L'adoption bancaire du Bitcoin atteint 32 %, mais 'nous en sommes encore au début', déclare Saylor de Strategy

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-15Last updated on 2026-07-15

Abstract

L'adoption du Bitcoin par les principales banques mondiales a atteint un taux global de 32%, selon l'indice de Michael Saylor, fondateur de MicroStrategy, qui estime toutefois que la traction en est encore à ses débuts. Fidelity caracole en tête avec un score de 71%, suivie par BNY Mellon (46%) et Goldman Sachs (45%). L'indice révèle que les banques privilégient actuellement les ETF Spot Bitcoin comme garantie plutôt que le BTC physique, une adoption du crédit sur ces actifs restant relativement faible. Cette situation met en perspective la vision de MicroStrategy de devenir une "banque Bitcoin", qui semble encore lointaine car le BTC n'est pas pleinement traité comme une collatéral de haute qualité. Parallèlement, MicroStrategy a porté ses réserves de trésorerie à 3 milliards de dollars, lui assurant environ 20 mois de couverture pour ses obligations, se rapprochant ainsi des recommandations de JPMorgan.

Le Bitcoin a connu une accélération de son adoption par les grandes banques mondiales, mais cette dynamique en est "encore à ses débuts". C'est ce qu'affirme Michael Saylor, fondateur de Strategy, la plus grande société de trésorerie BTC au monde. Dans un nouvel Indice d'Adoption Bancaire du Bitcoin (Bitcoin Banking Adoption Index) récemment publié, couvrant le trading d'ETF, le crédit et plus encore, Saylor a ajouté,

L'adoption du Bitcoin par les grandes banques s'accélère, mais reste précoce : 32 % globalement selon les mesures de l'indice.

Source : Strategy

Fidelity est en tête de la course à l'adoption avec une note de 71 %, obtenant un score complet pour la garde, le BTC, le trading d'ETF ainsi que l'émission de stablecoins. BNY Mellon arrive en deuxième position avec un score de 46 %, tandis que Goldman Sachs ferme le trio de tête avec une note de 45 %.

Parmi les autres grands acteurs mondiaux bien classés figuraient l'espagnol Banco Santander, le français Société Générale et le britannique Standard Chartered.

Strategy envisage-t-elle toujours de devenir une "banque Bitcoin" ?

La partie la plus intéressante de ce nouvel indice composite est la section "crédit", c'est-à-dire les banques qui permettent d'obtenir du crédit contre du BTC au comptant ou des dérivés comme l'iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) de BlackRock. En d'autres termes, les banques qui autorisent l'effet de levier ou proposent du crédit en utilisant du BTC au comptant ou des ETF comme garantie.

En 2026, la plupart des banques étaient davantage enclines à utiliser les ETF sur BTC au comptant comme garantie, plutôt que le BTC au comptant lui-même. Cependant, les cercles vides sur le graphique signifient que l'adoption de la marge sur BTC ou sur ETF était encore relativement faible.

Ce point est particulièrement important car Saylor a évoqué l'idée de positionner Strategy comme "la première banque Bitcoin au monde". Selon lui, la société pourrait utiliser son vaste portefeuille de BTC comme garantie pour créer de nouveaux instruments de crédit au-delà du STRC et s'associer à des banques de premier plan dans ce but.

Les 32 % d'adoption par les banques sont louables. Cependant, l'indice d'adoption montre clairement que le BTC n'est pas encore pleinement considéré comme une garantie de haute qualité, du moins en 2026. Par extension, cela signifie que sa vision de devenir une "banque BTC" pourrait encore être loin d'être viable.

Il est intéressant de noter que Metaplanet explore une approche similaire pour le marché des obligations japonaises.

Dans d'autres développements, Strategy a porté ses réserves de trésorerie à 3 milliards de dollars après une vente d'actions MSTR de 467 millions de dollars. Cela a effectivement augmenté sa couverture de ses obligations financières à 20 mois.

Source : Strategy

Il semble que la société suivait en partie les recommandations des analystes de JPMorgan qui préconisaient une réserve de trésorerie de 24 à 36 mois en vendant davantage d'actions MSTR, et non ses avoirs en BTC.

Dans l'ensemble, les rêves de "banque Bitcoin" de Strategy semblent encore lointains pour l'instant. Néanmoins, il existe une dynamique au sein des banques qui pourrait déterminer si ce projet sera viable à l'avenir.


Résumé final

  • L'adoption du Bitcoin par les banques a bondi de 32 %, mais les ETF sur BTC au comptant semblent être préférés au BTC physique pour les opérations sur marge.
  • Strategy a porté ses réserves de trésorerie à 3 milliards de dollars, soit une couverture de 20 mois, juste en dessous des 24 mois recommandés par JPMorgan.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QSelon Michael Saylor, à quel niveau est l'adoption du Bitcoin par les grandes banques en 2026, et que signifie cette étape ?

AL'adoption du Bitcoin par les grandes banques a atteint 32% selon l'indice publié, mais Michael Saylor estime que c'est "toujours tôt" dans le processus d'adoption.

QQuelles sont les trois premières banques du classement d'adoption du Bitcoin selon l'indice de Strategy, et quel est leur score ?

ALes trois premières banques sont Fidelity (71%), BNY Mellon (46%) et Goldman Sachs (45%).

QPourquoi la section 'crédit' de l'indice est-elle décrite comme la partie la plus intéressante, et que révèle-t-elle sur l'utilisation du Bitcoin ?

ALa section 'crédit' est la plus intéressante car elle évalue si les banques acceptent le BTC spot ou les ETF Bitcoin comme garantie pour des prêts. Elle révèle que l'adoption à cette fin est encore relativement faible, les ETF étant souvent préférés au BTC physique.

QQuel est le projet visionnaire de Michael Saylor pour Strategy, et pourquoi sa faisabilité est-elle remise en question par les données de l'indice ?

AMichael Saylor envisage de faire de Strategy "la première banque Bitcoin au monde" en utilisant ses importantes réserves de BTC comme garantie pour créer de nouveaux instruments de crédit. Cependant, l'indice montre que le Bitcoin n'est pas encore pleinement traité comme une garantie de haute qualité, ce qui signifie que cette vision pourrait ne pas être viable à court terme.

QQuelles mesures financières Strategy a-t-elle récemment prises concernant ses réserves de trésorerie, et en réponse à quelle recommandation ?

AStrategy a augmenté ses réserves de trésorerie à 3 milliards de dollars, lui assurant une couverture de ses obligations financières sur 20 mois. Cela a été réalisé en vendant des actions MSTR et suit en partie la recommandation de JPMorgan d'avoir une réserve de trésorerie couvrant 24 à 36 mois.

Related Reads

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit41m ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit41m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit41m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit41m ago

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbit51m ago

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbit51m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.4k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片