Bitcoin Added $14,264 in a Week; According to Galaxy, a Signal the Next Bottom is Near

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-28Last updated on 2026-08-28

Abstract

Bitcoin concluded the week ending August 23rd with a gain of $14,264, or 22.7%, closing at $77,387. This marked its largest weekly dollar gain on record, though percentage gains have been larger when prices were lower. The subsequent rally pushed prices to a three-month high above $81,000 before a slight pullback. The catalyst for the surge was identified as the U.S. Treasury's announcement to at least double its long-term bond buyback operations to support liquidity. Galaxy Digital's Head of Research, Alex Thorn, also noted a significant "buying shift" in BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) by retail investors, a signal not seen in two years. Galaxy Research highlighted a key technical level to watch: the 50-week moving average around $82,470. Historical data shows that in 11 of the past 13 bear markets since 2011, a weekly close above this average has coincided with the cycle bottom being in. Failure to achieve this close could mean the rally is merely a corrective bounce within a longer downtrend rather than the start of a new bullish trend. Matt Cole, CEO of Strive, offered an optimistic view, suggesting the next Bitcoin cycle could be the strongest ever, citing its performance relative to the dollar and gold as evidence of changing dynamics. However, as the price base grows, record dollar gains become easier to achieve, making sustainability the key question.

Bitcoin ended the trading week (ending August 23) with a gain of $14,264, or 22.7%, reaching $77,387, marking its best weekly performance in dollar terms since the asset began trading, although previously, when the price was lower, Bitcoin had shown more significant fluctuations in percentage terms.

A 22.7% gain sounds impressive, and it is, but Bitcoin has shown larger percentage gains before when the entire market was worth only a fraction of today's value. What distinguished last week was the price level from which Bitcoin's move began.

At current levels, even small percentage fluctuations result in five-figure changes in dollars, which was impossible when Bitcoin traded in the hundreds or low thousands.

The momentum did not stop after the candle closed: in the following days, the price of Bitcoin rose to $81,000, reaching a three-month high before retreating back to the $79,000 area.

Traders pointed to a specific catalyst for this move: The US Treasury Department stated it would at least double the size of its long-dated bond buyback operations to support liquidity – from $2 billion to at least $4 billion per operation, with larger operations scheduled from September 9 to November 4.

Alex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Digital, pointed to another sign behind this rally: Blackrock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) showed the most significant "buying tilt" from retail investors in two years – a sign that not only institutional investors but also ordinary investors were actively entering the market again during the rise to $81,257.

Where Wall Street Sees the Next Signal

Galaxy Research also tracks Bitcoin's 50-week moving average, currently around $82,470, to assess further prospects. In a separate analysis report covered by Bitcoin.com News, the company found that in 11 out of 13 completed bear markets since 2011, a weekly close above this average coincided with the cycle bottom already being reached. Only two recoveries did not hold, both occurring during the 2021–2022 "double top" cycle.

This gives Bitcoin's price movement a specific target. A close above the roughly $82,500 level would move Bitcoin into an area that Galaxy's own model considers historically reliable for confirming a bottom, not just a bounce. If this level is not reached, the record-breaking week risks being remembered as a sharp recovery jump within a longer decline, rather than the start of a new uptrend.

Strive Chairman and CEO Matt Cole offered one of the more optimistic interpretations of this move, telling media that "the next Bitcoin cycle will be the strongest we've ever seen," pointing to Bitcoin's momentum against the dollar and gold as evidence that this asset is behaving differently than in past cycles.

However, records expressed in dollars become easier to break as the price base grows, so the headline figure alone does not determine whether the rally has real staying power.

Related Questions

QWhat was Bitcoin's weekly gain in dollars and percentage for the week ending August 23, according to the article?

ABitcoin gained $14,264, or 22.7%, ending the week at $77,387.

QAccording to Galaxy Research, what specific price level should Bitcoin close above to signal a confirmed cycle bottom?

ABitcoin needs to achieve a weekly close above the 50-week moving average, which is around $82,500, to signal a confirmed cycle bottom according to Galaxy's historical model.

QWhat specific catalyst did traders point to for the recent Bitcoin price movement mentioned in the article?

ATraders pointed to the US Treasury's announcement to at least double the size of its long-dated bond buyback operations (from $2 billion to at least $4 billion per operation) to support liquidity, starting from September 9 to November 4.

QWhat indicator regarding the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) did Alex Thorn of Galaxy Digital highlight as significant?

AAlex Thorn highlighted that the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) showed its biggest 'buy skew' from retail investors in two years, indicating renewed active participation from retail alongside institutional investors during the rally.

QWhat is one of the more optimistic interpretations of the current market cycle mentioned in the article, and who provided it?

AMatt Cole, Chairman and CEO of Strive, provided an optimistic interpretation, stating that 'the next Bitcoin cycle will be the strongest we've ever seen,' citing Bitcoin's price action relative to the dollar and gold as evidence it's behaving differently.

Related Reads

Wash's Jackson Hole Debut: Bidding Farewell to 'Forward Guidance', Reshaping Fed Discipline Amidst the Squeeze Between AI and Inflation

In his first Jackson Hole speech, new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh signaled a significant shift in monetary policy communication. He declared that "forward guidance," a tool heavily used since the financial crisis, has outlived its usefulness in normal times and should be retired. He cautioned that over-reliance on it can distort market signals and constrain the Fed's flexibility. Instead, Warsh emphasized a return to data-dependence and decision-making discipline. Warsh outlined seven key principles to guide policy: anchoring the 2% inflation target, pursuing the employment mandate, using short-term rates as the primary tool, acknowledging the importance of money, and maintaining purposeful, restrained communication. He stressed that policy should focus on trends, not single data points. On the current economic outlook, Warsh noted that the labor market is consistent with full employment but inflation remains "far above" the Fed's target. He highlighted that over half of the PCE basket's components are still rising above 3% annually. While acknowledging AI's transformative potential for productivity and capital allocation, he admitted its full economic impact remains uncertain and is not a factor in current policy decisions. His core message was a commitment to policy discipline rather than pre-set decisions. Warsh stated the Fed's primary focus must be on restoring price stability, vowing, "We still have work to do," until there is clear evidence inflation is moving decisively toward 2%. He concluded by framing effective monetary policy as crucial for economic prosperity and U.S. global leadership.

Odaily星球日报11m ago

Wash's Jackson Hole Debut: Bidding Farewell to 'Forward Guidance', Reshaping Fed Discipline Amidst the Squeeze Between AI and Inflation

Odaily星球日报11m ago

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

Blockstream, a major Bitcoin solutions developer, has introduced a draft proposal for a new quantum-resistant digital signature scheme called SHRINCS. The scheme aims to protect Bitcoin transactions from potential attacks by quantum computers while aiming to maintain network throughput. This marks the second technical proposal for Bitcoin quantum defense in recent days, following a similar initiative from StarkWare. A quantum attack on blockchain typically involves deriving a private key from a public one. Currently considered computationally infeasible, quantum algorithms could potentially solve this problem far more efficiently. This threat presents two primary scenarios: an attacker could target addresses where the public key is already exposed, or intercept a transaction before it is confirmed, extract the public key, derive the private key, and replace the transaction. Blockstream's SHRINCS is designed to counter the latter, "in-flight" attack scenario. The SHRINCS signature is built upon the SHA-256 hash function, the same one already used in Bitcoin mining, allowing developers to leverage well-tested, familiar mechanisms. A key design goal was to preserve network capacity. Blockstream estimates Bitcoin could process about three transactions per second using SHRINCS, compared to the current rate of roughly seven, noting that some alternative quantum-resistant schemes could reduce throughput to as low as 0.36 transactions per second. Currently, the security proof for SHRINCS is pending, and the software has not been audited or deemed ready for production. However, Blockstream conducted tests with such transactions on its Liquid sidechain in March. Over the past year, Bitcoin developers have been actively exploring paths to migrate to post-quantum cryptography, a priority across the broader crypto market, underscored by significant investments into securing the leading cryptocurrency.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

When autonomous AI agents behave unpredictably and cause harm, determining legal liability is complex. Currently, there is no specific federal AI agent liability law, so existing legal frameworks are applied. The AI agent itself cannot be held liable, as it is not a legal entity. Liability typically falls on the "developer" (the maker of the AI) or the "deployer" (the user), depending on the facts and circumstances. A negligence analysis under standard tort law may apply. For instance, if a deployer gives a reckless instruction, such as demanding quick money without safety parameters, they could face significant liability, including potential criminal charges under statutes like the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. The situation is complicated by open-source models, where licenses often disclaim liability, and by the unclear division of responsibility between developers and deployers. An analogy is drawn to self-driving car accidents, where both the manufacturer and the human operator can share fault. In cases of severe harm, such as using AI to create bioweapons, liability for developers depends on jurisdiction; the EU's AI Act imposes responsibilities, while U.S. law offers less clear grounds, similar to platforms being shielded for user-generated content under Section 230. Even if Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is achieved, the expert argues against making AGI itself a legally liable entity, as it lacks personhood, assets, or a meaningful way to provide remedy for harm. Instead, accountability should rest with the responsible human or corporate entities behind the technology.

cointelegraph1h ago

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

cointelegraph1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片