Crypto 交易所报告: 现货上币策略, 2024 年 11 月 1 日 - 2025 年 2 月 15 日

tokeninsight_newsPublished on 2025-03-18Last updated on 2025-03-19

Abstract

根据前置分析,我们汇总了每个 CEX 的现货上币策略。

根据统计结果,交易所现货上币数量和速度排名如下:


现货上新
在牛市期间,MEXC 共上新了 461 个现货,数量上排名第一。Gate 排在第二,上新了 317 个现货。相较而言,BinanceOKX 采取的策略相对保守,分别仅上新了 24 和 19 个现货。11 月中旬,由 Meme 狂潮引领的牛市,带动所有主要中心化交易所的现货上新数量激增。


赛道总览
在统计时间段内,超过三分之一的现货上新归属于 Meme 赛道。这个趋势在 MEXC 和 Gate 的上新中尤为明显,分别有 39.26% 和 23.97% 的上新现货属于这一赛道。与此不同的是,OKX、BybitBitget 更专注于基础设施类项目,分别占其现货上新总数的 31.58%、26.23% 和 21.57%。其中值得注意的是,Bitget 还对 GameFi 板块给予了特殊关注,超过 17% 的上新属于该赛道。同时,Binance 表现出了其对 DeFi 赛道的关注,DeFi 类型现货占其上新总数的 33%。


链上交易板块
MEXC 和 Gate 分别提供了链上资产交易板块以帮助交易者在牛市期间更快触及链上热门资产:即 MEXC Meme+ 和 Gate Pilot。在选定时间段内,Gate 上新了更多的链上现货资产,而 MEXC 则有着更高的正式现货转化率和更低的破发率。


现货上新速度
根据市场趋势的变化,本报告选出了四个热门赛道:Meme、AI、DeSci Celebrity Meme。每个赛道中选择了两种类型的代币作为代表:一种是较多 CEX 上新的代币,另一种是短期内交易量激增的代币。
$TRUMP and $VINE 是最具代表性的名人 Meme,均已在多个交易所上市。 其中,MEXC 上币最为迅速。


MEXC 在 DeSci 和 Meme 领域的上币速度表现突出,而 Bitget 和 Gate 在 AI 领域上币速度更为迅速。有关详细的上币速度信息,请参阅完整报告。


现货上币策略
根据前置分析,我们汇总了每个 CEX 的现货上币策略。


以上是报告的部分关键内容,详细内容请下载报告全文阅读。想了解更多关于交易所流动性的信息吗?立刻免费下载阅读!

Related Reads

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: A Nuanced Competitive Reshuffle The launch of OUSD, a new stablecoin initiative, has complex implications for the stablecoin market. For Circle (CRCL), the initial 15-20% stock drop reflects legitimate competitive concerns but is not a "death sentence." Circle retains deep liquidity, existing integrations, and first-mover advantages. A potential restructuring or termination of its Coinbase partnership could even double its net revenue in the short term, providing more competitive freedom. However, OUSD, backed by Stripe's engineering and product strengths, could become the default stablecoin within the Stripe ecosystem for new adopters, challenging USDC's position. OUSD does not solve the core barrier for corporate adoption: it remains a credit exposure to its issuer (likely a Bridge-related entity), which, like Circle, is not an investment-grade entity. Large banks and asset managers could still capture the most lucrative enterprise use cases. Circle must accelerate its payment/fintech product development and consider defensive M&A. For Tether, OUSD targets a different market segment. Tether will continue focusing on distribution channels not prioritized by Stripe or Circle. Its market share may decline over time, but within a significantly growing total market. Paxos faces the greatest pressure. OUSD undermines the key selling points of its USDG stablecoin, and Paxos's regulatory advantages may diminish as frameworks mature. This poses a more existential challenge, explaining Paxos's recent shift back to its brokerage-as-a-service business.

marsbit17m ago

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

marsbit17m ago

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Reshuffle

This article analyzes the impact of the newly announced stablecoin OUSD, backed by a consortium including Stripe, on major incumbents like Circle (USDC), Tether (USDT), and Paxos (USDG). For Circle, the announcement is not a simple negative. While the initial market reaction was rational, it's not a "death sentence." Circle retains deep liquidity, existing integrations, and first-mover advantage. A potential restructuring or termination of its exclusive revenue-sharing deal with Coinbase could even near-double its net income in the short term, providing more competitive flexibility. However, within the Stripe ecosystem, OUSD, with its strong engineering and product focus, could become the default choice, displacing USDC for new integrations. Circle must accelerate its own fintech product development and consider defensive M&A. OUSD does not directly threaten Tether's core markets, which focus on different distribution channels. Tether's market share may decline over time but within a significantly growing overall market. Paxos faces the greatest pressure. OUSD undermines the primary value proposition of its USDG stablecoin, and Paxos's regulatory advantages may erode as frameworks mature, posing a more existential challenge. This explains Paxos's recent strategic pivot towards brokerage-as-a-service. A fundamental unresolved issue for enterprise adoption remains: if issued by a Bridge-related entity, OUSD, like USDC, still represents a credit exposure to a non-investment-grade issuer, unless a parent company guarantee is provided. Large banks and asset managers entering the space later could still compete for the most lucrative enterprise use cases.

链捕手18m ago

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Reshuffle

链捕手18m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片