Ethereum drops 7% in massive sell-off, but will USDT save ETH?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-09-22Last updated on 2025-09-23

Key Takeaways

How did the market shakeout hit Ethereum?

Ethereum dumped 7% on the week vs. Bitcoin’s smaller move. Meanwhile, Tether’s $1 billion USDT injection could fuel a dip buy or another squeeze.

What’s BitMine’s strategy amid this volatility?

BitMine added 264k ETH (over 2% of the network) and raised $1.28 billion via shares and warrants to bulk up its ETH stack.


The 22nd of September delivered a brutal gut check for the crypto market. 

With $1.65 billion in longs liquidated, the market logged the largest deleveraging flush of 2025. Bitcoin [BTC] accounted for $263.4 million of that, with longs dominating 93.7% of the blow-ups.

Ethereum [ETH], however, took the brunt of the hit, seeing $375 million in total liquidations. The fallout? ETH dumped 7% on the week (roughly 3x BTC’s move) while the ETH/BTC ratio hit the month’s steepest dip.

ETHETH

Source: TradingView (ETH/BTC)

Against this backdrop, Tether injected a fresh $1 billion USDT on Ethereum.

Strategically, the timing couldn’t have been better. The leverage unwind drained $180 billion across crypto, with ETH bleeding $44 billion. In this setup, fresh liquidity could either catch the dip or trigger another squeeze.

Historically, when Ethereum dumps harder than Bitcoin, it often snaps back stronger. Could this fresh liquidity be setting up the same move, with risk-on flows rotating back into ETH while BTC trails?

BitMine bets big on Ethereum amid market shakeout

Ethereum’s meltdown didn’t spare BitMine [NASDAQ: BMNR].

After two weeks of steady inflows pumping the stock 42% to $64, BMNR kicked off the last week of September with a 10.1% pullback, almost half of ETH’s 5.4% dip in the same stretch. Still, conviction hasn’t wavered.

In its latest filing, BitMine stacked an extra 264,378 ETH, taking its stash to 2.416 million ETH. Technically, that’s over 2% of the Ethereum network, with the company creeping toward its 5% supply target of 6 million ETH.

BMNR EthereumBMNR Ethereum

Source: The Block

But the main play was all about BitMine’s long game.

On Monday, they rolled out a $365 million share raise at $70, plus warrants that could pull in another $913 million. That’s a total of $1.28 billion in fresh ammo to bulk up their ETH stack, reinforcing Ethereum’s bid wall.

In this setup, ETH’s recent liquidity squeeze feels like a clean reset, giving buyers a shot at the dip. With Ethereum still delivering 60%+ quarterly ROI, its risk-reward profile still looks solid for a bullish Q4.

Share

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit2h ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit2h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手4h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片