a16z: Three Major AI Trends for 2026

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-12Last updated on 2026-01-12

Abstract

a16z: Three AI Trends for 2026 1. AI Takes on Substantial Research Tasks: AI models are evolving to handle complex, abstract instructions and assist in research, particularly in reasoning. They are beginning to solve difficult problems and foster a new "generalist" research style that focuses on connecting ideas and making inferences from hypothetical answers. This requires new "nested agent" workflows where models collaborate and refine each other's outputs, though better model interoperability and compensation methods (potentially via blockchain) are needed. 2. The Shift from KYC to KYA (Know Your Agent): The bottleneck in the agent economy is shifting from intelligence to identity verification. With non-human identities vastly outnumbering humans in finance, there's a critical need for a "Know Your Agent" infrastructure. Agents require cryptographically signed credentials to transact, linking them to their principals, constraints, and liabilities. 3. Solving the Open Web's "Invisible Tax": AI agents are disrupting the economic foundation of the open web by extracting data from ad-supported sites (the context layer) while bypassing their revenue models. This creates an "invisible tax" that threatens content creation. Solutions are needed to automatically reward content creators, moving from static licensing to real-time compensation systems using technologies like nanopayments and attribution standards, potentially blockchain-enabled.

Author:a16z crypto

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

This Year, AI Will Take on More Substantial Research Tasks

As a mathematical economist, back in January 2025, I struggled to get consumer-grade AI models to understand my workflow; however, by November 2025, I could give abstract instructions to AI models as I would to a PhD student... and sometimes they even returned novel and correct answers. Beyond my personal experience, AI is being more widely applied in research, especially in the field of reasoning. These models not only directly assist the discovery process but can also autonomously solve difficult problems like the Putnam exam (perhaps the world's most challenging university math test).

It's still uncertain in which areas this research assistance will be most helpful and how exactly it will be implemented. But I predict that this year, AI research will promote and reward a new style of "generalist" research: one that focuses more on conceptualizing the relationships between various ideas and can quickly infer from more hypothetical answers.

These answers may not be entirely accurate, but they can still guide research in the right direction (at least within a certain topological structure). Ironically, this is somewhat like harnessing the power of model "hallucination": when models are "smart enough," giving them abstract space to brainstorm may still produce some nonsensical results—but sometimes it leads to breakthrough discoveries, much like how humans can be most creative when not thinking linearly or following explicit directions.

Reasoning in this way requires a new style of AI workflow—not just simple "agent-to-agent" interactions, but a complex collaborative model of "nested agents." In this model, different layers of models assist researchers in evaluating the proposals of earlier models and gradually refining the essence. I already use this method to write papers, while others are using it for patent searches, inventing new forms of artistic works, and even (regrettably) discovering new smart contract attack methods.

However, operating these nested reasoning agent combinations for research still requires better interoperability between models and a way to identify and appropriately compensate each model's contributions—issues that blockchain technology may help solve.

—Scott Kominers(@skominers), a16z crypto research team member, Harvard Business School professor

From "Know Your Customer" (KYC) to "Know Your Agent" (KYA): The Shift in Identity Verification

The bottleneck in the agent economy is shifting from intelligence to identity verification. In financial services, the number of "non-human identities" now exceeds human employees by 96 times—yet these "identities" remain "ghosts" unable to access banking services.

The key missing infrastructure here is "Know Your Agent" (KYA). Just as humans need credit scores to obtain loans, agents need cryptographically signed credentials to conduct transactions—credentials link the agent to its principal, constraints, and liabilities. Until this infrastructure is established, merchants will continue to block these agents at the firewall.

The industry that built KYC infrastructure over the past decades now has only a few months to figure out how to implement KYA.

—Sean Neville(@psneville), Co-founder of Circle, Architect of USDC; CEO of Catena Labs

Solving the "Invisible Tax" on Open Networks: Economic Challenges in the AI Era

The rise of AI agents is imposing an "invisible tax" on open networks, fundamentally disrupting their economic foundation. This disruption stems from the growing mismatch between the internet's "context layer" and "execution layer": currently, AI agents extract data from ad-supported websites (the context layer) to provide convenience to users while systematically bypassing the revenue sources that support the content (such as ads and subscriptions).

To prevent the gradual decline of open networks (and protect the diverse content that fuels AI), we need to deploy technical and economic solutions on a large scale. These solutions may include next-generation sponsored content models, micro-attribution systems, or other new funding models. However, existing AI licensing agreements have proven financially unsustainable, often compensating content providers for only a fraction of the revenue lost due to AI traffic diversion.

The web urgently needs a new techno-economic model that allows value to flow automatically. The key shift in the coming year will be from static licensing models to compensation mechanisms based on real-time usage. This means testing and scaling systems—possibly leveraging blockchain-enabled nanopayments and complex attribution standards—to automatically reward every entity that contributes information to the successful completion of an AI agent's task.

—Liz Harkavy(@liz_harkavy), a16z crypto investment team

Related Questions

QWhat are the three major AI trends predicted by a16z for 2026?

A1. AI will undertake more substantive research tasks, enabling a new 'generalist' research style. 2. A shift from 'Know Your Customer' (KYC) to 'Know Your Agent' (KYA) for identity verification in the agent economy. 3. Addressing the 'invisible tax' on the open web's economy caused by AI agents, requiring new techno-economic models for real-time compensation.

QHow is AI expected to change the research process according to the article?

AAI is expected to push and reward a new 'generalist' research style that focuses on conceptualizing relationships between ideas and quickly inferring from hypothetical answers. It will involve 'nested agent' workflows where different layers of models assist researchers in evaluating early model proposals and refining them, sometimes leading to novel and correct answers or even breakthrough discoveries.

QWhat is the 'invisible tax' that AI agents are imposing on the open web?

AThe 'invisible tax' refers to the economic disruption caused by AI agents systematically extracting data from ad-supported websites (the context layer) to provide user convenience, while bypassing the revenue sources (like ads and subscriptions) that support the content. This undermines the financial foundation of the open web.

QWhat infrastructure is needed for the 'agent economy' as mentioned in the article?

AThe key missing infrastructure is 'Know Your Agent' (KYA), which involves cryptographically signed credentials that link agents to their principals, constraints, and liabilities. This is analogous to credit scores for humans and is necessary for agents to transact and gain access to services, preventing them from being blocked by firewalls.

QWhat solutions are proposed to address the economic challenges AI poses to the open web?

AProposed solutions include deploying next-generation sponsored content models, micro-attribution systems, or other novel funding models. There is a need to shift from static licensing agreements to real-time usage-based compensation mechanisms, potentially using blockchain-enabled nanopayments and sophisticated attribution standards to automatically reward entities that contribute information for AI agent tasks.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit41m ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit41m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit51m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit51m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片