SharpLink Gaming Acquires Another 79,949 ETH, Treasury Continues To Grow Over $1B

ccn.comPublished on 2025-07-22Last updated on 2025-07-22

Key Takeaways
  • SharpLink Gaming has acquired a total 360,807 ETH, valued at over $1 billion.
  • Ethereum co-founder and founder of Consensys, Joseph Lubin, has endorsed SharpLink’s Ethereum purchases as a commitment to the asset’s vision.
  • An increasing number of corporate firms are turning to Ethereum over Bitcoin.

SharpLink Gaming has acquired another 79,949 ETH, as its Ethereum treasury continues to grow over $1 billion, further cementing its position as the largest corporate Ethereum holder.

Joseph Lubin, co-founder of Ethereum and founder of Consensys, previously commended the firm’s purchases as a long-term commitment to the digital asset’s vision.

SharpLink Gaming Accumulates ETH

On Tuesday, July 22, sportsbook marketing firm SharpLink acquired an additional 79,949 ETH for a total $258 million at an average price of $3,238.

The move marks its largest weekly purchase to date, as its treasury continues to grow over the $1 billion mark.

According to a press release , the company’s total treasury sits at 360,807 ETH, up 29% from the previous week.

On July 17, the company acquire 20,279 ETH, bringing its total holdings to 307,362 ETH.

According to on-chain data , the firm added 10,614 ETH worth $35.62 million from Coinbase to its reserve, then an additional 10,854 ETH worth $34.37 million.

The firm has been aggressively buying Ethereum in batches of 10,000 up to 25,000, as it races to pile on its strategic reserve.

Joseph Lubin Endorses Purchase

SharpLink’s entry into Ethereum prompted Consensys to lead the firm’s $425 million fundraising round in June.

Following a recent purchasing spree, Joseph Lubin, Consensys founder and a key Ethereum developer, praised the move as a strategic and enduring commitment:

“At a time when Ethereum is entering a new era of institutional relevance, we are proud to support the network’s long-term strength and decentralization mission,” he said.

“Moreover, we see this as the start of something bigger – a model for how mission-driven organizations can work to advance our ecosystem’s shared goals of decentralization, economic empowerment and protocol-native finance,” Lubin added.

As part of Consensys’ support, Lubin has become Chairman of SharpLink to help guide the firm’s integration of Ethereum “into its core operations and long-term vision.”

Corporate Shift Toward Ethereum

A broader trend is emerging in the corporate world, with Ethereum increasingly taking precedence over Bitcoin in some digital asset strategies.

One prominent example is Bit Digital, a digital asset firm that was previously focused on building a Bitcoin-centric treasury.

On July 7, the company announced it had sold 280 Bitcoin and would use those funds, alongside proceeds from a recent public offering, to acquire over 100,000 ETH.

“As of today, Bit Digital has accumulated over 100,000 ETH,” the company wrote.

“But we are not new to Ethereum, nor to our conviction in its opportunity,” they added.

Several factors have driven this shift.

Leading financial institutions like BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, and PayPal are building on Ethereum, underscoring its central role in financial innovation.

There is also growing anticipation that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may approve Ethereum ETFs with staking capabilities, transforming them into income-generating instruments via staking rewards.

At the same time, Ethereum has strengthened its leadership in tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), hosting over $7 billion in assets such as U.S. Treasuries and equities, all backed by its secure and transparent infrastructure.

While Bitcoin maintains its reputation as “digital gold,” Ethereum is increasingly viewed as a high-growth technology platform aiming to become an integral part of the financial system’s future.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

In a new article, Dr. Fei-Fei Li addresses the widespread and often inconsistent use of the term "world model" in AI. She proposes a clear, functional taxonomy rooted in the classic Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) loop (agent → action → state → observation → agent). According to this framework, current systems called "world models" are different projections of this loop, categorized by their primary output: 1. **Renderers**: Output observations (pixels). Their goal is visual fidelity for human consumption (e.g., video generation models like Sora). They are the most commercially mature but are limited by a focus on appearance over physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output states (geometric, physical, dynamic representations). They provide a structurally accurate world for both human professionals (e.g., architects) and computational agents (e.g., robots for training). Li argues simulators are the crucial, underappreciated bridge, as they can underpin both rendering and planning. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they decide what an agent should do next (e.g., robotic action models). This area is highly promising but remains the least mature for real-world deployment. Li highlights a key trend: the boundaries between these three categories are beginning to blur, as they all rely on a shared underlying understanding of geometry, physics, and dynamics. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of switching between rendering, simulation, and planning based on downstream needs. This convergence, she concludes, is central to advancing spatial intelligence—enabling machines not just to talk about the world, but to truly understand, imagine, and interact with it.

marsbit3h ago

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

marsbit3h ago

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbit3h ago

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片