Elizabeth Warren Presses OCC Over UAE Stake in World Liberty Application

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-27Last updated on 2026-02-27

Abstract

In a Senate Banking Committee hearing, Senator Elizabeth Warren questioned OCC Comptroller Jonathan Gould about the bank charter application for World Liberty, a company linked to former President Donald Trump. Warren raised concerns over a recent report alleging a UAE official secretly acquired a 49% stake in the company, which would require full disclosure under OCC rules. She argued that undisclosed foreign ownership poses national security and conflict of interest risks and could undermine public trust in financial regulations. Gould declined to discuss specific applications but assured that standard regulatory procedures would be followed. Warren requested access to unredacted documents for verification and insisted the application should be rejected if foreign ownership was not properly disclosed.

Senator Elizabeth Warren has questioned the head of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) in the Senate Banking Committee hearing about the bank charter application, which is linked to President Donald Trump’s World Liberty. The exchange mainly focuses on the proper disclosure of the company’s foreign ownership in its application to become a regulated U.S. bank.

Warren on UAE Stake’s

Warren referred to a recent report claiming that a UAE official secretly acquired a 49% stake in the World Liberty before the return of Trump. Under OCC rules, any shareholders holding 10% or more of the company applying for a bank charter must be fully disclosed. Warren asked the comptroller, Jonathan Gould, whether a large foreign stake was properly reported in the application.

Jonathan declined to discuss the details of any pending applications. He stated that the OCC would follow its normal regulatory procedures when reviewing the filing. Warren requested access to the unredacted application documents so the Senate Committee could verify compliance.

Warren argued that if the reported foreign ownership is not fully disclosed, then the application should be rejected. The senator raised national security and the conflict of interest concerns, saying that the foreign ownership of a U.S. bank tied to a sitting president could create a serious risk. She also warns that approving the charter without the proper transparency could damage the public trust in financial regulations.

Gould rejected the claims of political influence and maintained that the OCC would treat the application like any other. Lawmakers remain divided on how to regulate crypto companies seeking traditional banking licenses, particularly when foreign investors are involved.

Highlighted Crypto News:

MetaMask Card Goes Live in the U.S., Enabling Crypto Payments with On-Chain Rewards

TagsCryptocurrencyElizabeth Warren

Related Questions

QWhat did Senator Elizabeth Warren question the head of the OCC about in the Senate Banking Committee hearing?

AShe questioned him about the bank charter application linked to President Donald Trump's World Liberty, specifically focusing on the proper disclosure of the company's foreign ownership.

QAccording to the report Warren cited, what stake did a UAE official secretly acquire in World Liberty?

AA UAE official secretly acquired a 49% stake in World Liberty before the return of Donald Trump.

QWhat is the OCC's rule regarding the disclosure of shareholders in a bank charter application?

AOCC rules require that any shareholders holding 10% or more of the company applying for a bank charter must be fully disclosed.

QWhat two main concerns did Senator Warren raise regarding the undisclosed foreign stake?

AShe raised concerns about national security and the potential for a conflict of interest, stating that foreign ownership of a U.S. bank tied to a sitting president could create a serious risk.

QHow did Comptroller Jonathan Gould respond to Warren's request for details and her concerns about political influence?

AHe declined to discuss the details of any pending applications, stated the OCC would follow its normal regulatory procedures, and rejected the claims of political influence, maintaining the application would be treated like any other.

Related Reads

Anthropic Ban Controversy, OpenAI's Hundred-Billion Financing Dispute: What Is the Overseas Crypto Circle Discussing Today?

In the past 24 hours, the crypto market has witnessed a range of discussions from macro trends to ecosystem-specific developments. Key topics include the controversy over AI and national security boundaries, debates around OpenAI's record $110 billion private fundraising, and the potential impact of AI tools on tech employment. Anthropic refused a Pentagon request to remove safety restrictions on autonomous weapons and mass surveillance in its models, leading to a terminated $200M government contract and a divided public response. OpenAI secured massive funding from investors like NVIDIA and Amazon, though its significant losses sparked concerns about a potential tech bubble. Block's 70% engineering team layoffs, attributed to AI efficiency gains, intensified debates on AI's effect on jobs. In ecosystem news, Ethereum community showed optimism as Vitalik Buterin outlined a roadmap with specific timelines for ZK-EVM integration by 2026-2027. Morpho outperformed AAVE, with some attributing it to simpler governance. Solana integrated with SoFi bank, enabling 13.7M users to hold SOL directly. Base ecosystem saw experiments with AI Agents for trading and social interactions. Other notable events included Paradigm's planned $1.5B fund expansion into AI and robotics, Bitwise's XRP ETF application, and OpenAI firing an employee for insider trading on prediction markets. Hyperliquid emerged as the only profitable Digital Asset Treasury project, and regulatory discussions around prediction markets continued.

marsbit35m ago

Anthropic Ban Controversy, OpenAI's Hundred-Billion Financing Dispute: What Is the Overseas Crypto Circle Discussing Today?

marsbit35m ago

Gas Fees and Transaction Security: Avoiding Asset Drainage by Malicious Contracts

Blockchain transactions require gas fee as fuel, but malicious actors exploit this mechanism to drain assets through deceptive practices. Common traps include: 1) Unlimited token approvals, where users grant open-ended access to smart contracts, enabling unauthorized transfers; 2) Gas fee hijacking, where attackers manipulate transaction parameters or embed infinite loops to force excessive gas payments; 3) Fake approvals/transactions via phishing sites that mimic legitimate dApps to steal assets. Key preventive measures: - Apply minimal approval principles, authorizing only necessary token amounts and revoking unused permissions. - Manually set gas limits and prices using wallet advanced settings, avoiding defaults during high network congestion. - Verify contract addresses, transaction details, and DApp authenticity before confirming any transaction. - Use separate wallets for daily interactions and large holdings to isolate risks. If compromised: - Immediately freeze the wallet and revoke all suspicious approvals. - Preserve evidence (TxID, contract addresses) and report to platforms. - Seek professional assistance for large losses—avoid paying "recovery fees" (common secondary scams). Recommended tools: Approval checkers (e.g., Revoke.cash), block explorers (Etherscan), and real-time alert systems. Stay vigilant by scrutinizing every transaction and rejecting unsolicited links.

marsbit2h ago

Gas Fees and Transaction Security: Avoiding Asset Drainage by Malicious Contracts

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片