Legacy Polygon Royalties Contract Exploit Drains $261K Through Reward Logic Flaw

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-06-24Востаннє оновлено о 2026-06-24

Анотація

A hacker exploited a legacy Polygon royalties contract, stealing approximately $261,200 in cryptocurrency. Security firm TenArmorAlert identified the attack on June 23. The exploit was made possible by a flaw in the contract's reward calculation logic within the Royal1155LD.beforeLdaTransfer() function. By executing several zero-value transactions, the attacker manipulated reward accounting and token ownership data, artificially inflating balances to enable excessive withdrawals. The attacker also utilized a flash loan to amplify the exploit's profit after repayment. This incident highlights ongoing security risks associated with older, inactive smart contracts that still hold funds, following similar recent exploits. Developers are urged to audit, update, or decommission such legacy deployments to prevent future attacks. The Polygon blockchain's core infrastructure was not compromised.

A hacker used a legacy royalties contract on the Polygon platform and made away with about $261,200 worth of cryptocurrency in recent times. The security firm TenArmorAlert identified the unusual transaction on June 23 and tracked down the exploit transaction.

The blockchain shows that the hacker carried out the attack using the Polygon block 89,018,051 transaction. According to TenArmorAlert, the hacker managed to withdraw roughly $263,800 despite the relatively low initial amount of money. The attack was on the legacy royalties program and not the fundamental structure of the Polygon blockchain.

Miscalculation in Reward Calculation Allowed for Overdraws

According to TenArmorAlert, the attack was possible due to issues in the reward calculation mechanism and reward accounting. Security company CertiK found out about an issue with the Royal1155LD.beforeLdaTransfer() function in the exploited contract.

Researchers state that the attacker made several zero-value transactions, manipulating reward calculation and ownership numbers. This vulnerability allowed the attacker to make the token balance higher under certain conditions.

The Defimon Alerts also provided other research by DecurityHQ. In this case, experts concluded that royalty miscalculations led to the exploit. This way, false ownership numbers were allowing for excessive reward claiming. In addition, the attacker used a flash loan to exploit this contract. After repaying the borrowed amount, the attacker got the rest of the money as a profit.

Still Vulnerable to Security Threats

The latest attack has come in light of other similar attacks on older versions of decentralized finance projects as well as dormant smart contract deployments. Attackers have recently carried out an exploitation of some old contracts of Huma Finance and have stolen roughly $101,400.

Researchers have been cautioning developers regarding the possible dangers of having old versions of smart contracts with available finances. The team should audit, update, deactivate, or completely remove the old deployment in order to mitigate the danger of any potential attacks. Polygon developers have confirmed that attackers have not been able to threaten the security of the main blockchain network.

Highlighted Crypto News:

SecondFi Exploit Exposes Wallet Keys, Putting More Than $20M in Cardano Assets at Risk

TagsBlockchainCryptocurrencyHackHack AttackPolygonPolygon NetworkRewards

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the primary vulnerability that allowed the hacker to drain funds from the legacy Polygon royalties contract?

AThe primary vulnerability was a flaw in the reward calculation mechanism and reward accounting within the contract. Specifically, a miscalculation in the `Royal1155LD.beforeLdaTransfer()` function allowed the attacker to manipulate reward calculations and ownership numbers, enabling them to inflate token balances and withdraw excessive funds.

QHow much cryptocurrency did the hacker manage to steal in the exploit, according to the article?

AThe hacker stole approximately $261,200 worth of cryptocurrency. A specific transaction tracked by TenArmorAlert shows the hacker withdrew roughly $263,800 from the contract.

QWhat technique did the attacker use to exploit the contract, aside from manipulating the reward logic?

AIn addition to manipulating the reward logic, the attacker used a flash loan to exploit the contract. They borrowed funds to execute the attack and, after repaying the loan, kept the remaining amount as profit.

QAccording to the article, what action should developers take to mitigate the risk of similar attacks on older smart contracts?

ADevelopers should audit, update, deactivate, or completely remove old deployments of smart contracts that still hold available finances. This is necessary to mitigate the danger of potential attacks targeting legacy code with known or newly discovered vulnerabilities.

QDid the exploit compromise the core security of the Polygon blockchain itself?

ANo, the exploit did not compromise the core security of the Polygon blockchain. The attack targeted a specific, legacy royalties program contract, not the fundamental structure of the Polygon network. Polygon developers confirmed that the main blockchain network's security was not threatened.

Пов'язані матеріали

Прогноз цены биткоина: Даёт ли задержка CLARITY Act учреждениям время загрузиться до $73,000

**Bitcoin Price Forecast: Technical Consolidation Amidst Institutional Catalysts** Bitcoin (BTC) has broken out above a cup-and-handle pattern near $65,000 and is now consolidating in the $64,000-$65,500 range, a typical post-breakout behavior. Key support lies at the 20-day and 50-day EMAs ($64,336 and $64,649), while major resistance is seen at the 100-day EMA ($66,825), the 200-day EMA ($72,195), and a measured move target of $73,000. Derivatives data shows increased activity, with options volume surging 65.88% and short liquidations dominating, indicating underlying pressure on bearish bets. Top traders maintain a solid net-long position. Fundamental analysis centers on two catalysts. Analyst Ash Crypto compares the delay of the CLARITY Act to BlackRock's 2022-2024 ETF playbook, suggesting institutions may use the regulatory postponement to accumulate at lower prices before potential massive capital inflows. Separately, Michael Saylor's recent hint could signal MicroStrategy may resume its Bitcoin purchasing program. An independent analyst notes Bitcoin concentration has risen to 14.8%, signaling increased volatility risk. In the current context of an uptrend, this is viewed more as a volatility warning than a bearish signal. **Bullish Case (Target: $73,000):** Holds consolidation above key EMAs, institutional accumulation narrative gains traction, and short squeezes propel price toward resistance levels. **Bearish Case (Risk Level: $62,000):** Breakout structure fails if price closes below the 50-day EMA ($64,649), potentially triggering a volatile move down to test the $62,000 handle support, with a deeper fall to $55,000 possible.

cryptonews.ru2 хв тому

Прогноз цены биткоина: Даёт ли задержка CLARITY Act учреждениям время загрузиться до $73,000

cryptonews.ru2 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片