Why Ethereum’s long-term potential remains intact DESPITE 30% weekly drop

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-06Last updated on 2026-02-06

Abstract

Despite a sharp 30% weekly drop and a 45% decline from its September peak, Ethereum's long-term potential remains strong. The sell-off is largely driven by macro risk-off sentiment, panic selling, and short-term holder exits rather than fundamental weaknesses. On-chain data reveals growing long-term conviction: staking rates have reached a new all-time high with 30.3% of ETH staked, and exchange balances have fallen sharply. Vitalik Buterin’s emphasis on scaling and innovation—rather than short-term hype—further supports a long-term growth narrative. While technical indicators and market sentiment appear weak, underlying metrics suggest continued bullishness for Ethereum’s future.

On the macro side, the market’s risk-off mood has hit most risk assets, and short-term holders are usually the first to fold. So far in Q1, pretty much all the big-cap coins are feeling the pressure, with weak hands shaking out.

That said, any rebound really comes down to long-term holders keeping their conviction. Take Ethereum [ETH], as an example. It’s roughly 45% off its September peak at $3,500, putting a lot of LTHs underwater.

On top of that, Vitalik’s recent comments haven’t helped sentiment. His take on the “copy-paste” approach for L2s and alternative L1s has stirred some extra FUD, leaving traders unsure about ETH’s short-term direction.

That reaction isn’t too surprising though. Lately, Ethereum, and blockchains in general, aren’t really defined by price moves. The real story is deeper adoption, which relies on solid infrastructure rather than “hype.”

Buterin’s comments fit that narrative. He recently stressed that scaling should be the focus, instead of just pumping out more L1s, even for EVM chains. The real push should be on innovation, improving privacy, building more apps etc.

In short, his vision leans towards long-term growth for blockchain and Ethereum by extension. Naturally, the question arises – Is ETH really setting the stage for the long run, with recent sell-offs just a short-term shakeout?

What Ethereum’s metrics say about the road ahead

Looking at Ethereum, this breakdown isn’t just profit-taking.

In fact, ETH has emerged as the worst-performing asset in this downturn, dropping by about 30% just this week. Consequently, the pullback seems more like a sentiment-driven crash, fueled by forced exits and panic selling.

And yet, on-chain metrics might just tell us a different story.

Ethereum’s staking rate just hit a new all-time high, with roughly 30.3% of all ETH now staked. Exchange balances have continued to fall sharply too, down to only 16.2 million ETH.

Taken together, this divergence backs AMBCrypto’s thesis.

From a technical standpoint, the short-term picture is rough. Rising FUD, ETF outflows, massive deleveraging, and a plunging ETH/BTC ratio have pushed Ethereum’s market share to a multi-month low of under 11%.

That said, falling exchange reserves and rising staking volumes (two key metrics of long-term conviction) suggest the market may still be bullish on Buterin’s vision, reinforcing confidence in Ethereum’s long-term potential.

In this light, ETH’s recent sell-offs look more like macro-driven volatility and broader risk-off fear, than a problem with Ethereum itself. This makes this pullback feel like a short-term shakeout, rather than a fundamental shift.


Final Thoughts

  • Ethereum’s 30–45% pullback and market volatility reflect macro-driven fear and weak-hand exits, not a loss of conviction.
  • Rising staking rates and falling exchange balances mean that long-term holders may be staying bullish on Ethereum.

Related Reads

Behind the 2000 BTC Incident: The Fundamental Problem of CEX Ledgers

On February 6, Bithumb, a South Korean cryptocurrency exchange, mistakenly distributed 2,000 BTC each to 249 users due to a unit error during a promotional event—intending to give away 2,000 KRW (≈$1.4) per user. The total erroneous distribution amounted to 62,000 BTC, worth approximately $41.5–44 billion. Although these assets existed only in Bithumb’s internal ledger and not on-chain, they were tradable on the platform, causing BTC/KRW prices to drop nearly 17% within minutes and triggering over $400 million in derivatives liquidations. Bithumb responded within 35 minutes, freezing affected accounts and recovering over 99% of the misallocated BTC. The remaining 1,788 BTC were covered by the exchange’s own funds. The incident exposed a fundamental flaw in centralized exchanges (CEXs): their reliance on internal accounting systems that allow rapid balance adjustments without corresponding on-chain assets. This creates systemic risk, as user balances are essentially IOU entries rather than real assets. The article draws parallels with historical failures like Mt.Gox and FTX, where discrepancies between internal ledgers and actual reserves led to catastrophic collapses. While Bithumb’s quick response limited damage, the event underscores the structural vulnerabilities of CEXs, prompting South Korean regulators to consider stricter oversight. The piece concludes that such incidents highlight the inherent trust asymmetry in CEX operations, where users rely on exchanges to honor ledger entries as real assets—a risk that remains ever-present.

比推24m ago

Behind the 2000 BTC Incident: The Fundamental Problem of CEX Ledgers

比推24m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片