NEAR’s price surges – But will sell-offs derail its rally?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-09-19Last updated on 2025-09-20

Key Takeaways

What is driving NEAR Protocol’s recent market performance?

NEAR’s recent surge is largely driven by a $19.52 million increase in its total value locked (TVL) and rising decentralized exchange (DEX) trading volume.

How are NEAR’s spot and on-chain activities impacting its price?

While on-chain activities show bullish momentum, the rising spot sell-off suggests a bearish trend, potentially weighing on NEAR’s price outlook.


NEAR Protocol [NEAR] led the market in gains after recording a massive liquidity inflow, largely driven by on-chain users.

Market sentiment continues to indicate the possibility of a further rally, but the spot segment of the market has failed to align with this move and continues to see further price decline.

On-chain volume rises

Trading activities on-chain have been at their highest in the past day.

According to DeFiLlama, there has been a simultaneous surge in the Total Value Locked (TVL) of NEAR Protocol alongside its decentralized exchange (DEX) trading volume.

From the 7th of September to press time, the TVL in NEAR rose from $91.71 million to a new peak of $111.23 million. 

This $19.52 million increase highlights a notable uptick in the amount of NEAR tokens staked during that period.

NEAR total value lockedNEAR total value locked

Source: DeFiLlama

The DEX volume also recorded notable growth, rising to a new high of $62.35 million, the highest level since the 23rd of August.

This implies that more trading activities have been ongoing in the market. In the past two weeks, NEAR has gained 17%, confirming ongoing accumulation within this period.

Technical indicators support trend

The bullish momentum in the market is supported by technical indicators such as the Average Directional Index (ADX) and the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF).

At press time, the CMF has seen a major climb to 0.26 in the past day. Typically, when the CMF is positive and trending upward, it confirms that the market is dominated by buyers and that trading volume remains high.

CMF, ADX technical indicator.CMF, ADX technical indicator.

Source: TradingView

The same sentiment is mirrored by the ADX, which measures whether a trend is strong or weak.

When the ADX trends upward alongside price, it confirms that the trend is highly bullish. This is the case with NEAR, as both price and ADX have been moving in parallel.

The growing bullish sentiment continues to strengthen the overall price outlook and supports the possibility of NEAR’s next upward move.

Spot offload strongly

Despite these gains in the market, there has been a notable surge in the amount of NEAR sold on exchanges.

In the past 48 hours, the amount of NEAR offloaded on spot markets has risen significantly.

On the 18th of September, investors sold $6.94 million worth of NEAR, and the latest data today shows that the sell-off reached $2.90 million.

NEAR spot exchange NetflowNEAR spot exchange Netflow

Source: CoinGlass

This brings the total 48-hour sell-off to $9.64 million. Typically, a one-day sell-off implies traders are likely taking profit, but two consecutive days of strong sell-offs suggest the emergence of a bearish trend.

If the bearish spot sell-off continues, it could weigh heavily on NEAR’s price outlook. However, counter inflows from on-chain investors may still reflect positively on price movement.

Share

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

An article compares the core architectural philosophies of WeChat and Telegram, highlighting fundamental differences in data storage, monetization, and developer ecosystems. **Data Storage:** Telegram offers unlimited, synchronized cloud storage for seamless access across all devices. In contrast, WeChat stores chat history locally on each device, requiring a manual migration process for transfer and tethering desktop sessions to an active smartphone. **Features & Ecosystem:** Telegram's open Bot API allows for easy, free bot creation, while WeChat's massive ecosystem of over 4.8 million "mini-programs" operates within a closed, curated, and more regulated platform. Commenting also differs: Telegram uses integrated discussion threads for channels, whereas WeChat relies on pre-moderated comments for official accounts and separate chats for interaction. **File Sharing & Payments:** Telegram supports large file transfers (up to 4GB for Premium), while WeChat limits most files to 200MB. A key divergence is in payments: WeChat Pay is deeply integrated into daily life and commerce in China, whereas Telegram lacks a comparable built-in fiat payment system, focusing instead on third-party bots and crypto. **Analysis:** The comparison reveals two distinct models: WeChat is a tightly integrated, closed ecosystem deeply embedded in the real economy, while Telegram prioritizes open protocols, flexible data handling, and low barriers for developers. An added perspective notes that WeChat's fusion of messaging and payments in a single interface without end-to-end encryption for chats potentially broadens the attack surface, raising security questions as more functions converge.

cryptonews.ru4h ago

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

cryptonews.ru4h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片