标普500调整大幕已拉开,盯紧关键点位

比推Published on 2025-08-04Last updated on 2025-08-04

一、一周行情回顾:(07.28~08.01)

周一开盘价6397.69点,周四创出最高价6427.02点,周五触及最低价6212.69点,最终收盘价6238.01点,周振幅214.33点,跌幅2.36%,周线收出一根阴K线,收盘价收在5周均线之下,继续创出标普500指数的历史新高。

标普500指数周K线图:(动能量化模型*情绪量化模型)

image.png

(图一)

标普500指数日K线图:

image.png

(图二)

标普500指数周线图:(历史数据回测)

image.png

(图三)

自4月7日反弹以来,指数已经连续上涨17周,共计81个交易日,累计最大涨幅达到32.92%。本周指数跌幅2.36%,周线收出一根中阴K线。

笔者上周文章的题目是《标普500上涨进入高风险区,短期谨防剧烈震荡》,在文章中运用多周期量化模型指标以及十几年历史数据回测,并结合当前宏观经济层面对金融市场的影响,提示下周指数还会创出新高,但由于指数处于技术超买+上涨时间周期末端,提醒投资者切勿被强势表象所迷惑,行情已进入高风险区;预测下周行情维持高位震荡结构,留意盘中剧烈波动,谨防单日大阴线快速杀跌。

从本周走势来看,周一小幅震荡,日线收出十字星;接下来两天连续收出阴线,跌幅不大;周四股价大幅高开并创出历史新高6427.02点后,开始缓慢下跌,收出一根高开低走的阴线,成交量明显放大,震荡幅度加大;周五股价跳空低开后持续下跌,当日收出一根低开低走的中阴线,日线留下跳空缺口。本周指数走势与笔者预测基本相符。

接下来,笔者从多维度层面分析当前指数所发生的变化:

(一)、量化模型信号分析:

1、周线视角(见图一):

①、动能量化模型:持续发出高位钝化信号,动能1号线运行方向从向上转为走平状态,能量柱与上周相比开始缩短。

②、情绪量化模型,指标仍然在处在高位,但是与上周相比减少。情绪1强度是0.54(取值范围0~10)左右,情绪2强度是1.99左右。

③、数字监测模型:上周收盘价是6388.64点,监测信号显示数字D(取值A~E),本周信号消失。如果接下来每周的收盘价均小于6388.64点,预示数字D见顶信号有效。震荡值0.73(取值范围0~1)。

④、顶峰信号:数值是4.65,指数仍在高风险区域。

2、日线视角(见图二):

①、动能量化模型:处在高位顶背离状态,周二动能1号线高位死叉动能2号线开始向下运行,两条信号线由粘合转为向下张口,能量(绿)柱逐步放大,预示做空力量加强。

②、情绪量化模型:指标脱离高位区,开始减小。

③、数字监控模型:周二监测信号显示高位数字9,随后三天信号消失,预示日线级别见顶(以收盘价为标准)信号有效。

④、顶峰信号:数值从周二最高值8.49降到周五2.13,说明指数开始调整。

⑤、量能方面:本周后两天成交量明显放大,呈现放量下跌状态,初现调整特征。

(二)、趋势时序与历史数据回测分析(图三):

①、回测数据区间:2009年3月6日2025年4月4日,共计840根周K线。

②、设定调整规则是:回调≤2周且跌幅≥5%,或者回调≥3周,回测数据中符合条件的调整共有52次。

③、统计历史数据寻找规律:每当指数从低点连续上涨16周后,出现调整的概率高达81%左右,并且出现大幅调整的概率较大。

④、从4月7日到7月25日,指数已经连续上涨16周时间,本周是第17周。指数在本周如期出现明显调整,静观行情后续走势。

二、下周行情预测:

1、笔者认为下周指数还会向下调整,重要支撑位在6147点附近,一次有效跌破的概率不大;指数调整到此处会有反弹,第一压力位在6300点附近,重要压力位在6247点附近。

2、指数盘中出现拉升时,借机调整仓位,切勿盲目追高,警惕指数形成二次顶的风险。

3、提醒投资者密切关注市场消息面的变化,关注大市值权重股的异动。

三、下周操作策略:

1、下周重点关注6147点的得失。若支撑有效,继续维持高位宽幅震荡;若有效跌破,则调整幅度加大,注意下跌风险。

1、中线仓位:笔者连续提示投资者,将21日均线作为止盈位。目前指数已经跌破,建议中线仓位减少到原有仓位的30%。个股亦可参照操作。

2、短线仓位:按照笔者给出的关键点位,设置好止损点,小仓位逢低做多,逢高做空。个股亦可参照操作

3、如果想得到更加精确的操作,可以把分析周期切换到小周期,例如60分钟或者120分钟周期。

以上各种模型是本人操作时遵守的交易规则,不构成任何买卖依据。个人观点,仅作参考。

作者:Cody Feng


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Related Reads

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

Invesco Great Wall Fund has released its "2026 China Corporate Globalization Report," titled "The 'Great Navigation Era' of Chinese Enterprises." The report analyzes the new trends and investment opportunities as Chinese companies expand globally, moving from simple product exports to comprehensive overseas operations involving services, branding, and local production. Driven by factors like trade friction, the pursuit of higher profit margins abroad, and policy support, globalization is becoming essential for Chinese companies. The report outlines an evolution: from early product export ("Globalization 1.0") to the current "Globalization 2.0," characterized by overseas capacity, capital goods investment, consumer brand expansion, and service exports. Chinese firms' competitive advantages are highlighted, including a vast engineer talent pool, low-cost and robust infrastructure, and complete industrial clusters. Specific sectors with significant出海 potential are identified: * **Capital Goods** (e.g., engineering machinery, power equipment): Benefiting from global demand, especially in Belt & Road markets and the AI-driven power grid upgrade cycle. * **Consumer Brands**: Transitioning from cost to brand advantage, leveraging供应链 efficiency. * **Technology & Innovation**: Including AI applications, optical modules within global tech supply chains, and new energy vehicles focusing on local production. * **Pharmaceuticals**: Chinese biotech firms are becoming preferred partners for global pharma, with potential for breakthrough drugs in areas like oncology and weight loss. The report concludes that corporate globalization represents a sustained, core theme for China's capital markets, though companies must navigate challenges like geopolitics and localization.

marsbitHá 14m

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

marsbitHá 14m

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbitHá 53m

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbitHá 53m

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbitHá 1h

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片