ETHFi faces sharp 9% drop – User activity, liquidity, and income plunge

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-10-20Last updated on 2025-10-21

Key Takeaways

What caused ETHFi’s recent 9% decline?

The drop followed a $98K plunge in fees and a massive liquidity drawdown to $680K.

How severe is ETHFi’s on-chain slowdown?

Daily active users dropped to 328, the lowest since July, while TVL fell to $9.92B, reflecting a deep investor exit.


EtherFi [ETHFi] has seen one of its steepest outflows in the past day, recording a 9% drop.

AMBCrypto traced this decline to weakening on-chain performance across the market. The effects are gradually surfacing, and a further drop could follow.

These factors will likely shape ETHFi’s price dynamics in the coming days.

Users churn at the helm

The decline in ETHFi’s performance stems largely from a sustained exit of users from the platform. According to recent data from Artemis, transaction users have fallen to levels last seen in July 2025.

Currently, only 328 on-chain users interact with the protocol—a clear sign that investor sentiment has weakened. This trend has directly impacted the protocol’s revenue, with fees generated plummeting sharply.

EtherFi - Daily Active Addresses

Source: Artemis

To put this in context, fees dropped from $210,500 to $111,700 in just one day, reflecting a loss of about $98,000 that could have contributed to protocol earnings.

Declining protocol usage, however, isn’t the only challenge facing ETHFi. AMBCrypto’s analysis found other factors contributing to rising sell pressure and reduced liquidity.

Sell-offs heighten amid liquidity crunch

Market data shows a notable sell-off as investors continue to reduce exposure to ETHFi. Liquidity within the staking protocol has dropped to its lowest level this year.

According to DeFiLlama, the total available on-chain liquidity for ETHFi now stands at roughly $680,000.

This suggests that the amount of ETHFi locked in decentralized exchanges (DEXs) like Uniswap [UNI] has declined sharply.

EtherFi TVL and Liquidity chart.

Source: DeFiLlama

The fall indicates waning long-term conviction, as investors are offloading tokens to avoid further losses amid worsening market conditions.

Similarly, the total value locked (TVL) across ETHFi protocols has also plunged, currently standing at $9.92 billion.

This pattern mirrors the liquidity decline, signaling that investors remain cautious and risk-averse.

Protocol performance stays weak

ETHFi’s overall protocol performance continues to reflect the bearish outlook in the market.

Reports show that Net Holder Income (NHI) for the fourth quarter stands at just $464,000—a steep drop from $3.9 million recorded in the third quarter.

At the time, ETHFi generated about $1.3 million monthly or $650,000 bi-weekly.

The figures show the protocol has failed to match its earlier performance, suggesting that ETHFi holders will likely receive less income in October.

EtherFi net Holder income chart.

Source: DeFiLlama

This decline adds to the already low incentive to hold the asset, further straining investor confidence in the short term.

Share

Related Reads

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

The article discusses the ongoing challenge of defining and achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). It notes that industry leaders have set vague, often profit- or time-based benchmarks for AGI, while the concept itself lacks a consensus definition—a situation the article compares to a "Rorschach test." It highlights a recent 2025 paper by researcher Michael Timothy Bennett, who proposes a new, measurable definition. Bennett frames AGI not as mimicking human performance on tests, which current large language models (LLMs) have already mastered, but as an "artificial scientist." A true AGI, according to this view, should be able to widely and efficiently adapt to new environments and tasks within real-world constraints (like computational and energy limits), focusing on the *discovery of new knowledge* rather than the replication of existing data. The author contrasts this with the current dominant approach of "scale-maxing"—massively scaling up data, parameters, and compute. While powerful, this method leads to models that fail on out-of-distribution problems and lack core intelligent abilities: they are passive learners, cannot reason causally, and cannot actively experiment or balance exploration with exploitation. The article argues that Bennett's framework offers a crucial shift. It makes AGI a quantifiable engineering problem and proposes new evaluation "adaptation benchmarks" that test an AI's ability to actively learn in novel scenarios. The conclusion is that achieving AGI will require a fundamental reset—a fusion of multiple methodologies beyond simple scaling, moving AI from mimicking patterns to embodying the scientific spirit of inquiry and discovery.

marsbit53m ago

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

marsbit53m ago

Pope Issues First AI Encyclical: 40,000 Words, 10 Key Points, Clarifying AI Anxiety

Pope Leo XIV's historic encyclical "Magnifica Humanitas," released in May 2026, marks the Catholic Church's first major document addressing artificial intelligence. The 40,000-word text moves beyond theological abstraction to confront practical AI anxieties affecting society. It argues that AI is no longer a mere tool but an embedded environment influencing daily decisions in areas like employment, healthcare, justice, and information, often without users' awareness. The encyclical presents ten core concerns. It highlights that the central issue isn't just regulation, but who holds the underlying *power*—control over data, compute, and platforms—often concentrated in private entities. It warns that even developers cannot fully explain AI systems, creating accountability gaps. While AI can simulate human interaction and creativity, it cautions against treating it as a moral agent capable of bearing true responsibility or forming genuine relationships. Key risks identified include AI's role in opaque decision-making for jobs or welfare, the amplification of persuasive disinformation, and the potential for education to focus on tool use over critical thinking. The document stresses that work has value beyond efficiency, and AI should enhance human capabilities, not merely replace roles. It firmly states that irreversible decisions, especially involving life and death, must remain under human judgment. Ultimately, the encyclical frames AI's challenge as anthropological, not just technological. As AI simulates uniquely human capacities like judgment and creation, it forces a re-examination of what makes human action meaningful: our capacity for responsibility, vulnerability, and bearing real consequences. The Pope concludes that technology is never neutral; its development and deployment are shaped by human values and choices, making an inclusive, ethically grounded dialogue essential for its future.

marsbit58m ago

Pope Issues First AI Encyclical: 40,000 Words, 10 Key Points, Clarifying AI Anxiety

marsbit58m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片