The Ethereum Foundation Has Perished, Long Live a Plurality of Ethereum Organizations

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-07-10Last updated on 2026-07-10

Abstract

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has entered a period of significant upheaval, marked by major organizational restructuring and a shift towards a more decentralized leadership model. The EF's Protocol Support Team has officially disbanded, part of what is described as its largest-ever round of layoffs, cutting 20% of its staff. This follows the high-profile resignation of Executive Director Aya Wang and the departure of at least eight senior figures this year. This internal transformation coincides with the rise of new, independent non-profit organizations like Ethlabs and Ethereum Institutional, founded by former EF researchers. These entities aim to take on roles in research, development, and institutional adoption that were previously associated with the EF, signaling a fragmentation of the ecosystem's central guiding body. Simultaneously, the EF's security team is evolving its approach by deploying specialized AI agents to perform red-team testing on the Ethereum network, a process that has already identified real vulnerabilities. While the EF states AI complements rather than replaces human researchers, this technological shift presents further questions about the foundation's future structure and staffing. Criticism of the EF's centralized decision-making and market influence has been growing within the community. Faced with these internal reforms, external competition, and technological changes, the article suggests the Ethereum Foundation may be transitioning from a ce...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser 2010)

Last evening, the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team officially announced that the team has been formally dissolved. Previously, Wang Xiaowei, the co-executive director of the Ethereum Foundation, who was seen as "one of the representative figures of EF organizational reform," has also formally resigned. So far this year, at least 8 senior personnel have left the Ethereum Foundation.

On the other side of organizational and personnel changes are the encroachment and functional replacement of the Ethereum Foundation organization by non-profit independent institutions such as EthLabs and Ethereum Institutional; it is also technological progress like the recent adoption of AI agents for red-team testing of the ETH network by the Ethereum Foundation security team, which discovered real vulnerabilities.

As the ETH price faces wave after wave of industry scrutiny, what lies before the Ethereum Foundation are the more complex and diverse contradictions and tests following internal reforms. Related to this is the divisive transformation that Ethereum's leading body is now directly confronting.

The Era of Decline for the Ethereum Foundation: Rise of Contenders, Brain Drain, and the AI Shift

The Ethereum Foundation (hereinafter referred to as EF) has long been criticized for its rigid system, decision-making by a minority, organizational value, and market-influencing sell-offs. Criticisms within the Ethereum community are particularly fierce. Not long ago, Bankless founder David Hoffman even went so far as to "sell his last ETH holdings" to express his dissatisfaction with EF, calling on the Ethereum community to build the ecosystem in their own way.

Now, the formal dissolution of EF's Protocol Support Team has exposed the organization's internal conflicts and crisis of division like a thunderclap to all. It is noteworthy that this round of organizational changes is particularly different from the organizational changes initiated by Ethereum founder Vitalik last year—this is a thorough personnel purge, also seen as 'the largest round of layoffs since EF's founding,' rather than previous partial leadership changes.

When the Ethereum Ecosystem Leader Chooses to Sever Its Tail to Survive: The Whole Story of EF's Major Layoffs

Everything begins with the official announcement "New EF Structure" formally released by EF on June 23.

In this lengthy article spanning thousands of words, EF differentiated the new organizational structure into protocol layer, access layer, user layer, community layer, and institutional layer. It subsequently stated that "this organizational restructuring involves laying off 54 people, accounting for 20% of EF's members." What's even more disheartening is the beginning of the announcement: "Through this process, we have gained the structure, activities, and personnel needed to execute the critical tasks we will soon face." In other words, the laid-off personnel and departments were eliminated, unnecessary, and without value.

It must be said that EF, which has always presented itself as a research organization and ecosystem leader with a scholarly demeanor, has for the first time revealed the cold side of its organizational management.

Schematic diagram of the new EF structure

The Dissolution of EF's Protocol Support Department Marks a Key Sign of EF's Organizational Split

It's worth mentioning that the work of EF's Protocol Support department leaned towards infrastructure construction, mainly responsible for coordinating the Ethereum protocol development process, including organizing and coordinating core developer meetings, tracking Ethereum network upgrades, supporting EIP advancement, and running the Ethereum protocol. Now, its main functions have been allocated to the protocol layer part of EF.

Coincidentally, on the same day EF announced its new structure, Ethlabs, a non-profit R&D lab co-founded by five former EF researchers, was officially announced. This organization aims to advance Ethereum as a settlement layer for the global economy and has received support from a series of investment institutions, Ethereum ecosystem projects, independent individuals, and EF foundation members, including Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin (Chairman of Sharplink, founder of Consensys), ETH treasury company BitMine (Tom Lee's Ethereum treasury company), Sharplink, and crypto investment firm SNZ.

ETHLabs Community Participant List (Source: Official Account)

On July 1st, Ethereum Institutional, co-founded by former EF members David Walsh, Marius Smith, and Matthew Dawson, was officially unveiled.

This organization's main concept is "the institutional finance application plan for Ethereum," dedicated to promoting the institutionalization and institutional-grade application of Ethereum, its secondary nodes, applications, and the entire ecosystem. The organization also emphasizes collaboration with Ethlabs, Etherealize, and the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance, taking charge of institutional demand connection and explaining Ethereum's value proposition to banks; Ethlabs focuses on translating related demands into technical products. As a non-profit independent institution, Ethereum Institutional will provide free Ethereum application-related consulting to banks and asset management companies.

A week later, Ethereum Institutional announced the start of core team recruitment. In the coming weeks, the focus will be on hiring roles such as Institutional Business Development (Institutional GTM), Marketing & Community Operations, as well as technical positions like Solution Architect and Technical Project Lead.

Thus, the EF layoff storm officially concluded with the emergence of two major non-profit independent organizations and the dissolution of the Protocol Support department, drawing an imperfect full stop to the "internal organizational transformation" personally promoted by Vitalik last year. Beyond organizational-level fragmentation and the loss of high-level talent like Executive Director Wang Xiaowei, EF also faces the impact of AI technology.

The Era of AI Offense and Defense Begins, EF Security Team Upgrades Testing

Yesterday, researchers from the EF Protocol Security Team stated in a blog post that they have deployed a series of AI agents to test software relied upon by the Ethereum ecosystem, searching for vulnerabilities in cryptographic systems, protocol code, and smart contracts.

The vulnerabilities discovered by the AI agents include a remotely triggerable panic issue in the libp2p gossipsub peer-to-peer layer used by Ethereum consensus clients. This issue has been fixed and disclosed on GitHub as CVE-2026-34219.

The researchers stated that the AI agents were organized into specialized roles such as reconnaissance, search, patching, and verification, used to find potential attack paths, reproduce failures, and verify their applicability to production code. EF stated that AI has not replaced security researchers but has changed the way they work, enabling the team to cover a far greater scope than manual review. However, it requires researchers to make more cautious judgments on a large number of seemingly credible conclusions.

Considering today's news of the official launch of the GPT-5.6 model, subsequent maintenance of Ethereum protocol security may be jointly handled by AI models and EF security researchers. Moreover, although EF now mentions "AI has not replaced researchers," with the continuous development and evolution of AI models, personnel within the EF security team and perhaps the entire organization may be further reduced in the future. In other words, EF will also face the test of AI models on its organizational structure and the execution of its own functions.

Summary: EF Organizational Transformation Reaches a Staged Conclusion, May Become an Ecosystem Mascot in the Future?

In January of last year, we provided a systematic analysis of EF's organizational transformation in the article "Vitalik Fires the First Shot of 'Reform,' Where is the Ethereum Foundation Headed?" Back then, Vitalik was ambitiously and forcefully pushing for EF organizational change. In May this year, after more than a year of organizational innovation, Vitalik's tune changed, stating that "the Ethereum Foundation should not be the center of the ETH ecosystem and will shift towards a smaller, long-termism route."

It must be said that after ETH has grown into an asset with a market cap in the hundreds of billions, EF, the official ecosystem organization founded nearly a decade ago, has also entered the awkward situation of being "a large ship hard to turn." No wonder Vitalik previously even remarked—"I will no longer write regular blog posts, I have decided to try writing some science fiction on the topic of decentralized governance."

As former EF researcher and Ethlabs member Ansgar Dietrichs said on a podcast earlier this month, "After five years of failing to break through $5,000, ETH still lacks a clear value narrative."

Currently, it seems that EF is already struggling to shoulder the banner of "revitalizing the Ethereum ecosystem and driving ETH price breakthroughs." Future large-scale adoption and institutional investment may have to rely on organizations like Ethlabs, Ethereum Institutional, and Etherealize.

Perhaps, in the near future, playing the role of an "ecosystem mascot" would be more suitable for EF.

Recommended Reading

Ethereum Enters a "Mid-Life Crisis," Analyzing Development Performance from a Data Perspective

Given: ETH = Nokia, Find: Ethereum = iOS?

Ethereum Is "Sick," Are These Three Remedies Appropriate?

Where Lies the Path? A Brief Analysis of the Three Major Abstract Problems Facing the Ethereum Ecosystem Today

Enumerating the Seven Deadly Sins of Ethereum, Who Can Play Its "Salvation Oratorio"?

Where Lies the Orthodoxy of Ethereum? A Detailed Explanation of the "Cryptocurrency Masterpiece" in Vitalik's Heart

Ethereum's Tenth Anniversary: Revisiting ETH's Change of Ownership Journey, The Resurgence of Token Centralization

Are L2s a Detour for Ethereum?

Bankless Founder Liquidates ETH Holdings, Collective Disillusionment with Ethereum Faith

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the major announcement regarding the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team, and why is it significant?

AThe Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team has officially disbanded. This is significant as it represents the largest round of layoffs in the EF's history, affecting 20% of its staff, and is seen as a major indicator of the organization's internal restructuring and fragmentation.

QWhat are two new non-profit independent organizations that emerged following the Ethereum Foundation's restructuring?

ATwo new non-profit independent organizations that emerged are Ethlabs, founded by five former EF researchers, and Ethereum Institutional, co-founded by former EF members. These organizations aim to take over functions related to R&D and institutional adoption of Ethereum, respectively.

QHow is the Ethereum Foundation's security team incorporating AI technology into its work?

AThe EF's security team has deployed a series of AI agents to test Ethereum's ecosystem software. These AI agents are organized into specialized roles to find potential attack paths, identify vulnerabilities (such as the CVE-2026-34219 issue), and verify fixes. The team states AI augments rather than replaces researchers, allowing them to cover much more ground.

QAccording to the article, what is one of the major criticisms faced by the Ethereum Foundation from within the community?

AOne major criticism from within the community is directed at the EF's perceived rigid structure, decision-making by a small group, questions about its organizational value, and its market-influencing ETH sell-offs. Bankless founder David Hoffman's public criticism and divestment from ETH is cited as an example of this discontent.

QWhat future role does the article suggest might be most suitable for the Ethereum Foundation?

AThe article suggests that, given its challenges in driving large-scale adoption and ETH price growth, the Ethereum Foundation's most suitable future role might be that of an 'ecological mascot' or a symbolic figurehead, while newer organizations lead practical development and institutional outreach.

Related Reads

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手1h ago

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手1h ago

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbit1h ago

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbit1h ago

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手1h ago

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片