ETH如何「生财有道」?一览16个20%以上APR的收益策略

Odaily星球日报Published on 2025-01-07Last updated on 2025-01-07

Abstract

包括通过 wstETH、杠杆 weETH、AERO 挖矿等策略。

原文作者:Stephen, 加密 KOL
原文编译:Felix, PANews


目前可持续且可扩展的 ETH 收益率 >20% 并不常见,加密 KOL Stephen 盘点了让年利率(APR)保持在 20% 以上的策略。


wstETH


wstETH 可以说是史上最受欢迎、且最具竞争力和可扩展性的策略。即使在最低迷的熊市,APR 通常也在 8% 到 30% 之间。


wstETH 工作原理是利用 ETH 的质押收益率(约 3% )来抵消借贷 ETH 的成本(约 2% )。


有四个进行操作的绝佳地方:

  • Morpho Labs
  • Aave
  • Compound Growth
  • Euler Labs

目前这一策略的 APR 约在 26 % 至 46% 之间。当然,您可以使用 Contango 自动利用这些头寸来生成 TANGO 积分、OP emissions 等。

ETH如何「生财有道」?一览16个20%以上APR的收益策略


杠杆 weETH


该策略和上一个策略一样,只是该策略还有资格获得各种积分和 emissions。因此,该策略的平均收益略高:

  • ether.fi 积分
  • Veda 积分
  • LRT 2 积分
  • EigenLayer 程序性奖励(如 $LRT 2)

三个蓝筹货币市场是杠杆化的最佳场所:

  • Compound Growth
  • Aave
  • Morpho Labs

在考虑 LRTsquared、EtherFi S 4 和 Veda 积分之前,APR 在 22% 到 36% 不等。考虑积分后的实际收益率可能在 50% 以上。
注意:尽管目前 Morpho 的 APR 排第一,但前三大协议的差距不大,因此在它们之间进行对冲通常可以让你获得最具竞争力和持续高的 APR(可以对冲不稳定的借款利率)。

ETH如何「生财有道」?一览16个20%以上APR的收益策略


AERO 挖矿


Compound Growth 目前正向用户支付以 cbETH、ETH 和 wstETH 为抵押借入 AERO 的费用。


同时在 Aerodrome 上可以通过投票获得 AERO 约 200% APR 。


当然,清算贷款价值比(LLTV)是 65% ,所以来看一些合理的仓位:
贷款价值比(LTV) 50% 
相对 AERO 清算增幅: 30% 
ETH 抵押总收益率: 100% APR
贷款价值比 25% 
相对 AERO 清算增幅: 160% 
ETH 抵押总收益率: 54% APR

ETH如何「生财有道」?一览16个20%以上APR的收益策略


ETH如何「生财有道」?一览16个20%以上APR的收益策略


ynETH


Spectra 是 Pendle 的竞争对手,尽管最近凭借其 USR 池最近引发了一些热潮,但是其推出的 ynETH 池也提供了一定的市场机会。


0 boost 时,APR 为 33% ,有 boost 的情况下,APR 可以达到 100% 。


值得注意的是,如果 Spectra 成为真正的竞争对手,持有 / 锁定 SPECTRA 可能会有很好的效果,因此增加一些提高收益的风险敞口可能并不糟糕。

ETH如何「生财有道」?一览16个20%以上APR的收益策略


gmETH


这个策略有些争议,因为 gmETH 曾经历过本金损失。


gmETH 就是所谓的「交易对手库(Counter Party Vault)」,当 GMX 上的交易者获得超额收益时,其会相对于 ETH 下跌。反之亦然,也是以往常态。


您可以在 Dolomite 实现此策略,目前年利率约为 30% ,历史平均年利率约为 20% 。

ETH如何「生财有道」?一览16个20%以上APR的收益策略


GMWETH(Umami)


此策略与上一个头寸非常相似,但它对冲了大部分 delta 和风险。
虽然目前 APR 约为 16.5% ,但从历史上看相当高(约 50% ),在中期的未来,平均 APR 将超过 20% 。

ETH如何「生财有道」?一览16个20%以上APR的收益策略


ETH如何「生财有道」?一览16个20%以上APR的收益策略


pufETH


尽管最近竞争更激烈,pufETH 长期以来一直是一个金矿。该 LP(30 bps 费用等级)的历史上 APR 在 15-50% 之间,且再平衡程度极低。
这就像是一颗隐藏的宝石,虽然不会永远存在。

ETH如何「生财有道」?一览16个20%以上APR的收益策略


ETH如何「生财有道」?一览16个20%以上APR的收益策略


可持续且可扩展的 ETH 收益率 >20% 并不常见。


您可以在 D 2 LFinance 等地方找到一些较小但仍然令人难以置信的机会,但当涉及到更小的头寸以获得更小的收益时,让它们过于公开是自欺欺人的。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

"Lean Ethereum" Long-Term Roadmap Unveiled by Vitalik Buterin On July 5, 2026, Vitalik Buterin published the "Lean Ethereum" roadmap, positioning it as Ethereum's third major evolution following the Merge. This multi-year, multi-phase upgrade aims to fundamentally transform Ethereum's core protocol through staged network upgrades extending to 2029. Key goals include achieving 1 gigagas per second L1 throughput (a massive increase from the current ~32 TPS), near-instant finality, and quantum-resistant cryptography. The plan involves transitioning Ethereum's security model from full transaction re-execution by all nodes to native verification via recursive STARK proofs. A major proposed change is replacing the EVM with a proof-friendly architecture like RISC-V or leanISA, though this remains a point of contention, especially with L2s like Arbitrum favoring alternatives like WASM. Other planned upgrades include a restructured state model with a large, cheap "warehouse" storage layer to drastically reduce fees for migrated applications, multi-dimensional gas pricing, and a new focus on making privacy a first-class, native protocol feature. While the roadmap significantly raises Ethereum's long-term technical ceiling, analysts note it does not directly address ETH's mid-term token economics or value capture. The plan's multi-year timeline means near-term price impact will likely depend on observable progress milestones, such as the successful deployment of the upcoming Glamsterdam gas limit increase, growth in L2 activity and blob usage, and trends in L1 fee revenue and ETH burn.

链捕手1h ago

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

链捕手1h ago

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

In just 11 days, Bun's founder Jarred Sumner used Anthropic's Claude AI models to rewrite its million lines of code from Zig to Rust. This move sparked significant controversy, particularly from Zig's creator, Andrew Kelley, who publicly criticized Sumner's engineering practices and the decision to use AI for such a massive rewrite. Bun, a high-performance JavaScript/TypeScript runtime and rival to Node.js, was originally written in Zig. After Anthropic acquired Bun, the team encountered persistent stability and memory safety bugs in the Zig codebase. These issues, combined with Zig's strict policy against LLM-generated code, led to the decision to rewrite in Rust. The rewrite was executed using Claude AI tools at an estimated API cost of $165,000, dramatically reducing the expected time and financial cost. Andrew Kelley's response was scathing. He blamed the original bugs on poor engineering habits, calling Bun's Zig code a collection of "hacks on top of hacks." He expressed relief that Bun was no longer associated with Zig, fearing it would misrepresent the language and attract low-quality, AI-generated contributions. The tech community is divided; some view Kelley's critique as unprofessional, while others see it as a defense of engineering integrity. A major concern about the AI-driven rewrite is the resulting code quality. The translation from Zig left approximately 27,000 lines of unsafe Rust code, raising fears about long-term maintainability and technical debt. The debate centers on whether this project is a milestone in AI-assisted development or a future maintenance nightmare.

marsbit2h ago

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

marsbit2h ago

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin and Now AI: Cango's "What Not to Do" Strategy Cango, a Chinese auto finance platform that went public on the NYSE in 2018, is undergoing its third major transformation. After selling its entire auto business in 2024, it pivoted to become a large-scale Bitcoin miner, acquiring 50 exahash of mining rigs from Bitmain. However, its true goal was never Bitcoin, but owning and controlling energy infrastructure. Now, Cango is pivoting again. While most listed Bitcoin miners are leasing power to giant hyperscalers for AI training clusters, Cango is taking the opposite path. It has launched an AI inference subsidiary called EcoHash, focusing not on training but on distributed inference. The company's strategy hinges on the insight that over 70% of mining industry power is controlled by small, independent sites (10-50 MW), which are too small for hyperscalers but ideal for low-latency AI inference. Cango aims to partner with these small operators, providing the AI technology, customers, and financing through its EcoLink software layer, which can distribute workloads across sites for reliability. Cango maintains a hybrid model, running roughly 31.7 EH/s of Bitcoin mining for cash flow while aggressively cleaning its balance sheet—slashing long-term debt by 94.5% to $30.6 million and raising $75 million for its AI venture. Its first AI deployment will be at a 50 MW site in Georgia. The strategy faces skepticism, given the high costs of converting mining sites and the potential for an AI bubble. However, Cango's leadership believes discipline around "what not to do"—avoiding direct competition with hyperscalers in training—positions it to capture the long-tail demand for distributed AI inference power.

Foresight News2h ago

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

Foresight News2h ago

Strategy's Bitcoin Sales Cap Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion: A Detail the Market Overlooked

The article discusses how MicroStrategy's potential Bitcoin sales go far beyond the announced $1.25 billion "reserve-building capacity." It clarifies a key distinction in the company's "BTC Monetization Program": selling Bitcoin to *build* a new dollar reserve (the $1.25B cap) versus selling to *replenish* the existing USD Reserve after it's used for expenses like preferred share dividends. The recent $216M BTC sale for dividend payments was a "replenishment," leaving the headline $1.25B building quota untouched. The plan actually outlines three potential funding pools from BTC sales: 1) Building the reserve ($1.25B cap), 2) Covering preferred share/ debt costs (no specified cap), and 3) Funding buyback programs (up to $20B). This means the structured sales potential exceeds $30 billion, not including uncapped replenishment sales. The piece argues this marks MicroStrategy's shift from a passive "buy-and-hold" Bitcoin proxy to an actively managed entity using BTC as a balance-sheet tool to manage its complex capital structure (common stock, preferred shares, debt, reserve). This creates new dynamics and potential conflicts, as actions benefiting one part (e.g., selling BTC to pay dividends) may pressure another (e.g., undermining the "never sell" narrative). Investors must now parse the company's specific terminology ("build" vs. "replenish") to understand the true scope of future BTC sales, which is significantly larger than the market initially perceived.

marsbit2h ago

Strategy's Bitcoin Sales Cap Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion: A Detail the Market Overlooked

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片