Elon Musk’s Crypto Dream May ‘Derail’ After Donald Trump Feud, Stablecoin Legislation Pending

ccn.comPublished on 2025-06-09Last updated on 2025-06-09

Key Takeaways
  • Elon Musk’s alleged effort to integrate stablecoin payments into X through “X Money” faces mounting pressure as his public feud with Donald Trump escalates.
  • As Trump gains influence among pro-crypto conservatives, losing that backing could leave Musk isolated just as legislative scrutiny ramps up against stablecoins.
  • Companies like Uber and Airbnb are also reportedly investigating stablecoins’ potential to reduce costs and improve payment efficiency.

Elon Musk’s push to transform X into a financial services platform, complete with a potential stablecoin offering, has arrived at the billionaire’s worst possible political moment.

As lawmakers weigh sweeping legislation that could reshape the crypto industry, Musk now faces open hostility from former ally Donald Trump.

The fallout from their increasingly bitter public feud may not only threaten Tesla, which lost over $150 billion in market value, but also Musk’s grand ambitions to disrupt the digital payments and crypto space.

Musk’s Crypto Dreams

Musk’s plan to launch “X Money,” a peer-to-peer payments feature integrated with Visa, has already raised red flags among some in Washington.

According to Fortune , X has contacted several crypto firms to explore integrating stablecoins, digital currencies pegged to the value of the U.S. dollar, into the upcoming service.

In a May 25 post on X, the world’s richest man confirmed that the platform had entered a “very limited access beta.”

He added, “When people’s savings are involved, extreme care must be taken.”

But with Congress now debating whether to limit tech firms’ use of stablecoins, the potential crypto integration could be off the cards.

Lawmakers, particularly Democrats, are pushing to ensure that digital currencies do not allow big technology companies to blur the line between commerce and banking.

In May, Democrats made a last-minute pushback to the Trump-backed GENIUS Act, which aims to provide more regulatory clarity over stablecoins used for payments.

Democrats have called for amendments to the regulation that would make it harder for tech firms to use stablecoins to get into financial services.

“If the GENIUS Act goes forward without changes, Donald Trump will continue to line his pockets with his crypto scams – while his policies continue to tank the economy for the rest of us,” Senator Elizabeth Warren said on May 5 .

For Musk, the timing couldn’t be worse. His once-close ties to Trump had helped blunt Republican criticism of his ventures, particularly around regulatory leniency and federal contracts.

Musk and Trump Feud May Damage Crypto Ambitions

Legal experts have begun to weigh in on the broader implications of the Trump–Musk fallout, especially as Congress edges closer to regulating stablecoins.

Joseph Osborne, a legal expert with Osborne and Francis, believes the timing of the rift could prove devastating for Musk’s ambitions in crypto.

“Can one billionaire’s feud with another derail an entire fintech ambition? In the world of crypto and politics: absolutely,” Osborne told CCN.

“While Musk’s vision for X as a financial platform is bold, political friction like this narrows his influence at a critical time,” Osborne said, noting that crypto legislation is no longer a theoretical debate.

Osborne also highlighted the shifting crypto politics within the Republican party.

“The stablecoin conversation in Congress is gaining momentum, and any credible entrant, especially one as high-profile as Musk, needs political allies, not adversaries,” he said.

“Trump’s crypto stance has warmed considerably, and he’s amassed a strong base among pro-crypto conservatives. Losing his informal endorsement could mean Musk faces added scrutiny and less cooperation, both formally and behind the scenes.”

With Congress likely to push for provisions around transparency and tight regulatory frameworks for any firm issuing stablecoins, Musk’s characteristically hands-off approach could face challenges.

“Stablecoin legislation will likely demand transparency, reserves, and regulatory oversight: none of which align seamlessly with Musk’s historically libertarian tech ethos,” Osborne said.

“Without bipartisan support or key backers like Trump, Musk may struggle to push through a financial product that needs public trust and political tolerance.”

In Osborne’s view, any path forward will require recalibration.

“To advance any stablecoin ambition, Musk must rethink his political alliances and possibly make strategic compromises in regulation and partnerships,” he said.

“Crypto is no longer the Wild West. Now, it’s entering the legislative mainstream. And without political capital, even Elon Musk may find himself locked out of the vault,” Osborne added.

Tech Firms and Stablecoins

The political battle is unfolding at a time when several major tech companies are exploring stablecoin integration.

Leading tech companies, including Uber, Apple, and Airbnb, have been exploring an entry into the crypto space amid Trump’s digital asset push but remain blocked by regulatory hurdles.

Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi recently noted that stablecoins could reduce cross-border costs, claiming the company was in the “study-phase” of exploring the assets.

Speaking at the Bloomberg Tech Conference, Khosrowshahi said stablecoins offer “a practical benefit other than crypto’s historic value.”

Meanwhile, Fortune reported that Airbnb was in talks with stablecoin infrastructure firm BNVK.

Firms are exploring stablecoins to save costs and boost efficiency in payment processing and international transactions, but agreed legislative clarity among lawmakers remains a long way off.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

"Lean Ethereum" Long-Term Roadmap Unveiled by Vitalik Buterin On July 5, 2026, Vitalik Buterin published the "Lean Ethereum" roadmap, positioning it as Ethereum's third major evolution following the Merge. This multi-year, multi-phase upgrade aims to fundamentally transform Ethereum's core protocol through staged network upgrades extending to 2029. Key goals include achieving 1 gigagas per second L1 throughput (a massive increase from the current ~32 TPS), near-instant finality, and quantum-resistant cryptography. The plan involves transitioning Ethereum's security model from full transaction re-execution by all nodes to native verification via recursive STARK proofs. A major proposed change is replacing the EVM with a proof-friendly architecture like RISC-V or leanISA, though this remains a point of contention, especially with L2s like Arbitrum favoring alternatives like WASM. Other planned upgrades include a restructured state model with a large, cheap "warehouse" storage layer to drastically reduce fees for migrated applications, multi-dimensional gas pricing, and a new focus on making privacy a first-class, native protocol feature. While the roadmap significantly raises Ethereum's long-term technical ceiling, analysts note it does not directly address ETH's mid-term token economics or value capture. The plan's multi-year timeline means near-term price impact will likely depend on observable progress milestones, such as the successful deployment of the upcoming Glamsterdam gas limit increase, growth in L2 activity and blob usage, and trends in L1 fee revenue and ETH burn.

链捕手54m ago

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

链捕手54m ago

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

In just 11 days, Bun's founder Jarred Sumner used Anthropic's Claude AI models to rewrite its million lines of code from Zig to Rust. This move sparked significant controversy, particularly from Zig's creator, Andrew Kelley, who publicly criticized Sumner's engineering practices and the decision to use AI for such a massive rewrite. Bun, a high-performance JavaScript/TypeScript runtime and rival to Node.js, was originally written in Zig. After Anthropic acquired Bun, the team encountered persistent stability and memory safety bugs in the Zig codebase. These issues, combined with Zig's strict policy against LLM-generated code, led to the decision to rewrite in Rust. The rewrite was executed using Claude AI tools at an estimated API cost of $165,000, dramatically reducing the expected time and financial cost. Andrew Kelley's response was scathing. He blamed the original bugs on poor engineering habits, calling Bun's Zig code a collection of "hacks on top of hacks." He expressed relief that Bun was no longer associated with Zig, fearing it would misrepresent the language and attract low-quality, AI-generated contributions. The tech community is divided; some view Kelley's critique as unprofessional, while others see it as a defense of engineering integrity. A major concern about the AI-driven rewrite is the resulting code quality. The translation from Zig left approximately 27,000 lines of unsafe Rust code, raising fears about long-term maintainability and technical debt. The debate centers on whether this project is a milestone in AI-assisted development or a future maintenance nightmare.

marsbit1h ago

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

marsbit1h ago

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin and Now AI: Cango's "What Not to Do" Strategy Cango, a Chinese auto finance platform that went public on the NYSE in 2018, is undergoing its third major transformation. After selling its entire auto business in 2024, it pivoted to become a large-scale Bitcoin miner, acquiring 50 exahash of mining rigs from Bitmain. However, its true goal was never Bitcoin, but owning and controlling energy infrastructure. Now, Cango is pivoting again. While most listed Bitcoin miners are leasing power to giant hyperscalers for AI training clusters, Cango is taking the opposite path. It has launched an AI inference subsidiary called EcoHash, focusing not on training but on distributed inference. The company's strategy hinges on the insight that over 70% of mining industry power is controlled by small, independent sites (10-50 MW), which are too small for hyperscalers but ideal for low-latency AI inference. Cango aims to partner with these small operators, providing the AI technology, customers, and financing through its EcoLink software layer, which can distribute workloads across sites for reliability. Cango maintains a hybrid model, running roughly 31.7 EH/s of Bitcoin mining for cash flow while aggressively cleaning its balance sheet—slashing long-term debt by 94.5% to $30.6 million and raising $75 million for its AI venture. Its first AI deployment will be at a 50 MW site in Georgia. The strategy faces skepticism, given the high costs of converting mining sites and the potential for an AI bubble. However, Cango's leadership believes discipline around "what not to do"—avoiding direct competition with hyperscalers in training—positions it to capture the long-tail demand for distributed AI inference power.

Foresight News2h ago

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

Foresight News2h ago

Strategy's Bitcoin Sales Cap Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion: A Detail the Market Overlooked

The article discusses how MicroStrategy's potential Bitcoin sales go far beyond the announced $1.25 billion "reserve-building capacity." It clarifies a key distinction in the company's "BTC Monetization Program": selling Bitcoin to *build* a new dollar reserve (the $1.25B cap) versus selling to *replenish* the existing USD Reserve after it's used for expenses like preferred share dividends. The recent $216M BTC sale for dividend payments was a "replenishment," leaving the headline $1.25B building quota untouched. The plan actually outlines three potential funding pools from BTC sales: 1) Building the reserve ($1.25B cap), 2) Covering preferred share/ debt costs (no specified cap), and 3) Funding buyback programs (up to $20B). This means the structured sales potential exceeds $30 billion, not including uncapped replenishment sales. The piece argues this marks MicroStrategy's shift from a passive "buy-and-hold" Bitcoin proxy to an actively managed entity using BTC as a balance-sheet tool to manage its complex capital structure (common stock, preferred shares, debt, reserve). This creates new dynamics and potential conflicts, as actions benefiting one part (e.g., selling BTC to pay dividends) may pressure another (e.g., undermining the "never sell" narrative). Investors must now parse the company's specific terminology ("build" vs. "replenish") to understand the true scope of future BTC sales, which is significantly larger than the market initially perceived.

marsbit2h ago

Strategy's Bitcoin Sales Cap Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion: A Detail the Market Overlooked

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片