Computing Power Crisis: Google Quietly Imposes Usage Caps on Meta for Gemini

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-29Last updated on 2026-06-29

Abstract

Google has quietly imposed usage caps on Meta's access to its Gemini AI models since around March due to surging demand overwhelming its computational infrastructure, according to a Financial Times report. The limits, which remain in place, have disrupted and delayed several of Meta's internal AI projects, forcing the social media giant to ration AI usage and improve efficiency. This reflects a broader industry-wide shortage of AI inference capacity, as companies deploy more chatbots and AI agents. Google CEO Sundar Pichai acknowledged compute constraints are limiting cloud revenue growth. In response, Google recently signed a $920 million monthly compute leasing deal with SpaceX to expand capacity. The restrictions have accelerated Meta's shift toward its own AI models, such as Muse Spark, to reduce dependence on external providers like Google. While other Google clients also face limits, Meta's vast scale made it particularly affected. The situation highlights how the AI infrastructure bottleneck has shifted from model training to inference, requiring massive new capital investments to resolve.

Written by: Xu Chao

The supply-demand contradiction in artificial intelligence infrastructure is intensifying among the world's leading technology companies. According to informed sources, Google informed Meta around March this year that it could not meet its full Gemini computing power demands and imposed usage caps on the social media giant—even the world's largest AI service provider is struggling to cope with the surging demand for computing power.

According to a report by the Financial Times, the restrictions remain in effect and have already caused disruptions and delays to several internal AI projects at Meta. As a result, Meta has instructed employees to improve the efficiency of their AI computing power usage, promoting a more meticulous accounting of AI tokens internally. Both Google and Meta declined to comment on the matter.

This situation has forced Google to accelerate its expansion efforts. Earlier this month, Google signed a computing power leasing agreement with Elon Musk's SpaceX worth $920 million per month. Google CEO Sundar Pichai admitted during the Q1 earnings call: "We are indeed facing constraints in computing power recently; if we could meet the demand, cloud business revenue would be higher."

Meta is not alone. Multiple sources pointed out that other Google enterprise customers are also subject to varying degrees of restrictions, with Meta being the most affected due to its exceptionally large demand. This incident highlights the explosive growth of AI inference workloads, which has become one of the industry's biggest challenges.

Computing Power Bottleneck Under Persistent Pressure, Major Clients Bear the Brunt

Despite hundreds of billions of dollars invested by major tech companies in chips, data centers, and power supply, AI computing power supply still struggles to keep pace with demand growth.

Google's Q1 cloud business revenue surpassed $20 billion for the first time, and its backlog of signed but undelivered cloud contracts nearly doubled sequentially, exceeding $460 billion. Pichai clearly stated that computing power constraints will persist in the near term.

Against this backdrop, the impact on Meta is particularly pronounced. Sources indicate that it is the high-intensity demand from major enterprise clients like Meta that directly pushed Google to accelerate its search for external computing power sources. As enterprises deploy chatbots, coding assistants, and AI agents on a large scale, inference workloads—the computing power consumed when models perform tasks in real-world applications after training—are becoming a core bottleneck for the industry.

Meta's Internal Projects Hindered, Accelerates Shift to In-House Models

Meta uses Gemini extensively internally, covering platform security review (including identifying fraudulent content and removing harmful information), customer service and advertising-assisted chatbots, as well as some internal workflows and code development, while also using other models like Anthropic's Claude.

According to sources, Meta initially chose Gemini because its performance surpassed that of the company's own open-source Llama model. However, as computing power restrictions tightened, Meta is accelerating its migration to in-house models. Multiple sources stated that Meta has recently begun prioritizing the promotion of its newly launched Muse Spark model, which is believed to be competitive with Gemini in performance, helping to reduce reliance on external models.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has previously continued to increase investment in AI talent and infrastructure, aiming to build what he calls "personal super intelligence." Unlike Google, Meta does not have a cloud business and is accelerating the construction of its own data center system, pledging a cumulative investment of $600 billion in the United States by 2028.

Google Expands Capacity via SpaceX, Industry Seeks Solutions

Faced with computing power pressure, Google signed a $920 million per month computing power leasing agreement with SpaceX this month to bridge the infrastructure gap. AI lab Anthropic also reached a similar agreement with SpaceX last month.

Google's move to impose restrictions on Meta provides a rare window for the outside world to glimpse the real pressure faced by the world's top AI service providers in allocating computing power. Currently, the infrastructure bottleneck across the entire AI industry is spreading from the training side to the inference side. Resolving the supply-demand contradiction still depends on the realization of a new round of large-scale capital investment.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what limitation did Google impose on Meta regarding Gemini usage?

AGoogle reportedly informed Meta around March that it could not meet all of Meta's Gemini computing power demands and imposed usage limits on the AI model for the social media giant.

QWhat consequence did the reported Gemini usage limit have on Meta's internal operations?

AThe limitation has interfered with and delayed several of Meta's internal AI projects, leading the company to instruct employees to be more efficient with AI computing power and to carefully manage their use of AI tokens.

QWhich company did Google recently sign a major compute rental agreement with to address its capacity constraints?

AGoogle recently signed a compute rental agreement with Elon Musk's SpaceX, worth $920 million per month, to help expand its infrastructure capacity.

QHow is Meta responding to the challenges posed by the reliance on external AI models like Gemini?

AMeta is accelerating its shift towards its own self-developed models. It is prioritizing the promotion of its new Muse Spark model, which is considered competitive with Gemini, to reduce dependency on external providers.

QWhat does the article highlight as a major industry-wide bottleneck that is shifting from one area to another?

AThe article states that the infrastructure bottleneck in the AI industry is shifting from the training side to the inference side, as explosive growth in AI inference workloads becomes a core challenge for the sector.

Related Reads

The Verdict in Choi Tae-won's Divorce Case: Revealing the Inheritance Undercurrent Behind SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire

SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won's high-profile divorce case, involving a record 1.38 trillion won settlement, has drawn attention to the succession plans for Korea's second-largest conglomerate, especially its crown jewel, SK hynix. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts centered on the eldest son, Chey's three children from his marriage to former President Roh Tae-woo's daughter, Roh Soh-yeong, are carving distinct, non-traditional paths. Eldest daughter Chey Yun-jung (b. 1989) is seen as the most evident successor. With a scientific and consulting background, she holds executive roles at SK bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth support department, focusing on future strategy and biopharma. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional business alliance. Second daughter Chey Min-jung (b. 1991) took a unique route, voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including an anti-piracy deployment. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting her to U.S. defense and policy circles—networks crucial for a global semiconductor giant. The only son, Chey In-geun (b. 1995), who studied physics like his father, worked briefly at SK E&S before joining McKinsey. Despite fitting the traditional "heir" profile as the eldest son, he remains silent and holds no public position or shares in SK, suggesting the old succession playbook is obsolete. As SK hynix's valuation soars, becoming a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the heirs' legitimacy is no longer automatic. They must prove themselves in fields like AI biotech, global policy, and strategic consulting. Their marriages also reflect new elite networks in tech and defense, not old political alliances. Their inheritance is the complex challenge of navigating a globalized, tech-driven world, not just a corporate throne.

marsbit1h ago

The Verdict in Choi Tae-won's Divorce Case: Revealing the Inheritance Undercurrent Behind SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire

marsbit1h ago

From OpenSea to OpenRouter: Is Alex Atallah Repeating His 'Exit at the Peak' Playbook?

From OpenSea to OpenRouter: Is Alex Atallah Repeating His "Exit at the Peak" Playbook? According to the Wall Street Journal, payments giant Stripe is in talks to acquire the AI model aggregation platform OpenRouter in a potential deal valuing the company near $100 billion. This would mark founder Alex Atallah's second creation of a company reaching a $100 billion valuation, following his co-founding of NFT marketplace OpenSea. OpenRouter, founded just over three years ago, has grown rapidly by acting as a unified gateway for developers to access over 400 AI models. It currently has about 10 million users and processes over 200 trillion tokens monthly. While the platform's annualized revenue is around $50 million, its valuation has skyrocketed from $1.3 billion in March 2026. The potential acquisition by Stripe, a company OpenRouter's founder once likened it to, represents a major expansion into AI infrastructure for the payments leader. This move echoes Atallah's previous timing with OpenSea, where he departed before the NFT market's significant downturn. For OpenRouter, selling now may be strategic. Despite its scale, its business model—charging a 5-5.5% fee on AI inference calls—faces pressure from competition, open-source models, and potential price wars among model providers, limiting its profitability narrative for an IPO. A key asset for potential acquirers like Stripe is OpenRouter's vast repository of real-world AI usage data, which offers unique insights into model performance and developer preferences that are difficult to replicate. Whether this potential deal signifies a new valuation benchmark for AI infrastructure or another market peak signal remains to be seen.

链捕手2h ago

From OpenSea to OpenRouter: Is Alex Atallah Repeating His 'Exit at the Peak' Playbook?

链捕手2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片