409mln SOL staked and counting – Is market missing Solana’s signal?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-25Last updated on 2025-12-25

Abstract

Solana's fundamentals show mixed signals despite a record-high 409 million SOL staked, enhancing network security. However, decentralization concerns arise as validator numbers dropped 68% (from 2,500 to 800) due to the Solana Foundation cutting subsidies. Real-World Asset (RWA) activity is strong, with over 115K holders—close to Ethereum's count—but net flows lag significantly behind competitors. Solana attracted $216 million in Q4 2025, while Ethereum and BNB Chain each exceeded $1 billion. Despite these developments, SOL's price has fallen 58% to $121, indicating a disconnect from on-chain growth.

Solana fundamentals remain strong despite the weak price action of SOL. The network recently reached a new all-time high of 409 million SOL staked supply.

This meant the chain’s security increased, but whether decentralization also improved was the big question.

Solana validator crisis

In a move to ensure sustainable staking economics, the Solana Foundation cut off subsidies that were previously offered to some validators (entities tasked with proposing blocks on the network).

So far, the Solana Foundation has reduced its delegated Solana [SOL] from 85 million SOL to 23 million SOL delegated to small validators.

While a necessary step, the Foundation’s move has also forced most small validators to leave the staking space. Solana network validators have decreased by 68% from 2,500 to 800, prompting some to flag it as a decentralisation risk if the trend continues.

For comparison, Ethereum [ETH] has nearly 1 million validators or 1,250 times more validators securing its network.

Solana RWA traction spikes

That said, network activity is also increasing in response to the real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. The number of RWA holders across the Solana ecosystem reached a record level of over 115K, a 11% surge in the past 30 days despite a broader market lull.

This meant a rising demand for tokenised assets, such as on-chain stocks, credits, and money markets, among others.

However, based on RWA net flows, Solana has lagged behind other chains. In Q4 2025, Solana attracted $216 million in net flows. In contrast, competitors like BNB Chain [BNB] and Ethereum each attracted +1 billion in inflows, suggesting a six times outperformance.

Surprisingly, Solana RWA users were close to Ethereum’s 138K holders but way higher than BNB Chain’s 8K holders, but lagged behind in net flows. This meant BNB Chain RWA users were big players, hence capable of moving large flows despite having a relatively small number of holders.

Nevertheless, SOL’s price was not reflecting the improving network fundamentals mentioned above. The token’s price has dropped by 58% and traded at $121 at the time of writing.


Final Thoughts

  • Solana’s staked supply and RWA activity reached record highs in 2025.
  • However, validators have dropped by 68% and SOL’s price also tanked by 58%.

Related Questions

QWhat new milestone did Solana recently achieve in terms of staking, and what does it imply for the network?

ASolana recently reached a new all-time high of 409 million SOL staked, which significantly increased the chain's security.

QWhy did the number of Solana validators drop by 68%, and what concern does this raise?

AThe number of validators dropped from 2,500 to 800 because the Solana Foundation cut off subsidies that were previously offered to small validators. This has raised concerns about a potential decentralization risk for the network.

QHow does Solana's validator count compare to Ethereum's?

AEthereum has nearly 1 million validators, which is 1,250 times more than the approximately 800 validators currently on Solana.

QDespite a market lull, what positive on-chain activity was recorded on Solana, and what does it indicate?

AThe number of Real-World Asset (RWA) holders on Solana reached a record level of over 115,000, an 11% surge in the past 30 days. This indicates a rising demand for tokenized assets like on-chain stocks and money markets.

QHow did Solana's RWA net flows in Q4 2025 compare to its competitors, and what does the data suggest about its users?

AIn Q4 2025, Solana attracted $216 million in RWA net flows, which lagged far behind competitors like BNB Chain and Ethereum, each of which attracted over $1 billion. This suggests that while Solana has a large number of RWA holders, BNB Chain's fewer users are 'big players' capable of moving larger volumes of capital.

Related Reads

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit5m ago

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit5m ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit59m ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit59m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片