$2T lost in 140 days: Why this crypto market crash looks different

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-24Last updated on 2026-02-24

Abstract

The crypto market has experienced a severe crash, losing $2 trillion in value over 140 days, with Bitcoin falling nearly 50% and Ethereum down 62% from their peaks. Altcoins like Solana dropped even more sharply, with some smaller tokens losing up to 90% of their value. Unlike previous cycles, this downturn appears more severe and prolonged, driven by a combination of factors including miner capitulation, weak post-halving demand, and significant forced liquidations exceeding $600 million in 24 hours. Additionally, geopolitical tensions and U.S. tariff policies have pushed investors toward safer assets like the U.S. dollar and gold. Key on-chain metrics such as negative MVRV ratios for Bitcoin and Ethereum indicate widespread losses, but historical patterns of oversold rebounds may not hold this time. The market remains under pressure, with no clear signs of immediate recovery.

For years, the crypto industry argued that institutional adoption would drive price momentum and prevent major crashes.

Currently, that narrative appears broken as the market is not just slowing; it is showing signs of deep struggle.

Crypto market tests hard waters

As per an analyst, in the past 140 days, more than $2 trillion in value has been wiped out. The total crypto market cap has shrunk sharply. Bitcoin [BTC] has fallen to around $63,228, nearly 50% below its peak as of writing.

Ethereum [ETH] was trading near $1,825, down about 62% from its high. The biggest damage, however, is in altcoins. Solana [SOL] has dropped around 68%, and many smaller tokens have lost up to 90% of their value.

Instead of fear and greed, the market now feels exhausted and defeated. This feels bigger than a normal correction.

Factors behind this downturn

The key question now is whether this is simply the end of another market cycle or something more long-lasting.

If looked carefully, after the excitement of 2025, investors moved quickly through worry and are now stuck in panic mode.

Fear levels are extremely high, and many retail traders are hesitant to act. At the same time, large and experienced investors are closely watching key indicators like the MVRV ratio.

Bitcoin’s 30-day MVRV is at -10.33%, and Ethereum’s is at -14.04%, showing that most people who bought recently are losing money.

In the past, such levels often suggested that prices were oversold and could bounce back. However, late 2025 showed that low prices can stay low for a long time.

Additionally, the 2024 Bitcoin halving was expected to push prices higher by reducing supply, as it did in past cycles. But instead of strong demand, 2026 has brought weak buying interest.

Even though earlier cycles saw major rallies after halvings, Bitcoin is now showing signs of exhaustion rather than growth.

Additionally, miners are earning more from transaction fees than before, but the shift away from block rewards has not been smooth, putting pressure on Bitcoin’s “digital gold” image.

Political factors also shape the crypto market

The pressure intensified on the 21st of February when U.S. President Donald Trump announced a 15% global tariff.

That decision made investors move money into safer assets like the U.S. dollar and gold. And rising geopolitical tensions are adding even more pressure to an already fragile market.

The stress in the market is most clearly seen among Bitcoin miners. Recently, mining difficulty has fallen, which usually happens when miners turn off machines because they are no longer profitable.

At the same time, miners’ income has dropped due to lower prices and fewer transactions. To survive, many miners are selling their Bitcoin holdings to cover expenses.

This situation, known as miner capitulation, often happens near market bottoms and removes weaker players from the network. However, in the short term, these forced sales add more pressure to prices and make it harder for the market to recover quickly.

Liquidation is another catalyst

While global tariffs and pressure on miners started the decline, more than $600 million in forced liquidations in just 24 hours made the crash much worse.

When prices began to fall, many traders who had borrowed money to bet on higher prices were forced out of their positions, which pushed prices down even faster.

Still, the big question remains unanswered. Is this the final crash before the next recovery driven by the halving cycle, or the beginning of a new, weaker era for crypto?

For now, the data suggests that until liquidations slow down and MVRV levels improve, prices may still have room to fall.


Final Summary

  • Negative MVRV levels reflect widespread losses but do not guarantee an immediate recovery.
  • Weak post-halving demand has challenged Bitcoin’s long-standing growth narrative.

Related Questions

QWhat is the total value that has been wiped out of the crypto market in the past 140 days according to the article?

AMore than $2 trillion in value has been wiped out.

QWhat key Bitcoin metric is at -10.33%, indicating that recent buyers are losing money?

ABitcoin's 30-day MVRV (Market Value to Realized Value) ratio is at -10.33%.

QWhat major political event on February 21st intensified pressure on the crypto market, according to the article?

AU.S. President Donald Trump announced a 15% global tariff, which caused investors to move money into safer assets.

QWhat is the term used to describe the situation where miners are selling their Bitcoin holdings to cover expenses, often happening near market bottoms?

AThe situation is known as miner capitulation.

QWhy has the 2024 Bitcoin halving not led to a price increase as it did in past cycles, according to the article?

AInstead of strong demand, 2026 has brought weak buying interest, and Bitcoin is showing signs of exhaustion rather than growth.

Related Reads

Can the Dual Currency Win Strategy Really Weather Bull and Bear Markets? A 6-Year Backtest Provides the Answer

"Can the Dual Currency Win (Wheel Strategy) truly weather bull and bear markets? A 6-year backtest (2020-2026) on Bitcoin and Ethereum provides the answer. The study compared two approaches: the 'Standard Rolling Strike' method, which dynamically sells covered calls at 105% of the current spot price, and the 'Fixed Anchor' method, which stubbornly sells calls at the original, higher cost basis after a drop, refusing to sell at a loss. Key findings reveal a significant performance gap. The Standard method, while sacrificing some upside, demonstrated superior risk-adjusted returns. For a 50/50 BTC/ETH portfolio, it achieved a +1347.32% total return with a -49.9% max drawdown and a Sharpe Ratio of 0.983, outperforming both Buy & Hold (+1665.52%, -77.8% drawdown, 0.85 Sharpe) on risk metrics and crushing the Fixed Anchor method (+592.77%, -61.8% drawdown, 0.766 Sharpe). The data shows the Standard strategy's strength lies in its dynamic adjustment mechanism, continuously resetting its strike price to balance income generation with participation in bullish trends. Conversely, the Fixed Anchor strategy's poor performance highlights the costly pitfall of the 'anchoring bias'—the human tendency to fixate on the entry price. This psychological trap cripples the ability to collect meaningful premium during bear markets and causes investors to miss subsequent bull runs when positions are called away at breakeven. The conclusion is clear: discipline and adaptability are far more valuable than the psychological comfort of 'breaking even.' The true risk in trending assets is not volatility, but being anchored to a past price, which severely limits future upside potential."

marsbit15m ago

Can the Dual Currency Win Strategy Really Weather Bull and Bear Markets? A 6-Year Backtest Provides the Answer

marsbit15m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片