South Dakota revives Bitcoin reserve plan with 10% allocation cap – Details

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-28Last updated on 2026-01-28

Abstract

South Dakota Representative Logan Manhart has revived a legislative effort, House Bill 1155, to allow the state to allocate up to 10% of its revenues into Bitcoin. The bill includes strict security measures for storing private keys and represents a cautious, incremental approach to treating Bitcoin as a legitimate public asset. This move aligns with a growing trend among states like Texas, Arizona, and New Hampshire, which are pursuing their own digital asset strategies amid delays in federal action. The proposal underscores a shift toward state-level adoption as a long-term inflation hedge, reflecting the broader bullish market sentiment around Bitcoin.

While Washington dangles the promise of a federal strategic reserve, South Dakota is tired of waiting.

Representative Logan Manhart (R) has officially revived a legislative push that could fundamentally alter the state’s balance sheet.

On the 27th of January, Manhart introduced House Bill 1155, an ambitious measure that would empower the State Investment Council to allocate up to 10% of state revenues directly into Bitcoin.

South Dakota’s second Bitcoin Reserve attempt

The move is more than just a second attempt at a stalled 2025 proposal.

If passed, HB 1155 would not just allow South Dakota to hold Bitcoin [BTC] but also require strict security rules, with private keys stored across multiple, geographically separate data centers under direct government control.

By limiting the allocation to 10%, the state is taking a cautious, step-by-step approach.

The goal is to gradually treat Bitcoin as a legitimate public asset, similar to what Texas and Arizona are already doing. Thus, reintroducing HB 1155 shows that South Dakota’s view of digital assets is evolving.

Other states and their Bitcoin Reserve plans

South Dakota isn’t the only state that’s tired of waiting around for Washington, as several other states are also moving in the same direction.

New Hampshire already allows up to 5% of certain state funds to be invested in digital assets, while Texas and Arizona have passed laws to include Bitcoin in state reserves.

Florida is also considering a similar bill aimed at using digital assets as an inflation hedge.

However, at the federal level, creating a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is still a key goal for the current administration.

Patrick Witt, Director of the White House Crypto Council, has already acknowledged that legal complications have slowed progress.

As a result, the federal plan currently depends mainly on Bitcoin seized by the Department of Justice, rather than new purchases.

What’s more?

This came at a time when BTC was trading around $89,199 at press time as per CoinMarketCap, with the Bitcoin crypto sentiment standing bullish at 81%.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin Dominance also stood at 59.55% as per TradingView, reflecting continued investor preference for the asset.

All this put together showed that the market entered 2026 with a focus on fundamentals. And with this bill, South Dakota is choosing to act rather than wait.


Final Thoughts

  • Rather than chasing price, South Dakota is legislating infrastructure for long-term exposure.
  • HB 1155 reflects a broader trend of states testing Bitcoin before federal execution materializes.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of House Bill 1155 introduced in South Dakota?

AHouse Bill 1155 is an ambitious measure that would empower the State Investment Council to allocate up to 10% of state revenues directly into Bitcoin, treating it as a legitimate public asset.

QHow does South Dakota's proposed Bitcoin allocation compare to the approach of other states like New Hampshire?

ASouth Dakota's bill allows for an allocation of up to 10% of state revenues, which is a higher cap than New Hampshire, which allows up to 5% of certain state funds to be invested in digital assets.

QWhat security measures are mandated for Bitcoin holdings under the proposed South Dakota bill?

AThe bill requires strict security rules, with private keys stored across multiple, geographically separate data centers under direct government control.

QWhat is the current status of the federal government's plan for a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve according to the article?

AThe federal plan for a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve has been slowed by legal complications and currently depends mainly on Bitcoin seized by the Department of Justice, rather than new purchases.

QWhat broader trend does the reintroduction of HB 1155 represent among U.S. states?

AHB 1155 reflects a broader trend of states like Texas, Arizona, and Florida testing Bitcoin integration and creating infrastructure for long-term exposure before a federal execution materializes.

Related Reads

1inch Team Accused of Dumping, On-Chain Data Reveals Sophisticated Trading Strategies of Large Positions

Recent on-chain data from ARKHAM indicated that three wallets labeled as "1inch Team" sold 36.36 million 1INCH tokens, worth $5.04 million, causing the token's price to drop by 16.7% to around $0.1155. The tokens were initially acquired in late 2024 at approximately $0.42 each, meaning the sale resulted in a loss of over $10 million for the seller. This event sparked criticism and raised questions about whether the 1inch team was intentionally dumping tokens. However, the team’s historical trading behavior shows a pattern of strategic accumulation during market lows and gradual profit-taking during highs—not large-scale selling at a loss. For instance, earlier in the year, the team accumulated 1INCH at around $0.20 and sold portions at higher prices, realizing significant profits on 1INCH, ETH, and BTC positions. 1inch officially denied involvement, clarifying that the wallets in question were not controlled by the team or its multisig treasury and that the sell-off was likely executed by a third-party holder. The team emphasized that it does not influence independent token holders' decisions. Despite the clarification, the sell-off exacerbated the token’s already weak market performance. 1INCH has been in a prolonged downtrend since its all-time high of $6, now trading near $0.11. The incident highlights how on-chain labels can be misleading and how low liquidity magnifies the impact of large sales—often harming retail investors the most.

marsbit21m ago

1inch Team Accused of Dumping, On-Chain Data Reveals Sophisticated Trading Strategies of Large Positions

marsbit21m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片