app contextual awareness and natural conversation, even capable of pulling up email and calendar information in real-time during calls.

However, at that time, Apple also made it clear: the new Siri AI would not immediately land in the Chinese market.

https://x.com/markgurman/status/2064047700488655019

The foundational AI capability for the Chinese version is Alibaba's Qwen , which is different from the technology stack used in the overseas version.

Apple has not given any promises regarding the official launch timeline or the completeness of features.

The filing resolves the compliance issue, but between filing and product launch, there are still engineering steps like version adaptation, feature tailoring, and model optimization to complete.

For users of iPhones in China, judging the true value of this AI admission ticket simply requires attention to: whether Apple Intelligence appears in the next iOS update log and how many features are retained.

Until then, the two-year wait is just one step away from being over.

This article is from the WeChat public account "New Zhiyuan", author: ASI Apocalypse

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main news regarding Apple's AI services in China as reported in the article?

AThe main news is that Apple's 'Apple Intelligence' AI service for the Chinese market, along with AI services from six other smartphone manufacturers, has officially passed regulatory filing in China. Its capabilities will be integrated with Alibaba's Tongyi Qianwen model.

QWhich Chinese company's AI model will power Apple Intelligence for users in China?

AAlibaba's Tongyi Qianwen (Qianwen) AI model will provide the AI capabilities for Apple Intelligence on iOS, iPadOS, macOS, and visionOS devices for users in China.

QWhat was the issue with the Apple AI test version that briefly appeared on iPhones in China in March?

AThe test version, which was likely an accidental release, was characterized as fast but rough. It performed operations on-device for privacy, but this resulted in lower accuracy and depth compared to cloud-based models, with issues like missing key information in summaries and imperfect AI object removal.

QWhy did Apple's AI delay pose a problem for the company in China according to the article?

AAccording to the article, the delay in launching Apple Intelligence in China negatively impacted iPhone sales. Apple CEO Tim Cook acknowledged that the absence of competitive AI features was a reason for the declining competitiveness of iPhones in the Chinese market, where rivals like Huawei and Xiaomi had already integrated advanced AI into their flagships.

QHow is the Apple Intelligence service for China different from the version announced for other markets?

AThe Chinese version of Apple Intelligence uses Alibaba's Tongyi Qianwen as its AI foundation, whereas the version showcased for other markets at WWDC 26 is based on a partnership with Google and its Gemini model. The technical stacks and capabilities are therefore different.

Related Reads

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

Title: Upbit's Rushed Counterattack to Reclaim Stablecoin Market Share Facing a dramatic shift in South Korea's stablecoin market, leading exchange Upbit launched a promotional campaign from July 26 to August 9, waiving the 0.05% trading fee for stablecoins paired with the Korean Won (KRW) and rapidly listing new stablecoins like RLUSD and USDG. This move is a direct response to its plummeting market share in this sector. Historically a duopoly with Bithumb, the market has been reshaped since October 2025 when Coinone permanently removed fees for USDC trading. By June 2026, Coinone led with 34.8% of stablecoin volume, followed by Bithumb (31.1%) and Upbit (30.1%). This contrasts sharply with the overall crypto market, where Upbit commands 60%. The data shows stablecoin demand is highly sensitive to fees, as users primarily buy them to transfer capital overseas for derivatives trading or forex arbitrage. South Korean exchanges have seen a net outflow of stablecoins for 18 consecutive months, totaling approximately 14.9 trillion KRW, underscoring their role as a cross-border capital conduit. Upbit's limited-time promotion initially boosted its daily stablecoin volume by 162%, but the surge was almost entirely in USDT (98.1% of volume). The newly listed stablecoins saw negligible, fleeting interest. Furthermore, the promotional effect quickly waned in the second week, with volume dropping 33% on weekdays. A concurrent weakening of the KRW also contributed to the trading spike, independent of the fee waiver. The analysis suggests that once the promotion ends, Upbit is unlikely to retain its temporary gains unless it matches Coinone's permanent zero-fee policy, forcing a choice between market share and fee revenue. Upbit's strategic push may be less about immediate profit and more about preparing for future regulatory shifts. With South Korea's *Digital Asset Basic Act* on the horizon, which will regulate KRW-backed stablecoins, and following Dunamu's (Upbit's parent) integration into Naver Financial to build a payment ecosystem, securing a dominant position in the dollar stablecoin distribution channel holds long-term strategic value. However, potential regulatory conflicts could prevent Upbit from listing a future Naver-issued KRW stablecoin, making the current fight for dollar stablecoin flow even more critical.

marsbit1h ago

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

marsbit1h ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, argues that Bitcoin fundamentally changes how wealth is stored and transferred by transforming digital scarcity into economic value. He describes Bitcoin as the first digital monetary network, combining computers, digital networks, and cryptography. It digitizes monetary assets, allowing their supply to be controlled by public protocols rather than institutions, thus converting economic value into information transmissible over global networks. Comparing Bitcoin to gold, Saylor states that while increasing Bitcoin's supply is harder, its integration with software and transfer is easier. He highlights Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism, which ties it to the physical world by consuming real energy to secure the ledger, making past transactions immutable. This creates a shared security system involving miners, energy companies, and investors. Saylor suggests "digital monetary energy" is a more accurate term than "digital gold." He emphasizes that the Bitcoin network is an adaptive ecosystem of miners, nodes, developers, and users. Its core design is intentionally simple, focused on maintaining a secure ledger for scarce digital assets, with complex functionalities built in higher-layer applications. This architecture allows Bitcoin to serve as a foundation for transmitting value and fostering innovation in payments and financial services. Saylor notes Bitcoin's deeper impact lies in creating digital sovereignty, where private keys give individuals permissionless control over their economic power, with ownership verified mathematically, not by institutions. He concludes that while gold's physical scarcity makes it money, Bitcoin's digital scarcity does the same, characterizing Bitcoin as the monetary energy of the digital age.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片