Ethereum Completes Another Key Technical Advancement, Can It Achieve a Leap Forward by 2026?

marsbitPubblicato 2025-12-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-22

Introduzione

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced a major technical breakthrough in zkEVM development, achieving a dramatic reduction in block proof generation time—from 16 minutes to just 16 seconds—with a 45-fold decrease in cost. Certain zkVMs can now prove 99% of mainnet blocks in under 10 seconds on target hardware. However, EF emphasizes that raw speed is meaningless without proven security. Several mathematical conjectures underlying popular STARK-based zkEVMs have recently been disproven, reducing their security guarantees. The core focus has now shifted from throughput to provable safety, with L1 zkEVMs required to meet a 128-bit security standard to prevent risks like token forgery or state corruption. EF released a three-phase roadmap aiming for full compliance by December 2026: 1. By end-February 2026, all zkEVM teams must integrate with EF’s soundcalc security tool. 2. By end-May, achieve intermediate goals like 100-bit provable security. 3. By end-December, reach 128-bit provable security with formal verification of recursive proof systems. Key technologies like WHIR and JaggedPCS are being deployed to improve efficiency. Challenges remain, including on-chain implementation, dynamic security parameter adjustments, and uneven progress among teams. Once achieved, secure zkEVMs could allow Ethereum to increase gas limits safely, enhance L1 capacity, and blur the lines between L1 and L2 execution. The race for reliability is now the central theme for Ethereum in 2026.

The zkEVM ecosystem has achieved a performance leap after a year of intensive efforts, reducing Ethereum block proof time from 16 minutes to 16 seconds, with a cost reduction of 45 times. Participating zkVMs can now complete proofs for 99% of mainnet blocks within 10 seconds on target hardware.

On December 18, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) announced the implementation of a real-time proof mechanism and the elimination of performance bottlenecks. However, it emphasized that the real challenge lies in reliability, as speed without security support becomes a burden. Additionally, several zkEVMs based on STARK algorithms have had their underlying mathematical conjectures disproven in recent months, leading to a reduction in security levels.

Previously, in July, EF set comprehensive real-time proof goals covering multiple dimensions such as latency, hardware, and security. These have now been met through the EthProofs benchmark tests.

The core shift is from pursuing throughput to prioritizing provable security, clearly stating that L1-level zkEVMs must achieve a 128-bit security standard, aligning with mainstream cryptographic norms. This is because forged proofs could lead to critical risks such as token counterfeiting and L1 state tampering, making security margins non-negotiable.

EF simultaneously unveiled a three-phase security roadmap:

  1. By the end of February 2026, all zkEVM teams must integrate their proof systems with EF's soundcalc security assessment tool to standardize security calculations;
  2. Achieve the Glamsterdam standard by the end of May, meeting interim goals like 100-bit provable security;
  3. Complete the H-star final goal by the end of December, achieving 128-bit provable security and providing formal security arguments for recursive topological structures.

To meet these goals, EF mentioned key technical tools like WHIR and JaggedPCS, which can improve efficiency by optimizing proof generation and avoiding computational waste, while techniques like recursive topologies help reduce proof size.

However, multiple challenges remain: real-time proofs have not yet been implemented on-chain, leaving actual validator performance in question; security parameters need dynamic adjustment as mathematical conjectures are disproven; it is uncertain if all teams can meet deadlines; and formal verification projects for recursive architectures are still in early stages, with uneven ecosystem development.

Notably, compliant zkEVMs could enable Ethereum to increase the Gas limit, enhancing block capacity while ensuring staking feasibility, promoting L1 as a trusted settlement layer, and blurring the boundaries between L2 and L1 execution.

With the performance sprint concluded, the core focus of the zkEVM ecosystem has shifted to achieving sufficiently reliable security proofs without relying on easily disprovable conjectures, to support trillion-dollar asset scales. The security competition has now officially begun, and it will be the main theme for Ethereum in 2026.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat major technical achievement did the Ethereum Foundation announce on December 18th regarding zkEVM?

AThe Ethereum Foundation announced the implementation of a real-time proof mechanism and the elimination of performance bottlenecks, reducing block proof time from 16 minutes to 16 seconds and cutting costs by 45 times.

QWhat is the core shift in focus for zkEVM development according to the Ethereum Foundation?

AThe core shift is from pursuing throughput to prioritizing provable security, requiring L1-level zkEVMs to achieve a 128-bit security standard to prevent risks like token forgery and L1 state tampering.

QWhat are the three phases of the security roadmap set by the Ethereum Foundation for zkEVM teams?

A1. By February 2026, all zkEVM teams must integrate their proof systems with EF's soundcalc security assessment tool. 2. By May 2026, achieve the Glamsterdam standard with 100-bit provable security. 3. By December 2026, complete the H-star goal with 128-bit provable security and formal security arguments for recursive topology structures.

QWhat challenges remain for zkEVM despite the performance improvements?

AChallenges include real-time proofs not yet being on-chain, security parameters needing dynamic adjustments due to disproven mathematical conjectures, uncertainty about teams meeting deadlines, and early-stage formal verification for recursive architectures.

QHow could achieving the security goals for zkEVM benefit Ethereum's future?

AIt could enable Ethereum to increase Gas limits, enhance block capacity while ensuring staking feasibility, solidify L1 as a trusted settlement layer, and blur the boundaries between L2 and L1 execution.

Letture associate

Global Asset Rotation: Why Does Liquidity Drive the Cryptocurrency Cycle? (Part 1)

This article introduces a new series on global asset allocation and rotation, arguing that liquidity—not new narratives—is the primary driver of cryptocurrency market cycles. While narratives like RWA or X-402 can attract attention, they are triggers, not fundamental drivers. The real force is capital flow: ample liquidity amplifies even weak narratives, while liquidity contraction undermains the most compelling ones. The framework begins by mapping global assets not by traditional labels (stocks, bonds, commodities) but by their roles and dependencies within economic and liquidity cycles. Cryptocurrency is reclassified not as a traditional risk asset (like equities, which have cash flows and valuation models) but as a non-cash-flow alternative asset. Its price action is driven primarily by capital inflows and outflows, making it highly sensitive to liquidity and risk appetite. Five key macro indicators are identified as core drivers: interest rates (especially real rates), inflation metrics (CPI, PCE), economic growth indicators (PMI, GDP), systemic liquidity (central bank balance sheets, money supply), and risk appetite (volatility indices, credit spreads). A causal chain is proposed: inflation influences interest rates, which affect liquidity, which then drives risk preference and ultimately asset prices. The U.S. remains the anchor for global capital flows, and understanding its monetary policy cycle is crucial. During loose monetary conditions, risk assets like crypto thrive; during tightening, defensive assets like cash and bonds outperform. The article concludes that a structured framework focusing on macro drivers and cyclical patterns is essential for understanding asset rotation, avoiding emotional decisions, and identifying when liquidity shifts toward high-risk assets like cryptocurrency.

marsbit12 min fa

Global Asset Rotation: Why Does Liquidity Drive the Cryptocurrency Cycle? (Part 1)

marsbit12 min fa

From Aztec to Zcash: Privacy Evolving from 'Gray Industry Tool' to 'Institutional Necessity'

From Aztec to Zcash: The Rise of Pragmatic Privacy in Blockchain In 2025, blockchain privacy evolved from a niche concern to a mainstream priority, driven by the concept of "pragmatic privacy" that balances individual anonymity with regulatory compliance. This shift is marked by the strong performance of privacy-focused assets like Zcash and new institutional initiatives. Several new privacy-centric blockchains launched or advanced significantly. Aztec Network's Ignition L2 mainnet went live, raising over 6,100 ETH. Nillion launched its "blind computer" mainnet for encrypted data computation. Cosmos-based Namada introduced a "composable privacy" L1, while Miden spun out from Polygon to build its own privacy chain. Umbra raised $154.9 million in an ICO to build on Solana. Horzen transitioned to a Base L3 privacy solution. Institutions are actively embracing privacy. Coinbase hired a team from Iron Fish to develop privacy primitives for Base. Circle is testing a privacy-preserving wrapped USDC (USDCx) on Aleo. The Canton Network and EY's Nightfall L2 are focusing on confidential enterprise solutions. The Ethereum Foundation formed a dedicated "Privacy Cluster" and an "Institutional Privacy Working Group." Vitalik Buterin also launched Kohaku, an open-source wallet framework for compliant privacy. At the application layer, tools like 0xbow's Privacy Pools (based on Vitalik's research) and Railgun (using "proof of innocence") allow users to anonymize transactions without aiding illicit activity. Zcash's shielded pool supply grew to nearly 25%, indicating steady adoption. This collective progress signals that privacy is no longer a marginal feature but a core institutional and user requirement.

比推1 h fa

From Aztec to Zcash: Privacy Evolving from 'Gray Industry Tool' to 'Institutional Necessity'

比推1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di A A sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片