Digital Asset Treasuries under fire as token-holding firms lose steam

TheCryptoTimes发布于2025-09-09更新于2025-09-09

Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs), public companies formed primarily to buy crypto, are facing a sharp reality check. After months of parabolic stock gains and grand promises, the sector is now navigating declining share prices, reduced Bitcoin purchases, and mounting skepticism about the sustainability of the entire model.

DAT stocks slide despite crypto rally

While major indices like the S&P 500 continue pushing higher, shares of token-holding companies are heading in the opposite direction. According to Architect Partners, a group of 15 DATs dropped an average of 15% last week alone.

Names like ALT5 Sigma, tied to Trump-linked World Liberty Financial’s WLFI token, have fallen nearly 50%. Meanwhile, Kindly MD, which holds Bitcoin via subsidiary Nakamoto Holdings, is down over 80% from its May peak. Even companies exposed to ETH and SOL haven’t been spared, with token values and corresponding equities sinking in tandem.

“There are way too many of them and very little differentiation,” said Ed Chin, co-founder of Parataxis Capital, a firm that recently backed a Bitcoin treasury company in South Korea.

A flood of token buyers, from nail salons to meal kits

More than 100 companies have jumped into the DAT space this year, often through overnight pivots, think cannabis brands, nail salons, and ad agencies suddenly rebranding as Bitcoin holders. Most of these firms hold little more than volatile tokens and a pitch deck.

And yet, speculation still finds a way. On Monday, Eightco Holdings surged 3,000% after announcing plans to buy Worldcoin and bringing on Wall Street analyst Dan Ives as a board member.

The Bitcoin-buying engine is sputtering

Despite occasional outliers, the broader trend is cooling. CryptoQuant reports that DATs acquired just 14,800 BTC in August—down from 66,000 BTC in June. Average purchase sizes have shrunk nearly 86% from 2025 highs. More tellingly, accumulation rates have plummeted from 163% in March to just 8% last month, revealing a dramatic slowdown in net buying behavior.

Exotic financing: high risk, low clarity

In an attempt to extract more leverage, DATs have turned to bespoke financial tools: Bitcoin-backed loans, token-linked convertibles, and structured payouts that often blur the line between strategy and speculation.

Smarter Web Co., a UK-based web firm, issued a bond tied to BTC’s price, meaning its debt burden rises as Bitcoin does. CEO Andrew Webley insisted only 5% of their treasury is exposed. “If Bitcoin goes down, we repay the debt,” he said. “If it goes up, our shares should rise faster.”

DDC Enterprise, formerly a struggling meal company, now claims access to over $1 billion in capital through a maze of debt lines and equity facilities. Its stock, too, has crashed after an earlier vertical rally.

Nasdaq tightens rules amid dilution concerns

The Nasdaq has reportedly begun asking some DATs to obtain shareholder approval before issuing new shares to fund token purchases—a direct hit to the dilution-heavy model that many of these companies rely on.

The Rise And Fall Of Strategy's Mnav Premium, Source: BloombergThe Rise And Fall Of Strategy's Mnav Premium, Source: Bloomberg
Strategy’s mNAV Graphic. Source: Bloomberg

Even heavyweights like Strategy and Metaplanet Inc., once poster children for the DAT boom, have seen their valuations stumble. Strategy was left out of the S&P 500 rebalance last Friday despite qualifying on paper. Its Bitcoin-to-market-cap ratio (mNAV) now sits around 1.5, and its stock has barely moved since April, even as Bitcoin rallied. Earlier this week, the firm bought another $217 million in BTC, but investor response was muted.

Crypto lenders step in—but for how long?

Firms like Two Prime, a provider of BTC-collateralized loans, are seeing increased demand from DATs. CEO Alexander Blume noted the firm has $1.25 billion in active open loans, with individual deals ranging from $10 million to $500 million. New structures like fixed-term bullet loans are being marketed as “breathing room” for firms under pressure.

But critics argue the strategy may be less about growth and more about survival.

As enthusiasm fades, the DAT model looks less like a bridge between crypto and capital markets—and more like a short-term trade built on low float and high hope. With Bitcoin ETFs now offering exposure without the baggage of equity dilution or operational risk, investors are beginning to ask: why buy a company for its coins when you can just buy the coins?

As Travis Kling, CIO of Ikigai Asset Management, bluntly put it:

“I’ve been trying to convince myself to buy some of these DATs. Haven’t gotten there. May never get there.”


Mobile Only ImageMobile Only Image

你可能也喜欢

互联网资本市场2026:美国结构性转变与亚洲机构的战略窗口

互联网资本市场2026:美国结构性转变与亚洲机构的战略窗口 本文认为,新技术产业发展通常经历实验、过热、监管介入和产业形成四个阶段。加密行业已度过实验与过热期(如ICO、DeFi浪潮),在经历FTX事件等洗牌后,正进入监管介入与产业形成的交汇阶段。 美国监管进展显著,如《GENIUS法案》明确了稳定币地位,SEC和CFTC将SOL等资产确认为数字商品。机构采用加速,链上代币化资产(RWA)和稳定币总规模已近3000亿美元。 文章提出“互联网资本市场”概念,即资产的发行、交易和结算在单一公链上实时完成(T+0),以智能合约替代传统中介,消除结算延迟和隐性成本。美国正引领此变革。 Solana被视为该市场的具体实现,其高吞吐、低费用和Token-2022标准(内置合规功能)满足了机构需求。摩根大通、道富银行、花旗、Visa等多家美国大型金融机构已在Solana上开展真实交易或概念验证,案例覆盖债券发行、贸易融资、全球汇款、资产代币化等多个领域。 监管格局部分确立(如数字商品分类、稳定币规则),但前沿领域如股票代币化、DEX监管等仍有待立法(如《CLARITY法案》)。 对于亚洲机构而言,战略窗口在于作为“快速跟随者”,借鉴美国已验证的基础设施和监管框架。可根据本地监管成熟度分阶段执行:监管明确地区(如新加坡、香港)可立即商业化;监管过渡地区(如韩国)应提前搭建运营结构;监管探索地区则需保持小规模实验能力。 结论指出,互联网资本市场已成为运行中的现实。机构选择基于实际的技术与合规需求,而非偏好。亚洲机构的决策关键不再是“是否进入”,而是“以何种顺序和切入点进入”。当前“验证已完成但标准未固化”的区间,正是可利用的战略窗口,但其持续时间不确定。

marsbit53分钟前

互联网资本市场2026:美国结构性转变与亚洲机构的战略窗口

marsbit53分钟前

交易

现货
活动图片