RFK Jr.暂停白宫竞标给Polymarket带来混乱

币界网Published on 2024-08-23Last updated on 2024-08-23

币界网报道:

简单的“是”或“否”仍然可能很复杂。随着这位独立总统候选人暂停竞选美国总统,小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪言论的细微差别在今天的Polymarket上引发了明显的混乱和剧烈的价格波动。

Polymarket的赌注总额超过30万美元,取决于这位肯尼迪政治王朝的后裔是否会“周五退出”。如果肯尼迪“正式宣布退出”11月那场势均力敌的选举,市场将决定“是的”。

就在肯尼迪发表讲话时,由于这位候选人坚称他没有完全退出竞选,这些可能性急剧下降到6%。相反,肯尼迪表示,他正在亚利桑那州等战场州的选票上删除自己的名字,这可能会影响选举的最终结果。

暴跌发生在几分钟内,因为Polymarket的交易员们预测,肯尼迪周五在亚利桑那州发表讲话前不久有90%的可能性会退出。有一次,这些几率攀升到99%,然后暴跌。

肯尼迪说:“我不会终止我的竞选活动,我只是暂停它。”。“我们的民意调查一直显示,如果留在战场州的选票上,我可能会把选举交给民主党人,我在最关乎生存的问题上与他们意见相左。”

随着混乱的蔓延,Polymarket交易员争论是否应该以每种方式解决赌注。与此同时,肯尼迪今天辍学的可能性稳步上升。尽管如此,在撰写本文时,市场仍倾向于“否”,肯尼迪退出的可能性为41%。

“这他妈的是怎么回事?”Polymarket用户Donkov问道,他买卖了肯尼迪在一小时内至少10次退出的股票。

Polymarket用户GreedyMacFear补充道:“我在看直播,我不知道这个人想说什么。”。“所以,我卖掉了所有的‘不’。”

Polymarket对有争议的结果并不陌生。该平台今年经历了几次,包括6月份的68万美元市场,这取决于所谓的全链互操作性协议LayerZero是否确实进行了空投。

该市场存在争议,将结果留给UMA,UMA是一种使用代币解决争议的DeFi协议。UMA代币持有者被指示通过UMA称为“去中心化真相机器”的过程,对实际发生的结果进行投票

一些Polymarket用户发布了新闻媒体的文章,支持他们的赌注。例如,福克斯新闻的一篇文章称肯尼迪“放弃了入主白宫的计划”,而路透社的一篇报道称肯尼迪“周五放弃了竞选”

在撰写本文时,关于肯尼迪的Polymarket竞赛尚未引起争议。值得注意的是,这个问题也没有得到解决,比赛将于周五午夜结束。

由Ryan Ozawa编辑。

Related Reads

Crypto Payment Cards with $1.5 Billion Monthly Transaction Volume, Stuck in the 1990s

Monthly crypto payment card transaction volume has reached $15 billion, but the industry's development stage is comparable to debit cards in the 1990s, before they became a mainstream financial staple. A key limitation is the lack of established daily financial relationships, such as direct salary deposits and recurring bill payments, with crypto wallets. Despite annualized transaction volumes of approximately $18 billion, the market is concentrated and immature. The leading provider, RedotPay, commands over half the market share. User adoption is heavily skewed towards emerging markets like Bangladesh, India, and Nigeria, where access to USD and stable financial services is limited, rather than developed economies. The sector features four primary business models: 1) Card-issuing infrastructure providers, 2) Exchange-affiliated cards for user retention, 3) Decentralized wallet/DeFi cards with self-custody but high complexity, and 4) Stablecoin-focused digital banks, which dominate transaction volume by offering integrated financial services. The article argues that a pure payment functionality is insufficient for long-term success, mirroring the historical trajectory of traditional debit cards. Future winners will need to: 1) Control the upstream flow of funds, 2) Secure defensible niches in underserved markets, and 3) Most crucially, build core account relationships that integrate into users' daily financial lives. Without this evolution, crypto cards risk remaining niche prepaid tools rather than becoming universal financial infrastructure.

Foresight News6m ago

Crypto Payment Cards with $1.5 Billion Monthly Transaction Volume, Stuck in the 1990s

Foresight News6m ago

$7.8 Billion in Theft and Losses Reveals the Truth: Security Costs Have Become an Unavoidable Liquidity Tax for DeFi

"7.8 Billion in Thefts Reveals the Truth: Security Costs Have Become DeFi's Unavoidable 'Liquidity Tax'" A summary of Q2 2026 data reveals that security risks are now a fundamental capital cost in DeFi, directly impacting user returns and liquidity decisions. DeFiLlama recorded 88 hacking incidents with quantified losses totaling $780.3 million in Q2. April was the worst month with $644.8 million lost. DeFi protocol attacks accounted for $735.8 million, while cross-chain bridge exploits resulted in $354.4 million in losses (note: some event categorizations overlap). Cumulatively, DeFi hacks have reached $7.85 billion, with bridge losses at $3.26 billion. The quarter highlighted two primary risk categories: high-value infrastructure vulnerabilities (e.g., bridges, oracles, admin keys) causing massive single losses, and more frequent contract logic bugs. This signals a critical market shift: from post-incident analysis to preemptive pricing of risk. Users and liquidity providers now implicitly factor in the security of the entire asset pathway—not just pool APY—into their decisions. This hidden "risk premium" manifests through wider spreads, higher liquidity incentives, and capital migration towards perceived safer routes. Cross-chain bridge risks, responsible for over $353 million in Q2 losses, exemplify this change. Asset routing credibility is now part of the transaction. Following incidents like KelpDAO and THORChain, markets are demanding safer bridges, asset insurance, and clearer risk disclosure, increasing the cost of capital for riskier pathways. Consequently, security spending is transforming from a defensive cost into a core distribution cost for attracting liquidity. Protocols must invest more in audits, bug bounties, real-time monitoring, and insurance to remain competitive. Users are increasingly demanding transparency about fund flow paths, associated risks, and contingency plans. The key indicators for the industry's direction will be whether capital continues consolidating in trusted channels, if projects delay launches for enhanced audits, if insurance premiums rise, and if aggregators start displaying security risk metrics. Q2 2026 may be remembered not just as a bad period, but as the point when DeFi underwent a fundamental asset risk repricing, where security became a persistent,隐性 tax on all on-chain activity.

Foresight News34m ago

$7.8 Billion in Theft and Losses Reveals the Truth: Security Costs Have Become an Unavoidable Liquidity Tax for DeFi

Foresight News34m ago

Breaking News: The "Worker's Edition" Claude 5 Is Here, Everyone Can Use It

BREAKING: Claude Sonnet 5, dubbed "Fennec," is now the default model for all Free and Pro users. This mid-tier model boasts the strongest Agent capabilities in the Sonnet line yet, with performance rivaling the flagship Opus 4.8. It features autonomous planning and can utilize browser and terminal tools—capabilities previously exclusive to costly, large models. Key benchmarks highlight significant gains over its predecessor, Sonnet 4.6, in reasoning, tool use, coding, and knowledge work. Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% on SWE-bench Pro (surpassing GPT-5.5's 58.6%), 80.4% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, and 57.4% on Humanity's Last Exam (just 0.5% behind Opus 4.8). It even slightly outperforms Opus 4.8 in some knowledge tasks. Anthropic positions it as delivering ~90% of Opus's capability at a fraction of the cost. Pricing is aggressive: a limited-time promotional rate of $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens (reverting to $3/$15 after August 31). This undercuts Opus 4.8 ($5/$25) and GPT-5.5 ($5/$30). However, a new tokenizer may increase token counts by 1.0-1.35x, affecting final costs post-promotion. Notably, Sonnet 5 excels in security, with a mere 0.93% browser injection attack success rate, outperforming Mythos 5 and Opus 4.8. Its prompt injection defense matches Opus 4.8 at 0.19%. Launching amid uncertainty around the region-restricted Fable 5, Sonnet 5 is globally available. It targets the mid-market, offering near-flagship performance at a competitive price, effectively lowering the barrier for multi-Agent development and presenting a compelling alternative for cost-conscious developers.

marsbit50m ago

Breaking News: The "Worker's Edition" Claude 5 Is Here, Everyone Can Use It

marsbit50m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片