Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) Bergerak: Dapatkah Kenaikan 6% Ini Memicu Tren Lebih Besar?

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-25Last updated on 2026-03-25

Abstract

Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) meluncurkan Pengu Card berbasis jaringan Visa, bekerja sama dengan KAST. Kartu ini dapat digunakan di lebih dari 170 negara dan 150 juta merchant, dengan imbalan hingga 12% untuk pemegang kartu. Token PENGU mengalami kenaikan 6,76%, diperdagangkan di sekitar $0,007460 dengan volume perdagangan harian naik 19,22%. Analisis teknis menunjukkan potensi kenaikan menuju $0,007658 jika momentum bullish berlanjut, atau penurunan ke $0,007240 jika tekanan bearish terjadi. Indikator MACD menunjukkan awal momentum bullish, sementara CMF di level 0,07 mengindikasikan tekanan belan yang stabil. RSI di 66,01 menunjukkan kecenderungan bullish yang kuat, meski mendekati zona overbought.

Pudgy Penguins telah meluncurkan Pengu Card berbasis jaringan Visa, bekerja sama dengan KAST. Kartu ini dapat digunakan di lebih dari 170 negara di seluruh dunia dan di lebih dari 150 juta merchant. Dengan Pengu Card, pembayaran dapat dilakukan, dan pemegang kartu dapat menerima reward hingga 12%.

Sementara itu, token PENGU naik 6,76%, diperdagangkan pada level $0,007460 pada saat penulisan. Kapitalisasi pasar berada di sekitar $468,93 juta, dan volume perdagangan harian Pudgy Penguins telah meningkat lebih dari 19,22%, mencapai kisaran $102,6 juta.

Seiring dengan intensifikasi impuls bullish dalam jendela perdagangan empat jam, harga Pudgy Penguins dapat naik ke level resistance $0,007658. Jika tekanan kenaikan bertahan dan menjadi kuat, golden cross mungkin terjadi dan mengirim harga ke arah $0,007839 atau bahkan lebih tinggi.

Dengan asumsi PENGU memulai pergerakan ke sisi bawah, harga mungkin tergelincir ke kisaran support di $0,007240. Dengan koreksi bearish yang berkepanjangan, death cross akan terbuka, yang dapat mendorong harga aset ke low sebelumnya, di bawah tanda $0,007002.

Outlook Teknis Pudgy Penguins: Sinyal Bullish atau Bearish?

Garis Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) dari PENGU berada di atas garis nol, tetapi garis sinyal masih di bawahnya, yang menunjukkan bahwa momentum bullish awal sedang terbentuk. Tren berubah ke atas, dan jika ini berlanjut, itu akan mengembangkan pergerakan bullish yang lebih kuat.

Selain itu, indikator Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) Pudgy Penguins yang berada di 0,07 menunjukkan tekanan pembelian yang ringan. Ada aliran uang yang stabil, tetapi tidak agresif, dengan akumulasi yang tenang. Perlu dicatat, ini menunjukkan bias naik yang sedikit, selama inflow itu berlanjut.

Pembacaan Bull-Bear Power (BBP) PENGU sebesar 0,000508 hampir datar, dengan perbedaan yang sangat kecil antara pembeli dan penjual saat ini—tidak ada kekuatan di kedua sisi. Pasar belum memutuskan, menunjuk ke pergerakan sideways, kecuali momentum mulai terbangun.

Selain itu, Relative Strength Index (RSI) harian yang berada di 66,01 menyimpulkan bahwa pasar sangat condong ke bullish. Pembeli mengendalikan, dan harga telah bergerak naik. Ini mungkin mendekati zona overbought, dan jika naik lebih jauh, mungkin menjadi stretched.

Berita Crypto Terkini Teratas

Solana (SOL) di Tepi: Membangun Kekuatan atau Menunjukkan Tanda Kelemahan?

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit1m ago

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit1m ago

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit12m ago

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit12m ago

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit25m ago

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit25m ago

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

On June 12th, SpaceX debuted on the Nasdaq, reaching a valuation that briefly touched $2 trillion. This marked the culmination of a 24-year journey from its founding in 2002, driven by Elon Musk's frustration at the high cost of buying rockets. The company's path was defined by early failures, with its first three Falcon 1 launches ending in explosions before a successful 2008 flight opened the era of commercial spaceflight. Key to its model was a fixed-price NASA contract, incentivizing cost reduction. SpaceX mastered rocket reusability, first achieving a Falcon 9 landing in 2015, which drastically cut launch costs. This enabled its profitable Starlink satellite internet constellation, envisioned years before reusability was proven, to create an internal market for frequent launches. Similarly, the next-generation Starship rocket was in development long before its first flight, with its business case evolving from Mars colonization to supporting the emerging concept of in-orbit data centers for AI—a story now central to its valuation. The company's recent IPO, a reversal of its long-standing "no IPO" stance, is funding this ambitious "space-based compute" vision. While major tech players like Google, Blue Origin, and others are investing heavily, significant technical and cost hurdles remain. Ultimately, SpaceX's history is one of creating its own demand: first with Starlink and now with space-based AI compute, betting that its next rocket will enable its next giant market.

marsbit28m ago

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

marsbit28m ago

USDe Circumvents GENIUS Act Yield Ban: How Synthetic Dollars Became Crypto's Most Successful Gray Area?

In drafting the GENIUS Act, Congress prohibited licensed payment stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield to holders—a rule that forced changes for USDC. However, Ethena's USDe, a rapidly growing "yield dollar," operates outside this regulation. USDe is a delta-neutral synthetic dollar backed by crypto collateral and hedged perpetual futures positions, generating yield from funding rates rather than traditional reserves. Because it doesn't fit the legal definition of a payment stablecoin, the GENIUS Act's restrictions do not apply. USDe's supply peaked above $14 billion in 2025, making it a top-three dollar-denominated crypto asset. Its model carries distinct risks, notably dependence on sustained positive funding rates and vulnerability during market deleveraging events, as seen in a brief depeg in October 2025. Regulatory approaches differ: Germany's BaFin banned USDe sales, viewing it as an unregistered security, while U.S. institutional capital, like Janus Henderson, has embraced it for treasury management. The GENIUS Act defined and regulated payment stablecoins but left synthetic dollars like USDe in a gray area. The unresolved question is whether future regulations will address this category or if yield will continue migrating to undefined spaces.

marsbit30m ago

USDe Circumvents GENIUS Act Yield Ban: How Synthetic Dollars Became Crypto's Most Successful Gray Area?

marsbit30m ago

Trading

Spot

Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy PENGU

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Pudgy Penguins (PENGU)After purchasing your Pudgy Penguins (PENGU), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Pudgy Penguins (PENGU)Easily trade Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

4.6k Total ViewsPublished 2024.12.23Updated 2026.06.02

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of PENGU (PENGU) are presented below.