Генпрокурор Нью-Йорка призвала Конгресс обновить криптовалютное законодательство

investing.ruPublished on 2025-04-11Last updated on 2025-04-11

В обращении к лидеру республиканского большинства в Сенате Джону Туну (John Thune) и спикеру Палаты представителей Майку Джонсону (Mike Johnson), Летиция Джеймс (Letitia James) заявила, что американские криптоинвесторы нуждаются в срочной и надежной защите от мошенничества и финансовых рисков.

«Тысячи инвесторов в Нью-Йорке и по всей стране потеряли миллионы долларов из-за мошенничества и афер с криптовалютой, которые можно было бы предотвратить с помощью более жестких федеральных правил», — сказала Джеймс.

Она предложила установить минимальные стандарты для листинга криптоактивов, чтобы повысить безопасность рынка, а также ввести требования об обязательной регистрации всех криптокомпаний в федеральном регулирующем органе, прежде чем они будут допущены к обслуживанию пользователей.

Ранее специальный советник юридической фирмы Cooley Родриго Сейра (Rodrigo Seira) заявил, что действующая в США нормативно-правовая база, ориентированная на контроль оборота ценных бумаг, не подходит для отрасли цифровых активов.

Читайте оригинальную статью на сайте Bits.media

Related Reads

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手6m ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手6m ago

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

The article discusses how companies in the AI era are competing for talent through strategic "title arbitrage," or the renaming of key roles to reflect and attract new, high-value capabilities. It uses Palantir's creation of the "Forward-Deployed Engineer" (FDE) as a prime example. This title reframed client-facing technical work from a peripheral "implementation" role into a core, high-status engineering function. The move was strategic, allowing Palantir to attract talent that blended technical skill with business acumen and to dominate the market's perception of this capability. The piece argues that job titles are an organizational language that signals the value and authority of certain work. Effective new titles, like "Data Scientist" or "Site Reliability Engineer," emerge when a role's strategic importance genuinely outgrows its old name. Conversely, mere title inflation without substantive change is ineffective. For AI companies, particularly in B2B, this is a crucial strategy. AI transformation creates new high-leverage roles (e.g., "Legal Engineer," "GTM Engineer") that combine domain expertise with technical automation. By naming these roles, a company can help clients internally legitimize these change-makers. This, in turn, builds market mindshare, associating the company with the new capability. In conclusion, as AI blurs the lines between product and service, the ability to accurately name and organize the critical, client-adjacent work that defines product learning will be a key competitive advantage. The first to define this new organizational language plants a flag in the market's mind.

marsbit1h ago

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片