NFTs Enter A New Era As Solana Closes The Gap With Ethereum

BitcoinistPublished on 2022-07-08Last updated on 2022-07-08

Abstract

NFTs on both the Ethereum and Solana chains have been gaining popularity over the past year. The trading of jpegs...

NFTs on both the Ethereum and Solana chains have been gaining popularity over the past year. The trading of jpegs on the blockchain was the new shiny thing that had quickly gained acceptance from investors all over the place. This brought millions of users into both chains. However, as time has gone on, competition has grown fierce between Ethereum and Solana, which remain the two largest NFT blockchains in the space.
Solana Closing The Gap
The rise of Solana NFTs is nothing short of impressive over the last couple of months. It has now wormed its way up to become the top contender for Ethereum. What this also means was that supporters of both networks have been locked in a battle of sorts when it comes to NFT dominance. The rise in Solana NFTs has seen the network clinch more market share from its larger counterpart.
Solana remains behind Ethereum when it comes to NFT volume but the gap has become smaller over time. This is evidenced by the periods of times when the trading volume on Solana has managed to outpace that of Ethereum. One of these instances was the May 24 trading day. The total SOL NFT volume had surpassed that of ETH amid much fanfare. Most of these happening on Magic Eden, Solana’s leading NFT marketplace.

Solana vs Ethereum on NFTs


SOL closing in on ETH | Source: Arcane Research
It is also evident in the number of addresses that are active on the addresses. While that of Ethereum had been declining, Solana has been surging ahead. For the month of June, Solana’s daily active addresses had been 250% more than that recorded on the Ethereum blockchain.
Ethereum Having A Hard Time With NFTs
Ethereum still remains the preferred blockchain for most when it comes to trading NFTs but there are a number of factors that is making this a harder choice by the day. Currently, the transaction fees on Ethereum are down. However, it remains much higher compared to those of competitor Solana.
While the average transaction fee last month came out to $6.5 on Ethereum, Solana users were only having to pay a few cents per transaction. This cheaper alternative has been one of the drivers of the increased SOL adoption.

Nevertheless, Ethereum continues to dominate the market even as NFT volume has declined. Solana has had a good run these couple of months, but although it has closed the gap a bit more, it still remains behind Ethereum by a large margin.
NFT trading volume on Ethereum for the month of June had been 350% higher than Solana and this is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. However, the NFT space has followed the bear market trend. So lower values overall are expected in terms of volume going forward.

Related Reads

Focus: Five Leading AI Stocks on Nasdaq

The report analyzes five Nasdaq-listed AI infrastructure stocks—Micron (MU), MaxLinear (MXL), AMD, Lumentum (LITE), and Vicor (VICR)—as distinct plays within the AI capital expenditure chain, rather than a single "AI trade." While all benefit from AI data center spending, they differ in their specific roles (e.g., memory, computing, optics, power, connectivity), financial resilience, and risk profiles. The author argues that the key question is not whether the AI narrative remains intact, but whether capital expenditure translates into real orders, earnings justify valuations, and portfolios can withstand high volatility. Historical data shows these stocks have significantly outperformed benchmarks but also experienced deeper drawdowns (~28% to -32%), highlighting their high-beta, high-volatility nature. An investment framework is proposed: core positions (e.g., MU, AMD) for stocks with stronger fundamental evidence; satellite positions (e.g., LITE, VICR) for high-potential, high-volatility names; and cautious observation (e.g., MXL) for smaller-cap ideas with unproven financials. The emphasis is on disciplined, phased buying during pullbacks—only when price corrections align with intact fundamentals and available risk budget—rather than emotional "buy-the-dip" strategies. Overall, AI infrastructure offers long-term potential, but success requires strict position sizing, role definition for each holding, and preparedness for significant volatility.

marsbit59m ago

Focus: Five Leading AI Stocks on Nasdaq

marsbit59m ago

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Will Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

TL;DR: - According to reports, Standard Chartered Bank has published a research report on Uniswap, setting a 2030 price target of $100 for the UNI token. - The bank's core logic is that the tokenization of assets will drive demand for open DeFi liquidity, and Uniswap could capture significant trading volume and fee revenue. - However, most institutional-grade tokenized products are permissioned, and the example of BlackRock's BUIDL shows that DeFi still faces significant access barriers. Standard Chartered's $100 target for UNI by 2030 is based on the hypothesis that tokenized assets will grow massively and a significant portion will flow into open DeFi markets, requiring decentralized exchange platforms like Uniswap for liquidity. The bank forecasts tokenized assets could reach $4 trillion by 2028, with up to 30% in DeFi by 2030. The key question is whether tokenized assets like treasuries and funds will trade in open, decentralized markets or remain within closed, permissioned institutional systems. This directly impacts Uniswap's potential growth. A real-world example is BlackRock's BUIDL fund, which, while using UniswapX for trading, is strictly limited to pre-approved, whitelisted institutional participants. This highlights the current trend: institutions may leverage DeFi infrastructure but maintain strict control over access and transfers. Furthermore, for UNI's value to rise significantly, Uniswap must establish a clear value-capture mechanism, such as the approved fee switch and token burn proposal. Regulatory and interoperability hurdles also persist, as noted by bodies like the Financial Stability Board. In summary, Standard Chartered's bold prediction hinges on the future flow of tokenized asset liquidity. While it signals institutional recognition of DeFi's potential, the path to $100 depends on overcoming current permissioned models and enabling truly open, cross-asset liquidity pools on platforms like Uniswap.

Foresight News1h ago

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Will Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

Foresight News1h ago

Odaily Editorial Team Tea Talk (June 17)

Odaily Editorial Team Casual Chat (June 17) This is an informal column sharing real-time thoughts from Odaily's editorial team on industry news, data, and events. The content is based on actual investment and observations, does not constitute investment advice, and aims to expand perspectives. Azuma shared recent operations: small-scale buys in crypto (mainly BTC) at relatively high levels, a small addition to HOOD stock, and participation in World Cup prediction markets. He also discussed Hyperliquid, noting that while its token HYPE has performed well, its high price may hinder the expansion of its HIP-3 ecosystem by making market creation cost-prohibitive, potentially limiting the platform to just one major market (trade.xyz). Suzz emphasized the importance of a calm mindset in investing, stating that markets offer perpetual opportunities. He warned against "hindsight bias," where past opportunities seem obvious, and stressed that the present always holds new chances for those with the right knowledge and temperament. Golem analyzed SpaceX's acquisition of AI tool Cursor's parent company, Anysphere, for $60 billion paid entirely in SpaceX stock. He speculated whether Musk's interests might work to keep SpaceX's trading volume and market cap high in the short term to reduce the actual equity cost of the deal, noting current high retail investor enthusiasm. Wenser shared a market outlook: cautiously bullish on BTC, monitoring SpaceX stock post-IPO for a potential rise, observing World Cup trends favoring strong teams, and noting the continued strength of Japanese and Korean stocks. He highlighted Anthropic's potential for a massive future IPO and the defensive investment logic in "picks and shovels" AI infrastructure. Qin Xiaofeng discussed trading HYPE around $56-$70, viewing the $50-$60 range as long-term support due to Hyperliquid's dominance in on-chain traditional asset trading and its substantial fee revenue used to buy back HYPE. On ETH, he noted a divide between disappointed crypto natives and bullish traditional investors like Tom Lee, personally viewing current ETH prices as undervalued.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Odaily Editorial Team Tea Talk (June 17)

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片