More Bitcoin Investors Slip Into Unrealized Losses Following Recent Selloff – Here Are The Numbers

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-06-06Last updated on 2026-06-06

Abstract

Bitcoin's recent selloff, pushing prices toward $60,000, has led to a significant increase in investor unrealized losses. Data shows the percentage of Bitcoin supply held at a profit has fallen to about 55%, approaching a critical low. Market analysts describe this as a distribution phase, indicating a potential large-scale transfer of holdings. Despite massive accumulation by entities like MicroStrategy and ETFs, removing over 1.2 million BTC from circulation, strong selling pressure persists, keeping prices subdued and testing key market support levels.

Bitcoin’s recent pullback has significantly flipped the sentiment across the market, with many predicting a more sustained downward performance toward the $60,000 price mark. Following this sharp decline, more investors are now underwater as BTC’s holders’ profitability strongly declines.

Bitcoin’s Sharp Decline Leaves More Holders Underwater

Given its persistent downward trend over the past weeks, the Bitcoin market dynamics are starting to see one of its most crucial changes in this cycle. One area that has significantly felt the heat of this ongoing bearish action is the holder profitability.

Currently, unrealized losses across the BTC market are experiencing a notable rise, underscoring the heightened pressure that volatility is placing on investors. CryptoQuant’s verified author and market expert, Darkfost, shared that BTC’s price has posted a 12.5% correction over the past week, pushing more investors into unrealized losses.

This increase in unrealized losses implies that many investors who entered the market during the most recent surge are now below their purchase cost as prices decline from recent highs. A sustained rise in this trend could trigger a shift in investors’ sentiment and behavior, leading to increased caution, reduced risk appetite, and a potential capitulation among some weak traders.

Source: Chart from Darkfost on X

According to fresh data, the percentage of supply held in profit has now fallen to about 55%, which is considered a notably low level. However, this level is still slightly above those seen in previous bear market cycles. In the past, bear markets were able to lower this indicator below 50%, indicating that the market was dominated by unrealized losses.

As seen on the chart, this key metric dropped to 53% in February this year. With the rate at which this metric is dropping now, Darkfost believes it will breach the 50% mark sooner than expected. While this remains a bearish development in the short term, especially for those with a long-term vision, this type of period has persistently represented profitable opportunities in the past.

Market Structure Showing A Massive Change Of Hands

Following his examination of this current market structure, Ki Young Ju, the founder of CryptoQuant, has declared this period a distribution phase that feels like a massive change of hands. At the time of the post, BTC’s investors’ average cost basis was around $53,000, which is crucial for the market. This is because bear markets have historically only ended when the price dropped below the realized price.

Given the institutional inflows and Michael Saylor’s Strategy barely selling any BTC, the founder believes that the level would be hard to revisit. However, current price action suggests unusually strong sell pressure that could push BTC to this level.

Since January 2023, MSTR has bought over 711,206 BTC and sold only 32 BTC, removing 711,174 BTC from circulation. Furthermore, ETFs absorbed 509,102 BTC, and MSTR purchased 650,706 BTC while the price was also at $63,000 in March 2024. Combined, that’s over 1,240,808 BTC removed from circulation, but the price is back at the same level.

Moving to exchanges reserves, about 2.7 million BTC are being held in addition to Satoshi’s estimated 1 million BTC holdings. Nearly half of exchange reserves, or more Bitcoin than Satoshi’s stack, have been consumed, and the price has not changed.

BTC trading at $61,899 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what is the current percentage of Bitcoin supply held in profit, and why is this level significant?

AThe current percentage of Bitcoin supply held in profit has fallen to about 55%. This is significant because it's considered a notably low level, and it is close to breaching the 50% mark, a threshold which historically indicated a market dominated by unrealized losses during previous bear cycles.

QWhat does CryptoQuant founder Ki Young Ju declare about the current Bitcoin market structure?

AKi Young Ju declares the current period a distribution phase that feels like a massive change of hands.

QWhat is the mentioned average cost basis for BTC investors, and what is its historical relevance?

AThe average cost basis for BTC investors was around $53,000 at the time of the analysis. This is historically relevant because bear markets have typically only ended when the price dropped below the realized price (a metric closely related to the average cost basis).

QHow much Bitcoin have ETFs and MicroStrategy collectively removed from circulation since January 2023, according to the article?

AAccording to the article, ETFs have absorbed 509,102 BTC and MicroStrategy has purchased 650,706 BTC (after accounting for minimal sales), collectively removing over 1,240,808 BTC from circulation.

QWhat key effect has Bitcoin's recent 12.5% price correction had on investors?

AThe recent 12.5% price correction has pushed more Bitcoin investors into a state of holding unrealized losses, meaning their current holdings are valued below their original purchase cost.

Related Reads

Conversation with Co-founder of Hyperdash: Why is Hyperliquid Still Severely Undervalued?

Interview Summary with Hanson Birringer, Co-founder of Hyperdash: Why Hyperliquid Remains Undervalued In an interview on *The Rollup*, Hanson Birringer, Co-founder and Chief Revenue Officer of Hyperdash—a trading data analytics platform for Hyperliquid—shared his investment thesis on the Hyperliquid ecosystem. He described Hyperliquid as a pure play on three key crypto super-trends: perpetual contracts, real-world assets (RWAs), and stablecoins. The platform is an open-source, decentralized, and high-performance financial system uniquely positioned to bridge traditional institutional capital with decentralized finance. Birringer highlighted Hyperliquid's leadership in perpetual DEX trading and its recent innovation of RWA perpetual contracts. He emphasized the significance of USDC becoming a core quoting asset, which, by allocating 90% of its backend yield from assets like US treasuries to a protocol buyback fund, creates substantial, programmatic buy pressure for the Hype token. He addressed regulatory challenges, noting that Hyperliquid's policy team is actively engaging with US regulators like the CFTC to establish clear rules for decentralized venues. Once achieved, regulated brokers could route orders directly to Hyperliquid's backend, tapping into its low-cost liquidity layer. Regarding revenue, Birringer was optimistic, citing the immense size of traditional financial markets. Even capturing a small fraction of global trading volume in products like RWA perpetuals could lead to exponential growth for the protocol. The recently launched Grayscale Hyperliquid ETF, seeded by their SPV (Hyper Holdings Global), provides a compliant on-ramp for institutional investors drawn to the clear "cash flow + token buyback" model. Finally, he discussed Hyperdash's acquisition of Imperator, enhancing its data and node infrastructure to serve both retail traders and traditional asset managers. His bullish case rests on Hyperliquid's potential to provide unprecedented global access to dollar-based capital markets. He struggled to articulate a bear case, seeing the long-term trends of internet adoption and financial inclusion as powerful tailwinds.

marsbit1h ago

Conversation with Co-founder of Hyperdash: Why is Hyperliquid Still Severely Undervalued?

marsbit1h ago

DeepSeek V4 'Full-Blooded Edition' Leaked, Could Be Released As Early As Tomorrow

The highly anticipated full release of DeepSeek V4 is imminent, expected to launch as early as tomorrow after nearly three months of waiting. A select group has already received access to the GA (General Availability) beta, which includes two versions: DeepSeek V4 Flash and DeepSeek V4 Pro. Early testers report that V4's overall performance is close to the level of Opus 4.8, with coding capabilities rivaling GPT-5.6 Sol. Its agent abilities are significantly enhanced, and 3D/SVG generation has improved notably. While it may not surpass the recently released Kimi K3 in performance, its expected price point is significantly lower. The official release will introduce a new "peak/off-peak" pricing model for its API. For example, deepseek-v4-pro will cost $0.87 per million output tokens during standard times and $1.74 during peak hours. The flash version is even more aggressive at $0.28/$0.56 per million tokens, with cached input tokens priced extremely low at $0.0028. This makes V4 a strong contender in terms of cost-effectiveness, potentially offering Opus-level capabilities at a fraction of the cost, continuing DeepSeek's reputation as a "price disruptor" in the AI market. Initial demos showcasing V4's capabilities have begun circulating, including generated 3D simulation games, HTML games blending elements of Minecraft and No Man's Sky, and classic games like a "Cut the Rope" clone. The final GA version is set to replace the older deepseek-chat and deepseek-reasoner models, which will be retired on July 24th.

marsbit1h ago

DeepSeek V4 'Full-Blooded Edition' Leaked, Could Be Released As Early As Tomorrow

marsbit1h ago

WEEX Labs Weekly Observation: The 'Power Restructuring' of AI Infrastructure and the 'Deep Dive Movement' into the Real Economy

WEEX Labs Weekly Review: AI Infrastructure's "Power Restructuring" and the "Deep Dive" into the Real Economy Mid-July 2026 marks a pivotal shift in the global AI industry. The allocation of computing power is transferring from cloud giants to compute resource owners, while the core value of AI is solidifying around its penetration into physical industry, moving beyond the race for model parameters. The era of fragmented model development is over, replaced by a capital-intensive, integrated chain driven by hard tech. Key developments this week include Meta's planned entry into the cloud computing market with "MetaCompute." This move by social media giants with massive GPU clusters challenges traditional cloud providers like AWS, integrating compute, models, and data into one-stop services, which will squeeze smaller rental providers and shift enterprise focus towards underlying model ecosystems. Chinese foundational models like DeepSeek-V4 and Tencent's Hy-3 are pushing towards "utility" status through open-source releases and extreme cost reductions via MoE architectures. This lowers entry barriers for enterprises, allowing them to focus resources on private deployment and deep business integration. Embodied intelligence, particularly humanoid robots, is transitioning from lab demos to real-world factory applications, driven by policies promoting large-scale, practical deployment in logistics and manufacturing. The value focus is shifting from spectacle to stable industrial data and real operational efficiency. Global governance, through forums like WAIC, is evolving from theoretical ethics to practical operational frameworks for "Sovereign AI," raising geopolitical compliance barriers and making auditability and data sovereignty core design requirements from the outset. WEEX Labs Insights: The current transformation shows AI's prosperity is deeply embedding into the fabric of global manufacturing. Strategic recommendations include: 1) leveraging open-source models for private, proprietary knowledge bases; 2) maintaining cloud provider diversity to avoid vendor lock-in from integrated model ecosystems; and 3) seeking opportunities in the "embodied infrastructure" supporting robots, such as data collection, industrial simulation, and factory AI adaptation services.

marsbit1h ago

WEEX Labs Weekly Observation: The 'Power Restructuring' of AI Infrastructure and the 'Deep Dive Movement' into the Real Economy

marsbit1h ago

Is WEEX TradFi Reliable? What You Should Know Before Your First Trade of U.S. Stock Tokens

In recent years, cryptocurrency users have expanded their focus beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum to include popular traditional financial (TradFi) assets like Nvidia, Apple, and Tesla stocks. This shift raises key questions: What do these TradFi assets represent on crypto trading platforms? How do they differ from traditional stock ownership? And how can users assess the reliability of platforms offering such products? TradFi products, such as those offered by WEEX TradFi (including NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, TSLA, and QQQ tokens), are blurring the lines between crypto and traditional markets. They allow users to trade based on the price movements of traditional assets within a familiar digital asset trading environment. However, it's crucial to understand that trading a "stock token" is not equivalent to owning the actual stock. Users are participating in price speculation, not gaining shareholder rights like dividends or voting. A key feature of these products is 7x24 trading, offering flexibility beyond traditional market hours. While convenient, this also introduces unique risks, such as potential liquidity gaps and volatility when underlying markets are closed. For users evaluating TradFi products, reliability hinges on transparency and risk management. Critical factors include understanding the product mechanism, how prices track the underlying assets, and the associated risks—especially when using leverage. Popular stocks and indices are still subject to company performance, macroeconomic shifts, and sector trends. Ultimately, TradFi represents a new gateway connecting crypto users to global markets. The future points toward integrated trading environments where the distinction between "crypto investor" and "traditional investor" fades. For newcomers, a platform's reliability stems not from promises, but from a clear understanding of the product, a comprehensive view of risks, and informed judgment of the platform's capabilities.

marsbit1h ago

Is WEEX TradFi Reliable? What You Should Know Before Your First Trade of U.S. Stock Tokens

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

906 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片