A Post-00's Money-Loss Diary: When Get-Rich-Quick Fantasies Collide with Market Rules

比推Published on 2026-03-13Last updated on 2026-03-13

Abstract

An article titled "A Post-00s Loss Diary: When Get-Rich-Quick Fantasies Collide with Market Rules" details a young woman's experience in the cryptocurrency market from 2024 to 2026. Initially inspired by a friend’s success with Meme coins, she invested her savings across various strategies—Meme coins, BTC dollar-cost averaging, high-leverage contracts, and altcoins—hoping to replicate rapid wealth creation. Her attempts ended in consistent losses: she lost money chasing Meme coins like TRUMP, exited a 15x leveraged contract after a sleepless night of severe drawdown, and held an altcoin (Frag) until it went to zero. By early 2026, her BTC DCA was down 33%, and she realized she had become a classic "counterexample" in crypto investing. Key lessons she learned include: maintaining respect for market forces, establishing clear profit-taking and stop-loss rules, avoiding high leverage due to greed, and prioritizing real-life stability over speculative gains. The piece concludes with her shifting focus from volatile crypto charts to family life, symbolized by helping her mother make dumplings—a metaphor for grounding herself in tangible reality.

Author: Ruibao, Foresight News

Original Title: A Post-00s Girl's Crypto Loss Diary


One summer evening two years ago, a friend parked a brand-new Tesla downstairs and even gave a cheeky honk.

Like me, he hadn't been in the crypto space for long, but he was full of drive, acting like the reincarnation of the 'demon child' with an 'I am the master of my fate' attitude. I hurried downstairs. When he saw me approach, he didn't say much, just casually handed me the keys: "Wanna try?"

I circled the car, itching to drive it, but still played it cool: "Where'd you get the big money? Did you sell yourself?"

He glanced at me, gestured for me to get in, and after a few laps by the river, he started talking: "Finally had a win. Made a bit last month chasing Meme coins, had to reward myself."

Looking at that brand-new Tesla, at that moment, the flame of get-rich-quick dreams inside me was completely ignited.

Back then, the Meme coin frenzy on the Solana chain was at its peak. Scrolling through Twitter every day, you'd see new get-rich-quick scripts: someone puts in a few thousand and comes out with an extra zero (or more) in their account; someone stays up all night watching the charts and earns several years' salary in a week.

As a post-00s, I had just started working and had a few tens of thousands saved in my bank card. Reading these stories, I only had one thought: if others can do it, so can I.

So I took that money and plunged headfirst into this tempting hunting ground. From Meme coins to BTC dollar-cost averaging (DCA), from high-leverage contracts to altcoins, I tried all the mainstream plays in the market.

By the 2026 Spring Festival, I was curled up on the sofa refreshing the price page: BTC price $69,912, my one-year DCA strategy was down 33%.

This year, I failed to replicate any get-rich-quick myth; instead, I became the most real "counter-example" in crypto.

If getting rich requires catching one opportunity, then "not getting rich" is a more profound skill—you need to precisely dodge every single opportunity.

Below is the "dumb money sample" I accumulated this year. For reference only, do not imitate.

Chasing Meme Coins, I Precisely Stepped on Every Dumb Money Trap

When I first entered crypto, I scoffed at phrases like "attention economy." I always thought any asset should have solid value backing it—this was my most basic understanding of "money" as an ordinary person.

But when my friend's car, bought with Meme profits, was parked right in front of me, I wavered.

I began to convince myself: in the face of a trend, personal stubbornness is worthless. Some things, even if you don't understand the logic behind them, can make money for others; and if you don't participate, you're just a spectator. Rather than standing on the sidelines criticizing, it's better to enter the arena and participate.

To replicate my friend's "luck," I stayed up for two whole days researching various "degen" tools: how to set up GMGN alerts... I even made an Excel spreadsheet, recording each new Meme's contract address, Twitter follower count, number of holder addresses...

I thought I was ready.

Then came my "opening disaster"—TRUMP.

It was a classic irrational gamble. I watched the K-line, my heartbeat following the price: entered at a $1.3 billion market cap, got nervous and sold hastily at $1.5 billion; bought back at $1.7 billion, sold again at $1.8 billion, burning through my principal in repeated friction trades; finally went all-in at the peak of $7.8 billion—and never got out.

Looking back, I had only learned how to "buy," but never thought about when to "sell." I was like a cat chasing its own tail, thinking if I ran fast enough, I could catch that tail called "wealth."

Later I realized that participating without a plan was essentially just providing liquidity to the market—to put it nicely, it's an alternative contribution to the industry.

The Most Agonizing Night: 15x Leverage, I Stayed Up Till Dawn

After being schooled by the Meme market, I turned my attention to contracts.

Actually, I'd heard the phrase "contracts are the devil" more than twenty times. The old-timers in the group pleaded earnestly: never touch contracts, it's a "shortcut" to going to zero.

But greed finds its own reasons. My thinking was: volatility brings returns, and returns require risk. Those who get liquidated just don't know how to manage their positions. I'm surely more rational than them.

So I specifically chose altcoin contracts, with leverage set to 15x to 20x. The mindset was微妙 (subtle): setting it too low felt like earning too slowly, setting it too high risked liquidation. I finally picked a middle number, comforting myself that this was "balancing risk."

It wasn't until that all-nighter that I was彻底清醒 (thoroughly awakened).

Around 10 PM, I casually opened a long position on an altcoin, 15x leverage. For the first half hour, the price rose slightly. Lying in bed, I happily calculated: just another 5% up and I can get a new phone.

The next second, the price began to cliff-dive.

The red loss numbers kept flashing, the liquidation price inching closer. I stared at the ceiling, unable to sleep. The phone screen lit up and dimmed, dimmed and lit up. I refreshed the行情 (market行情 quotes) every 30 seconds. But the K-line never changes based on my will; it just coldly, centimeter by centimeter, approached my liquidation line.

3 AM, I was still refreshing.

5 AM, dawn approaching, staring at the remaining 30% margin, I finally understood one thing: rather than watching my principal shrink, it's better to cut losses and exit. At least I could save some and get some sleep.

The moment I clicked "Close Position," nearly half the money was gone from the account. But strangely, I felt inexplicably relieved. That night, I finally slept soundly.

After that, I started self-studying technical analysis. Looking at K-line patterns, studying MACD, RSI indicators,刷教程 (scouring tutorials), asking friends, trying to find patterns in the market. Progress was indeed made: even when prices fluctuated wildly, I no longer let minor swings dictate my emotions like before.

More importantly, I learned to reduce leverage. Using 3x to 5x leverage to gain breathing room, weathering the market maker's wash trades. Only then did I truly understand: contracts were never the devil; the devil is the compression of承受空间 (bearable fluctuation space) caused by high leverage.

The tool itself is neither good nor bad. Without restraint, blindly chasing high returns, even the best tool becomes a knife that cuts your own flesh.

Turns Out, Altcoins Can Really Go to Zero

If Meme coins made me lose money, and contracts made me lose sleep; then altcoins made me see the cruelest side of crypto.

A few days ago, I saw a 2025 data report: over 85% of tokens issued that year ended with negative returns, a significant portion of which had gone completely to zero. That number instantly brought me back to over half a year ago.

Back then, I held a coin called Frag—not a major project, just something I bought casually. At first, I watched it bleed out slowly, down 20%, 30%, 50% from my buy-in price. Logically, I should have cut losses, but there was always a voice in my head: "Wait a bit longer, what if it bounces back?"

By the time it was down 60%, I couldn't be bothered to look. I thought: just treat it like a lottery ticket, let it sit, it's only 100U left anyway, going to zero is fine. Even on the day it crashed 42% in a single day, I joked with a friend: "It's fine, if it goes to zero, consider it buying me bubble tea."

I truly believed then that "altcoins going to zero" was just a crypto meme—surely even the worst would have some residual value, right? It can't just vanish completely, can it?

Until one day I opened my wallet and found that coin had彻底归零 (completely gone to zero).

The team rug-pulled, liquidity was pulled. I stared at the wallet page for half a minute, refreshing repeatedly, but all that remained was "zero."

Although it was a small amount of money, it taught me one thing: maintain a bone-deep敬畏 (awe/reverence) for the market.

When market sentiment fades, when the market makers leave, those altcoins with no real value, relying solely on hype, their final destination is the bottom. The "bottom line" you imagine might just be a thin layer of ice on the edge of a cliff.

One Year in Crypto, Didn't Get Rich, But Gained a Few Stepping Stones

In the summer of 2024, my friend's new car ignited my fantasies about crypto. I entered with expectations, always feeling I could be that lucky one.

During the 2026 Spring Festival, curled up on the sofa looking at the screen full of red loss numbers, I finally accepted my ordinariness: getting rich quick isn't that easy.

But this year wasn't all losses. If I had to say what I accumulated, it's probably these few "stepping stones":

First, always respect the market; don't challenge it with your own认知 (perception/cognition).

Blinded by envy of my friend's car, I rashly jumped into Meme coins;迷信 (superstitiously believing) in "DCA and win lying down," I rigidly applied strategies, and was ultimately狠狠教育 (severely taught a lesson) by the market. The market doesn't care about your reasons; it only gives you the numbers.

Second, for any investment, think clearly about "when to sell."

Buying is just the beginning of investing; selling is what determines profit or loss. All the losses this year were essentially because I didn't establish my own rules for taking profits and cutting losses. Buying based on FOMO, selling based on emotion, operating on feeling, ultimately leads to more losses than gains.

Third, tools are neither good nor bad; greed lies in the human heart; learning克制 (restraint) is what makes a winner.

Contracts aren't the devil; the greed for high leverage is; DCA isn't a guaranteed win strategy; the stubbornness of sticking rigidly to it is. Tools are just tools; the person using them determines the outcome.

Fourth, cherish cash flow, cherish your chips.

Get-rich-quick stories in crypto are always the minority. No matter how the numbers jump on the exchange, we ultimately return to real life—that bowl of rice, that bottle of water, that pack of tissues, that's real life.

Yesterday afternoon, I was curled up on the sofa, phone screen still lit with the market page.

My mom popped her head out from the kitchen: "Dumplings for dinner, leek and egg filling."

I was stunned for a second, almost条件反射 (reflexively) replying "leek" is a sensitive word for me now. (Note: "韭菜" leek is slang for dumb money/retail investors in Chinese)

But I didn't say it. I just turned off the trading app and got up to go into the kitchen.

The numbers on the exchange are still jumping. But at this moment, I just want to help my mom make dumplings.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original Link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7619497

Related Questions

QWhat was the main reason the author initially entered the cryptocurrency market?

AThe author was motivated by the sight of a friend's new Tesla, which was purchased with profits from trading Meme coins, sparking a desire for quick wealth.

QWhat were the four key lessons the author learned from their year in the crypto market?

A1. Always respect the market and never challenge it with one's own limited knowledge. 2. Any investment must include a clear plan for when to sell. 3. Tools are neutral; greed is the problem, and learning restraint is key to winning. 4. Cherish cash flow and real-life resources, not just digital numbers.

QWhich trading instrument caused the author to stay up all night in anxiety, and what was the outcome?

AA 15x leveraged altcoin futures contract caused the author to stay up all night watching the price plummet. They eventually cut their losses by closing the position, losing nearly half their margin but gaining peace of mind.

QWhat specific event made the author realize that altcoins can truly go to zero?

AThe author held a token called Frag that experienced a continuous decline until it eventually reached a value of zero in their wallet after the project team abandoned it and liquidity was withdrawn.

QHow did the author's perspective change by the end of their experience, as symbolized in the final scene?

AThe author shifted their focus on fluctuating digital numbers in the exchange to valuing real-life moments, symbolized by turning off the trading app to help their mother make dumplings.

Related Reads

Promised Year of Crypto IPOs? Only One Went Public in Six Months, Down 70%

The much-anticipated wave of crypto IPOs in 2026 has failed to materialize, with market conditions worsening dramatically. While SpaceX prepares for the largest IPO in history, raising $75 billion at a $1.75 trillion valuation, the crypto sector faces a frozen pipeline. The sole crypto IPO success this year, BitGo, serves as a cautionary tale. After launching on the NYSE in January at $18, its stock has plummeted approximately 70%. Other major contenders have stalled or delayed. Kraken, which secretly filed in late 2025, has put its plans on ice, seeing its valuation drop 33% to $13.3 billion. Consensys has postponed its filing until autumn at the earliest, and Bitpanda is poised to miss its self-imposed H1 deadline for a Frankfurt listing. This widespread retreat is driven by a severe liquidity crunch. Bitcoin has fallen below $60,000, with capital being diverted to AI stocks and the massive SpaceX offering. The poor performance of earlier crypto listings like Gemini and the stagnant price of Coinbase further dampen investor appetite. A key underlying pressure is the impending US midterm elections in November, which could alter the currently favorable regulatory landscape. Companies had hoped to go public during this window of policy certainty, but challenging market dynamics have overridden those plans. The transparency that comes with being a public company is now seen as a potential liability rather than a benefit in a down market. The industry's fate now hinges on a few critical watchpoints: whether Kraken restarts its process in H2, if Consensys files in the fall, and if SpaceX's debut can revitalize market liquidity. Otherwise, the promised "crypto IPO year" will likely be pushed beyond the election.

marsbit11m ago

Promised Year of Crypto IPOs? Only One Went Public in Six Months, Down 70%

marsbit11m ago

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

Behind the "AI factories" of Elon Musk and Jensen Huang lies a hidden battle for a critical resource: fresh water. As AI models like ChatGPT and Claude process billions of prompts daily, they consume vast amounts of water for cooling. By 2030, global AI infrastructure is projected to use 9.3 trillion liters annually—enough to meet the basic needs of 1.3 billion people. This "water grab" stems from the massive heat generated by high-powered GPUs. Over 70% of data centers use evaporative cooling systems, where water absorbs heat and evaporates into the atmosphere, depleting local groundwater. Training models like GPT-4 can consume over 600 million liters of water. Tech giants like Google and Microsoft report skyrocketing water usage, sparking conflicts with local communities over resources. A flashpoint occurred in Memphis, Tennessee, where Musk's xAI built the Colossus supercomputer. It draws nearly 3.8 million liters of drinking water daily from local aquifers, leading to public outrage and legal action. In response, xAI is building an $80 million water recycling plant to use treated wastewater instead. Facing pressure, companies like Microsoft promote "waterless" closed-loop cooling systems. However, these systems increase electricity consumption by 20-30%, shifting the water burden to power plants, which require immense cooling water themselves—a case of indirect water footprint transfer. For China's AI industry, this crisis offers a strategic warning and opportunity. Instead of replicating the West's resource-intensive model, China can leverage its "East Data, West Computing" policy to locate data centers in cooler, water-rich regions like Guizhou. Furthermore, developing lightweight edge computing for smart homes and embodied AI robots can drastically reduce the need for constant cloud queries, cutting both water and energy consumption at the source. The freshwater war underscores a fundamental question: Will AI be a tool for human advancement or a silicon-based monster competing for our planet's last drops of clean water? The answer is becoming clearer as the water vapor rises.

marsbit57m ago

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

marsbit57m ago

AGI is Just One Step Away

The article discusses Anthropic's release of the Fable 5 model, a heavily restricted version of its powerful Mythos model. Initially unveiled in April, Mythos reportedly identified over 10,000 high-risk vulnerabilities for 50 enterprise clients, causing significant concern. Due to its dangerous capabilities in areas like autonomous cyber-attacks and biochemical weapons design guidance (classified as CB-1 level), the unaltered Mythos 5 remains limited to about 200 vetted entities like government agencies. Fable 5, released with a safety classifier, demonstrates extraordinary performance, leading benchmarks in coding (SWE-Bench Pro), software engineering, and research. It exhibits true "long-horizon agency," autonomously planning and executing complex, multi-step tasks like migrating 50 million lines of code in a day, moving beyond simple question-answering. The article positions Fable 5 at OpenAI's Level 3 ("Agent") and progressing toward Level 4 ("Innovator"), suggesting AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is within reach, potentially 18-24 months away. To mitigate risks, Anthropic implemented a two-layer safety "cage": a silent routing system that redirects dangerous queries to a weaker model, and a mandatory 30-day data retention policy for all Mythos traffic to detect patterns of malicious use. Despite its high cost ($10/$50 per million input/output tokens), the model targets the enterprise market, where its unparalleled productivity and defensive capabilities against AI-powered cyber threats justify the premium. This signals a market maturation where top-tier AI becomes a strategic, high-value tool for businesses, potentially widening the gap with consumer-focused models and accelerating the rise of "one-person companies" while disrupting labor markets.

marsbit1h ago

AGI is Just One Step Away

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片