В даркнете появился ИИ-сервис для кибератак

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2025-04-10Last updated on 2025-09-11

Эксперты обнаружили на теневых форумах новый ИИ-инструмент для автоматизации атак на электронную почту под названием SpamGPT. Его рекламируют как «революцию» для киберпреступников.

Платформа предназначена для взлома почтовых серверов, обхода спам-фильтров и организации массовых фишинговых кампаний.

SpamGPT сочетает возможности генеративного ИИ с набором инструментов для почтовых рассылок. Он снижает порог запуска спам- и фишинг-атак в больших масштабах.

Интерфейс SpamGPT. Данные: Varonis.

Интерфейс и функции инструмента копируют профессиональные сервисы email-маркетинга. В нем содержатся модули для управления кампаниями, настройки SMTP/IMAP, тестирования доставки и аналитики, предлагая все удобства, к которым привык бы стандартный маркетолог.

Создатели продвигают SpamGPT как универсальную платформу spam-as-a-service. В нее встроен ИИ-ассистент, который генерирует фишинговый контент и предлагает оптимизации.

Благодаря этому злоумышленники могут делегировать искусственному интеллекту написание убедительных писем, подбор вариантов тем или предложение советов по продвижению.

Платформа обещает гарантированную отправку писем в папку «входящие» популярных почтовых сервисов (Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, Microsoft 365 и др.), что подразумевает ее тонкую настройку для обхода фильтров.

SpamGPT предоставляет обучающую программу. Она якобы рассказывает о секретных техниках взлома SMTP-серверов и создания неограниченного количества учетных записей по запросу.

Платформа также облегчает применение spoofing-техник: интерфейс позволяет задавать несколько личностей отправителей и настраивать заголовки писем, что дает возможность выдавать себя за доверенные домены или бренды.

Напомним, в сентябре хакеры взломали популярного разработчика на платформе NPM и внедрили в пакеты JavaScript вредоносный код для опустошения криптокошельков.

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit9m ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit9m ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手1h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片