Nexera销毁3250万个代币-最新加密货币新闻

币界网Published on 2024-08-08Last updated on 2024-08-08

币界网报道:

去中心化金融(DeFi)协议Nexera最近在一次黑客事件后焚烧了3250万个NXRA代币,这是他们加强安全战略的一部分。区块链安全公司PeckShieldAlert证实,这些代币已永久停止流通。

内容隐藏1 Nexera如何回应?2袭击期间发生了什么?3具体措施和建议

Nexera是如何回应的?

Nexera的官方X账户披露了为应对黑客攻击而采取的多项措施。他们的技术调查证实,智能合约是不妥协的。尽管如此,仍有价值约44万美元的NXRA代币被确定为已泄露。因此,Nexera冻结了黑客钱包中的3250万个NXRA代币,以防止进一步的损害。访问COINTURK FINANCE获取最新的金融和商业新闻。

通过销毁这些代币,Nexera旨在稳定其生态系统。该行动确保被盗和冻结的代币不会进入市场或进行交易,从而最大限度地减少其对市场的影响。

袭击期间发生了什么?

8月7日,Nexera遭遇安全漏洞,导致150万美元的加密资产被盗,其中包括NXRA代币。这次袭击是影响多个项目和协议的协同攻击的一部分。

黑客窃取了约4700万个NXRA代币,价值176万美元,其中一些用于以太坊(ETH),另一些则转移到BNB链。Nexera报告估计总损失为150万美元。该协议澄清说,没有必要发行新的NXRA令牌,因为现有的令牌地址保持不变。

用户被敦促避免交易NXRA代币。在攻击者与与黑客链接的地址进行交互后,KuCoin和MEXC等交易所暂停了服务。其他交易所也被通知采取类似的预防措施。

具体措施和建议

事件的关键措施和建议包括:

    立即冻结受损的代币,以防止进一步的市场影响。进行彻底的技术调查,以确保智能合约的完整性。与主要交易所协调,及时暂停相关服务。建议用户在调查期间不要进行交易。

这一安全漏洞发生在印度加密货币交易所WazirX发生类似事件几周后,该交易所发生了超过2.3亿美元的失窃事件,这是2024年第二大加密货币攻击事件。

您可以在Telegram、Twitter(X)和Coinmarketcap上关注我们的新闻。免责声明:本文所含信息不构成投资建议。投资者应该意识到加密货币具有高波动性,因此存在风险,应该进行自己的研究。

Related Reads

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbit3h ago

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbit3h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbit6h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbit6h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbit9h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbit9h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片