When Crypto Faith Becomes the 'Plato's Cave' in Modern Investing

比推Published on 2025-12-12Last updated on 2025-12-12

Abstract

In "When Crypto Belief Becomes a Modern 'Plato's Cave'," the author reflects on how initial optimism in cryptocurrency has evolved into a "sunk cost trap," where past investments—whether financial, temporal, or emotional—keep individuals tethered to an ecosystem that may no longer serve their best interests. Drawing parallels to Plato’s allegory of the cave, the piece argues that many in crypto remain chained not by ignorance but by their accumulated stakes, mistaking shadows (past efforts) for reality. The author shares a personal journey from professional poker to crypto, illustrating how sunk costs—like a decade in poker—can create a "luxurious trap" that’s hard to escape. Despite crypto’s maturation (e.g., Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, Robinhood adopting blockchain tech), the landscape has shifted: traditional finance co-opts crypto innovations, and gains increasingly flow to insiders or equities rather than retail token holders. The article categorizes crypto adherents into four camps (pro-Bitcoin, pro-crypto, both, or neither) and further divides them based on belief in future upside. It suggests that only those fully convinced of crypto’s potential should devote all their time to it; others should diversify skills and consider exit strategies. The core message: don’t let sunk costs imprison you in a fading dream. Freedom lies in acknowledging when to step away and explore broader opportunities beyond the crypto.

Author: Evanss6

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

Original Title: When Faith Becomes a Cage: The Sunk Cost Trap in the Crypto Era


At any point in the past, this might have been good advice when talking about cryptocurrency: hoard Bitcoin, or maybe mainstream coins, do some staking, try new products with rewards, and don't get liquidated playing with contracts—chances are you would have made money. Behind this are two core beliefs: Bitcoin will become a more mainstream non-sovereign store of value, and smart contracts will become the infrastructure of finance.

I won't go into detail about how these judgments have been validated, because we need to talk about this "cage." Just two facts:

Bitcoin ETFs have seen $49 billion in inflows, Ethereum ETFs have seen $4.3 billion, and more altcoin ETFs are just getting started. Michael Saylor himself has purchased over $40 billion, and many companies are gradually buying in.

Robinhood just announced it will use Arbitrum's tech stack to build an EVM chain as the backend financial infrastructure for its platform, and will also list the most popular product in cryptocurrency: perpetual contracts.

Cryptocurrency is increasingly resembling traditional finance. It's being bought by the previous generation in brokerage accounts, promoted by Larry Fink, and used by companies like Robinhood with technology. What many of us imagined a decade ago is coming true.

So what exactly is the "sunk cost cage"?

Simply put, it's persisting with something because of past investments. This can appear in many places: your skills, investments you still hold, your relationships, a job you're afraid to quit, or spending all your time on cryptocurrency.

  • "I don't want to leave her because our past is too deep."

  • "I don't want to change careers because I've spent too much time on this."

  • "I don't want to sell my Ethereum because I bought it early, and it's been good to me."

These are all sunk cost fallacies. Not realizing you're thinking this way is a form of self-sabotage, keeping you doing things you know deep down are no longer beneficial.

The sunk cost cage is the modern version of Plato's Allegory of the Cave.

The prisoners only know the shadows on the wall, unaware of where the shadows come from or that there's a larger world outside.

In Plato's allegory, the prisoners stayed in the cave because they mistook the shadows for reality, unaware of a "more real" world outside. In the modern version, we stay not out of ignorance, but because we've invested too much in the shadows. That job that no longer fits, the career you no longer believe in, the identity built on long hours and silent endurance—these are the costs paid. The more time, education, and reputation invested, the harder it is to leave. The illusion is no longer just external; it's internalized as duty, logic, and the "reasonable thing to do."

But freedom isn't cheap. Escaping the sunk cost cage means admitting that what you've built might no longer serve you. Past efforts cannot be the reason to continue staying. Like the prisoner turning towards the light, this requires not only courage but also betraying the part of yourself that is overly loyal to your own investments. The hardest part isn't seeing the truth, but saying goodbye to the self that stayed too long, believed too deeply, and paid the price for the cage.

My Experience

I stayed in a cage for a long time myself.

I fell in love with poker in my teens. In the back row of high school classes, I was always calculating bankroll expectations in a notebook, not listening to lectures or taking notes. Within two years, I went from $0.01/$0.02 micro-stakes to high-stakes tables. Over time, I liked playing less and less, seeing it only as a way to make money, always thinking "I'll quit in another two or three years."

But a decade passed, and nothing changed. I was still playing, still winning, but always felt the money wasn't enough to "do something else." Worse, I didn't even know what else I could do, and I saw clearly: poker was a declining game, and I had to work harder and harder just to keep up. But I told myself I should continue because I had spent so much time getting good, it offered better returns than other options, I had no other viable path, and no time to think—staying a consistent winner in high-stakes online games was exhausting enough: studying strategy, finding good games, avoiding cheats and shady sites...

To be honest, this "can't easily switch careers because it makes money" is a luxurious problem. But as it became harder to find a better industry, I knew the days were numbered.

First Encounter with Cryptocurrency

I encountered cryptocurrency early through my previous career. In 2012, I first read about Bitcoin on a poker forum called TwoPlusTwo. By then, the Bitcoin subforum had been open for over a year.

The first reply was hilarious: "This thing is worth 70 cents now? A currency no one uses can reach this price, lol." The second reply said you could actually exchange it for dollars or buy pizza—these were the early uses of what later became a $2 trillion asset. Scrolling down a few more posts:

"Really missed an era." Anyway, I noticed it because some poker sites started using it. At the time, I thought its $2 billion market cap was outrageous. If it was only for black/gray markets, maybe it was worth that; if it could go mainstream, its value would multiply endlessly.

By 2016-17, as my investments became substantial, I spent more and more time on cryptocurrency (especially ICOs). This diversion of time was my first step out of the cage. But it wasn't until the rise of DeFi in 2020, when you could actually make money, that I fully jumped in.

Back then, I knew nothing about trading and had to learn by doing. I studied economics and math in college, but my real skill was poker. Fortunately, poker is excellent training for trading: it gives you ruthless real-time feedback on decisions, forces you to manage risk, price correctly, develop overall strategy, and builds emotional resilience and soft skills to withstand bad runs—all necessary for independent trading.

In the end, I'm grateful and lucky to have spent a lot of time from 2013-2019 exploring these curiosities, which put me in the best position when the opportunity arose. If I had focused more on poker those years, I might have played better, but following my intuition to formulate a transition/exit plan was truly fortunate.

How does this "cage" apply today?

In recent years, financial nihilism has become increasingly apparent in the crypto circle. More and more people no longer believe in the beautiful ideals they held when they first entered. The goal has become "making money," going all in, working desperately, and "exiting" when you've made enough.

Roughly, there are four camps:

  • Green Camp (Believe in Bitcoin, don't believe in other cryptocurrencies)

  • Red Camp (Believe in cryptocurrency, don't believe in Bitcoin)

  • Brown Camp (Believe in both)

  • White Camp (Believe in neither)

Add two scenarios to each camp, and it becomes eight types:

  • (a) Believe there is still upside potential, worth the risk

  • (b) Believe the upside has already been taken by early buyers

I believe only those in 2(a) should devote all their time to cryptocurrency. If you are in 1(b), 2(b), 3(b), or 4(b), you'd better start diversifying your time and making an exit plan. If you are in 1(a) or 4(a), just hold Bitcoin and don't pay too much attention to anything else. 3(a) can hold some Bitcoin and other assets, splitting time and energy between crypto and non-crypto. If you've seen my account and posts, you can probably tell that I, who was mostly in 2(a) from 2015-2023, am now somewhat wavering between 1(a), 3(a), and 3(b).

Let's talk about the Red Camp. It's been quite painful staying here the past few years.

We've basically been in a situation of continuously rising Bitcoin dominance, even though the overall cryptocurrency system is more widespread. Even if you accurately predicted that the Ethereum ETF would see over $4 billion in net inflows, predicted that giants like Robinhood would use its technology, predicted that Trump would win, reform the SEC, end OCP2.0, and create a pro-crypto environment. From the day the ETF launched, your Ethereum investment is still down. And today Ethereum is around $2600, investors from 2015 are up 2000 to 8600 times.

So the answer

I doubt whether "perseverance," as Mippo said in the tweet at the beginning of this article, is really the right path, the biggest opportunity. Everything you dreamed of has either already happened or is on its way. In 2017, if Robinhood announced developing on Ethereum, the price would have jumped 10% immediately, but now it's different. The move now is to buy HOOD stock. I believe there are still opportunities in cryptocurrency, but the trend of opportunities being taken by non-crypto assets (stocks) or insiders (teams/private investors, look at Celestia Finance) is not friendly to dreamers. If you really want to "persevere," you have to invest in these projects early or build them yourself. So Mippo isn't wrong, solving real problems in crypto is still an opportunity. But don't think that just because crypto technology is becoming widespread, current coin prices will necessarily rise (especially compared to other assets you could invest in).

Unless you are a true Red Camp diehard 2(a), "perseverance" is choosing to stay in the cave watching shadows on the wall, while people outside are already working on AI and robotics.

You'd better honestly ask yourself: Which camp are you in? Do you even like cryptocurrency? Regardless, try to cultivate some skills that are also useful elsewhere, so if it doesn't work out, you have a fallback. At the very least, you won't be unhappy from spending all your time on something you're already tired of. And if you're wrong, you have a soft landing place.

The door of the sunk cost cage isn't locked; what traps you is your own thoughts. All you need to do is open the door from time to time and walk out. Life is beautiful, the world is full of possibilities.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7595320

Related Questions

QWhat is the 'sunk cost cage' as described in the article?

AThe 'sunk cost cage' is the modern equivalent of Plato's allegory of the cave. It refers to the psychological trap where individuals persist in a course of action (e.g., a job, investment, or relationship) because of the significant resources (time, money, effort, identity) they have already invested, even when they know it is no longer beneficial. The 'prisoners' are trapped not by ignorance of a better reality but by their own past investments, which they feel obligated to justify.

QHow does the author relate their personal experience with poker to the sunk cost fallacy?

AThe author played professional poker for over a decade. Despite growing to dislike the game and recognizing it was a declining industry, they continued because of the significant time and effort invested to become skilled. They felt trapped by the belief that they had no other viable career path and that the money earned made it difficult to transition, even though they knew it was no longer the right path. This is a direct example of the sunk cost fallacy.

QAccording to the author, what are the four main camps in the crypto space, and what are the two sub-conditions for each?

AThe four main camps are: 1. Green Camp (believe in Bitcoin, not in crypto), 2. Red Camp (believe in crypto, not in Bitcoin), 3. Brown Camp (believe in both), and 4. White Camp (believe in neither). Each camp is further divided into two sub-conditions: (a) those who believe there is still significant upside potential and it's worth the risk, and (b) those who believe the upside has already been captured by early investors.

QWhat does the author suggest is the risk for those who choose to 'persevere' (HODL) in crypto without being a true believer?

AThe author suggests that for anyone not in the true believer category (specifically Red Camp 2(a)), choosing to 'persevere' or HODL is like choosing to remain in Plato's cave watching shadows on the wall. Meanwhile, the larger world is moving on to other major technological advancements like AI and robotics. The opportunity cost of staying in a cage built on past beliefs, rather than exploring new possibilities, is the primary risk.

QWhat early signs of crypto's mainstream adoption does the author point to as validation of its original promise?

AThe author points to several signs of mainstream adoption: Bitcoin ETFs have attracted $49 billion in inflows, Ethereum ETFs have attracted $4.3 billion, and more altcoin ETFs are starting. Companies like MicroStrategy, led by Michael Saylor, have purchased over $40 billion in Bitcoin. Furthermore, traditional finance platforms like Robinhood are building their backend financial infrastructure on crypto technology (EVM chains like Arbitrum) and offering popular crypto products like perpetual contracts.

Related Reads

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片