Nike Sued After Shuttering NFT Unit—Buyers Allege Major Crypto Losses

bitcoinistPublicado a 2025-04-27Actualizado a 2025-04-28

Resumen

A collective of upset NFT purchasers has brought a lawsuit against Nike after the company shut down its digital collectibles...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

A collective of upset NFT purchasers has brought a lawsuit against Nike after the company shut down its digital collectibles division, RTFKT.

According to a report by Reuters, the lawsuit, filed Friday in Brooklyn, New York, alleges that the sportswear colossus’s sudden shutdown erased hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of digital asset value.

Australian Investor Leads Legal Fight Against Sportswear Giant

Australia-based lead plaintiff Jagdeep Cheema leads the class of plaintiffs that is demanding at least $5 million in damages. According to court filings, Nike’s December 2024 shutdown of RTFKT left investors with worthless digital tokens created and sold on both the Nike and RTFKT brands.

The complaint states Nike breached consumer defense laws in a number of states, including New York, California, Florida, and Oregon. Nike, headquartered in Beaverton, Oregon, has yet to respond to the claims.

Lawsuit Puts Key Question: Are NFTs Securities?

The court filing contends Nike sold the NFTs without registering them properly with financial authorities. This poses a basic question that US regulators and courts are still grappling to answer: Are NFTs securities subject to regulatory scrutiny?

Purchasers said the company provided no notice before cancelling the initiative. Numerous NFTs ceased to show images properly, contributing to fears the assets would no longer be supported or held their worth.

Total crypto market cap currently at $2.9 trillion. Chart: TradingView

They wouldn’t have bought any of the NFTs if they had known they were unregistered securities, the plaintiffs said in their lawsuit. The group also alleged they would not have invested if they had known Nike could cancel the project so soon after its inception.

Technical Issues Haunt Digital Assets Following Service Shutdown

After the December shutdown, numerous users complained of severe technical problems with their NFTs. Images of highly prized objects in the Clone X series went missing, being replaced with “holding page” messages from Cloudflare stating that the content was taken down.

This led speculation that Nike stopped paying for servers that were displaying the NFT images. While some digital works have resurfaced online afterward, the incident raised legitimate doubts about the ultimate value of digital art attached to centralized services.

Nike’s NFT Adventure Had Brief But Memorable Existence

RTFKT (pronounced “artifact”) was bought by Nike in December 2021 at the peak of NFT popularity. The sports company termed the acquisition as a bold step into the future of collectibles and fashion and gaming.

The attorney for the plaintiffs, Phillip Kim, has yet to comment further on the case.

When digital collectibles became trendy, numerous firms jumped in without set regulations or oversight mechanisms. This suit identifies the danger that comes with large corporations testing and then abandoning nascent digital asset segments.

Featured image Nike, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Lecturas Relacionadas

La red eléctrica de EE.UU. emite alerta roja ante la ola de calor, ¿la minería de Bitcoin se convierte en el "chivo expiatorio"?

A finales de junio de 2026, una intensa ola de calor ("cúpula de calor") puso al límite a PJM, la mayor red eléctrica de EE.UU., que atiende a 67 millones de personas. Ante la amenaza de apagones y precios mayoristas disparados (hasta 2.000 dólares/MWh), el Departamento de Energía emitiórdenes de emergencia. Una de ellas obligaba a grandes consumidores, como granjas de minería de Bitcoin, a desconectarse en 15 minutos. Contrariamente a la imagen de simples "devoradores de energía", estos mineros participan en programas de "respuesta a la demanda" eléctrica. Al apagarse durante picos de consumo, reciben compensaciones financieras, lo que puede ser más rentable que minar. Empresas como Riot Platforms obtuvieron 21 millones de dólares en créditos en el primer trimestre de 2026, reduciendo su coste de minería. El artículo señala que, aunque la minería de Bitcoin a menudo es señalada, su consumo representa solo entre el 0.6% y el 2.3% de la demanda nacional. El verdadero desafío para la red son los centros de datos de IA, cuya demanda proyectada está provocando una escasez crítica. Ante esto, algunas grandes empresas mineras, como Riot Platforms, están transformando su infraestructura eléctrica y sus instalaciones para albergar servidores de IA, encontrando un nuevo modelo de negocio más allá de la criptominería.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

La red eléctrica de EE.UU. emite alerta roja ante la ola de calor, ¿la minería de Bitcoin se convierte en el "chivo expiatorio"?

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片