Минюст США пересмотрит процесс оценки размера компенсаций для пострадавших от криптомошенничества

investing.ruPubblicato 2025-04-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-04-17

GetBlock Magazine - Что произошло? Минюст США заинтересовался механизмом выплат компенсаций пострадавшим клиентам обанкротившихся криптокомпаний. Согласно новому меморандуму, чиновники намерены пересмотреть оценку конфискованных активов, предназначенных к возвращению, и выяснить, должны ли жертвы криптомошенничества получать выплаты исходя из актуальных курсов цифровых активов. Ведомство заинтересовали громкие кейсы 2022 года: банкротства биржи FTX, а также лендинговых платформ Voyager, Celsius, BlockFi и Genesis.

Меморандум Минюста

Что еще известно? Хотя Минюст не является регулятором цифровых активов и не все из указанных дел о банкротстве включали уголовные обвинения, чиновники обратили внимание, что в некоторых случаях речь шла о потере цифровых активов из-за мошенничества и краж, а стоимость этих активов резко возрастала в последующие годы.

Например, FTX Сэма Бэнкмана-Фрида подала заявление о банкротстве 11 ноября 2022 года, когда биткоин торговался на уровне $17 500. В январе текущего года актив обновил исторический максимум выше $108 000, и хотя к настоящему моменту он снизился до $84 000, это все еще значительная доходность, которая, однако, недоступна пострадавшим. Так, по решению суда они получат компенсации в фиате по курсу на момент банкротства.

Однако возврат в натуральной форме также несет огромный риск для жертв, поскольку многие токены со временем сильно обесцениваются. Учитывая, что дела о банкротстве затягиваются на годы, инвесторы в мелкие альткоины могут вовсе не получить никаких компенсаций, поскольку курс к тому моменту может упасть до нуля.

Если Минюст получит одобрение Конгресса, он сможет издать обновленные правила и положения для криптоиндустрии, однако в меморандуме не уточняются сроки, в которые чиновники предложат улучшения политики оценки размера компенсаций.

Читайте оригинальную статью на сайте GetBlock Magazine

Letture associate

A Threefold Performance Leap! NEAR Achieves 200ms Physical Block Time Limit with SPICE

NEAR's core development team, Near One, has announced its next major protocol evolution: SPICE (Separation of Consensus and Execution). Currently in development, SPICE represents the most significant upgrade before the full implementation of Nightshade 3.0. Its core innovation is decoupling the consensus layer, responsible for ordering transactions, from the execution layer, which processes them. This allows the consensus layer to run at full speed without waiting for transaction execution to complete. Once deployed, SPICE is projected to triple NEAR's block production speed, achieving a 200ms block time, which is considered the physical limit due to the speed of light and network latency. This leap will dramatically reduce transaction latency and finality, with transactions confirming in roughly 0.4 seconds—faster than a typical card payment. The upgrade also enables more complex, long-running transactions and significantly improves user experience for applications like NEAR Intents and near.com. Beyond raw speed, SPICE enhances network scalability and security. It enables deeper parallelism, efficiently distributing workload across shards and improving resource utilization. The simpler block structure and lighter contracts also facilitate formal verification and security auditing. Furthermore, SPICE lays the critical groundwork for future Nightshade 3.0 features, most notably atomic cross-shard transactions, which would simplify complex contract logic and eliminate development hurdles caused by asynchronous execution. The Near One team is actively developing SPICE, targeting deployment in the coming months.

Foresight News13 min fa

A Threefold Performance Leap! NEAR Achieves 200ms Physical Block Time Limit with SPICE

Foresight News13 min fa

Deep Insight: Decentralized Inference is Not Hype, but a Key Track for AI to Break Through Centralized Monopoly

Decentralized Reasoning: Beyond the Hype, a Key to Breaking AI's Centralized Monopoly A future scenario where a powerful AI model is banned by a major government illustrates the core value proposition of decentralized AI: resistance to censorship. The core bet of decentralized inference networks is mitigating this risk, with other benefits like cost being secondary. The path is extremely difficult, involving four key challenges: 1. **Running Massive Models:** Distributing a single model across a decentralized GPU swarm requires sophisticated techniques like pipeline and speculative decoding to overcome crippling network latency, aiming for usable speeds (e.g., 30-40 tokens/second). 2. **Proving Model Integrity:** Verifying that a node runs the correct model is critical. Solutions range from cryptographically secure but slow ZKML to faster, economically-secure methods like statistical fingerprints, deterministic re-execution, or live-weight proofs, each involving trade-offs between integrity, latency, and cost. 3. **Ensuring Prompt Privacy:** Simply sharding a model does not protect user inputs from nodes. Robust solutions currently require trusted hardware (TEEs) or advanced cryptography (FHE), which are not yet widely deployed in consumer swarms. 4. **Building a Real Market:** Identifying the ideal customer is tough. Beyond speculative AI agents, the viable market currently consists of startups embedding AI and projects needing batch processing (e.g., synthetic data generation), where decentralized aggregation can be an advantage over low-latency needs. The article analyzes several projects tackling these problems, such as Dolphin Network (live-weight proofs), Inference.net (statistical verification), Morpheus (TEE-based), and Darkbloom (Apple Secure Enclave). It provides a framework: decentralization is a "tax" for latency-sensitive applications (e.g., chat) but a potential supply-side advantage for throughput-oriented tasks (e.g., batch processing). The long-term vision is a closed data loop where decentralized inference generates valuable data (traces, preferences) to feed decentralized training networks, which in turn produce better open-weight models for the inference networks. A due diligence checklist advises focusing on projects that: are truly decentralized at specific layers; have a credible integrity method; offer real cost benefits; ensure genuine privacy; handle node reliability; have paying users; and are built by teams with deep AI expertise. The ultimate goal should be products that appeal beyond the crypto-native audience, using crypto mechanisms invisibly to deliver better cost, performance, or privacy.

Foresight News41 min fa

Deep Insight: Decentralized Inference is Not Hype, but a Key Track for AI to Break Through Centralized Monopoly

Foresight News41 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片