开启双位数反弹行情,比特币领涨反转行情一触即发?

深潮Published on 2024-08-07Last updated on 2024-08-07

在金融市场风险偏好有所回暖的刺激下,市场情绪被提振,加密市场大举反弹。

撰文:Nancy,PANews

作为此次全球股市暴跌的推手,日本股市其间两度触发熔断机制,其央行副行长内田真一今日(8 月 7 日)在此次日本历史股灾后首次发声安抚市场称,如果金融市场不稳定,日本央行不会提高政策利率。与此同时,美国经济指标的改善也缓解了经济衰退疑虑,多头情绪有所释放,美股企稳反弹。在金融市场风险偏好有所回暖的刺激下,市场情绪被提振,加密市场大举反弹。

反弹行情加持,交易量新高抄底资金入场

市场风险偏好情绪的转好在一定程度上缓解了投资者的不安情绪。lternative 数据显示,今日(8 月 7 日)恐慌与贪婪指数为 29,较昨日市场情绪恐慌情绪已趋缓,但市场担忧情绪犹存。

加密市场在强势反弹下收复部分失地,总市值一举反弹回攻至 2 万亿美元以上。CoinGecko 数据显示,加密货币总市值为 2.1 万亿美元,其中 BTC 市占率为 52.4%,创 2021 年 4 月以来新高,ETH 市占率为 14.2%。

而币安行情显示,截至发文,比特币价格一度强力反弹至 57000 美元以上,较这轮暴跌行情低点最高上涨 16.9%;以太坊则较低点上涨了 21.1%,最高触及超 2500 美元。除此之外,Solana 也上演了一波较为强势的反弹行情,较低点涨幅达 37.9%,且 TradingView 数据显示,截至发文,SOL/ETH 比率还达到 0.0599,创下历史新高。

同时,加密市场在此期间的交易量也不断创新高。Dune 数据显示,DEX 的日交易量在 8 月 5 日超过 202 亿美元,创历史第三高记录,前两次记录为硅谷银行挤兑(231 亿美元)和 2021 年 5 月的闪电崩盘(228 亿美元);且 Blockchain.com 数据显示,比特币在 8 月 6 日的交易量还创下减半后的新高,交易额超 11.4 亿美元。

高交易量背后,有不少机构和巨鲸趁机抄底。加密分析师 Ali 昨日在 X 平台发文称,从交易所流出量的激增和交易所持有的 BTC 供应量的减少可以看出,在过去的 48 小时内,比特币巨鲸们收购了超过 30,000 枚 BTC,价值约合 16.2 亿美元;据 lookonchain 监测,当市场因崩溃而恐慌性抛售的时候,拥有 15.7 亿美元资产的实体「7 Siblings」在底部悄悄买入 56,093 枚 ETH(1.29 亿美元),平均购买价格为 2,305 美元。且 5 个巨鲸地址也在此期间累计买入 144,071 枚 ETH(约合 3.3 亿美元);@ai_9684xtpa 监测,Amaranth Foundation 创始人 James Fickel 在链上以 2523 美元均价买入 4336 枚 ETH(约 1094 万美元);IntoTheBlock 发文指出,持有 1000 至 10000 枚 BTC 的钱包地址在近期价格下跌中表现出信心,持续增加持有量。

另外,机构数字资产经纪商 FalconX 也发推表示,机构正在本次暴跌中逢低买入,其中在 8 月 7 日的观测中注意到几乎所有投资者都是是净买家,包括自营交易部门(买方总流量的 57%)、对冲基金(63%)、风险基金(61%)和零售聚合商(72%),「上周低于 50% 的买入 / 卖出比率今天已超过 50%」。其中,比特币仍是最大的加密资产,交易量是 ETH 的 2.8 倍,这两者的交易量是山寨币的两倍多。

反弹还是反转?市场担忧过度但短期内仍需谨慎

对于本轮全球股市的抛售潮,大多认为是市场情绪反应过度带来的恐慌式下跌。随着全球金融市场的回暖,本轮加密行情有所好转背后究竟是技术反弹还是市场反转?

Dragonfly 合伙人 Rob Hadick 认为,市场短期内可能仍会有痛苦,但中长期前景看涨。他解释称,本周日元套利交易带来的重大去杠杆化事件预计不会持续超过本周,但仍面临上述事件引发的某种传染风险,日本进行金融干预的可能性更高,将有助于抵御一些风险。同时某些美国经济数据指标的担忧被夸大了,且大多数明智的资金都认为这些担忧被过度抛售,预计股票将在风险偏好回升时强劲反弹,但紧急降息不太可能发生,这将市场对杰克逊霍尔会议前的恐慌情绪。且伊朗似乎正在收回其最具破坏性的言论,应该能够避免大规模冲突。未来几个月(不到一年)内,市场将迎来新的量化宽松政策、大量降息,以及最终恢复加速的商业周期增长等。

且他还补充道,非加密原生投资者将在很长一段时间不会回归,原因是这部分用户在长尾资产上过度杠杆化。接下来流动性回归可能会集中在主流的加密货币上,大多数山寨币可能永远无法(或接近)达到历史高点,尤其是没有强大的产品市场契合度(PMF)或长期预期的情况下。

加密投资机构 QCP Capital 也同样表示,关于紧急降息的讨论……这不太可能,因为这将严重损害美联储的信誉,加剧市场恐慌以及人们对即将到来的衰退的信念。该机构认为,在美联储和日本银行政策明朗之前,资产价格可能会继续波动,市场也仍将保持动荡。随着价格暴跌,现在可能是时候开始考虑积累比特币和以太坊现货了。

Real Vision 创始人 Raoul Pal 则表示,这是一次剧烈的洗盘和风险杠杆的重置,强劲的上涨将是 2024/2025 年的总体特点,未来一周是 2024/2025 年最后一次入场或完全建仓的机会。但流动性 / 政策反应需要时间,每个政府和央行都希望美元贬值、利率降低,所以他们可能倾向于让这种情况持续一段时间然后再停止。美联储最终的降息也将带来美元走弱的时期,这有助于形成宏观夏季 / 秋季。现在市场处于极度恐惧区,坚持住,制定一个适合你的风险承受能力和时间范围的计划。保持安全,等待的人会得到好运。市场从来都不容易,牛市的任务就是试图让你失望,这一切都会过去的。

「自日元套利交易开始解除以来,比特币经历了显著的价格波动,未平仓合约的减少和负资金费率表明比特币横盘整理的可能性更大。而预计央行的很快干预将使得比特币在当前价格水平上显得具有吸引力。」彭博社加密分析师 Jamie Coutts 如是表示。

Coinbase 研究员 David Duong 则表示,周二的市场状况表明,在中心化交易所交易活动增加的情况下,存在逼空的可能性。其认为市场短期内仍将动荡不安,但空头可能在这里受到挤压,这可能导致市场在未来几天内反弹。近期加密市场的下跌并不代表新的长期趋势或市场周期的开始,相反当前的抛售与我们在 2024 年第三季度采取的防御性策略以及对 2024 年第四季度更具建设性的展望一致。

另外,CryptoQuant 创始人兼首席执行官 Ki Young Ju 也在 X 平台发文称,只要比特币可以保持在 45000 美元以上,就可能在一年内再次突破历史最高点。虽然现在一些指标显示出看跌信号。但其实仍有可能反弹,因此需要观察它是否会在这个水平上维持一两周。如果持续时间较长,熊市风险就会增大,如果持续时间超过一个月,复苏可能会很困难。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit2h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit3h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

411 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片