Odaily编辑部投资操作全记录(7月26日)

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-07-26Last updated on 2024-07-26

Abstract

行情多空双爆,ETH疲软、SOL强势,哪些交易机会浮现?

本新栏目为 Odaily 编辑部成员真实投资经历分享,不接受任何商务广告,不构成投资建议(因为本司同事都很擅长亏钱),旨在为读者扩充视角、丰富信源,欢迎加入 Odaily 社群(微信@Odaily 2018 ,Telegram 交流群X 官方账号)交流吐槽。

Odaily编辑部投资操作全记录(7月26日)

推荐人:Asher(X:@Asher_ 0210 

简介:短线合约、低市值山寨长线埋伏、链游打金、撸毛党

分享:

1.BTC: 67000 做空,目标 63000 ,止损 68000 ,认为这是通往历史新高的最后一波回调。

2.上次山寨币推荐回顾:TAO、INJ 短线低点做多都很舒服,特别是 TAO,特别强势,可以反复低点做多,短线做波段,几个参考的止盈点: 330 , 360 , 400 (短线合约具体操作方式:比如手里的这单,我在 313 开的多, 330 会平一半仓位,目前看明显强势会在 360 再平部分仓位,剩下仓位或继续冲高到 400 就全平了,或跌回 330 也会都平了,等待下次机会继续做多。)。INJ 几个参考止盈点: 29、 33、 38 。

3.本次山寨币推荐:整体思路不变,短线看回调,只做 TAO INJ 这样强势币的短线合约(只低位做多不做空);按照剧本 BTC 回调到位后,会买 ETH、BNB、PEPE、FLOKI、TAO、INJ。

Odaily编辑部投资操作全记录(7月26日)

推荐人:Wenser(X:@wenser 2010 

简介:交易所卸载不看玩家,稳定压倒一切

分享:

1.之前提到的 KAMA 后续又涨了 3-4 倍,恭喜跟上的小伙伴,这是你们应得的。

2.最近看到有朋友推荐哈里斯概念币 WWFWW(CA:0x274d181267ff7607e1ebc86fa13b737509072ae2),目前来看哈里斯不像之前大家想象的那么弱,When We Fight We Win 的竞选口号也算有点力度,Key 少量参与下看看。

3.看到 BEVM 也发了个比特币 Layer 2 Sats Network,可以看看后续有没有参与的空间。

4.有人说 PolyMarket(https://polymarket.com/)下半年可能发币,虽然对这种收手续费的平台来说发不发币区别不大,但发币之后的天花板相对高一点点,最近可以多多交互,尤其是参与下美国大选板块的相关下注,赢了更好,输了就当交互了(注:没空投别打我啊,我也是听说的)。

推荐人:南枳(X:@Assassin_Malvo

简介:链上玩家,数据分析师,除了 NFT 什么都玩

分享:

1. “灰度卖 ETH 关我 SOL 什么事”成立,SOL 即将回到近期高点,已在 MA 55 完成小仓高倍接单,计划拿到八月,然后等待降息前“最后一跌”。

2. Solana Meme 行情有所回暖,聪明钱和博弈重点文章已发布,准备摒弃钻石手风格,开始 jeet。

往期记录

7 月 24 日

7 月 17 日

7 月 19 日

推荐阅读

Matrixport 投研:日铸币数据回升,加密市场大趋势向好

Bitcoin 2024 大会首日:特朗普元素遍布会场,牛市气氛浓厚

Related Reads

Wash's Jackson Hole Debut: Bidding Farewell to 'Forward Guidance', Reshaping Fed Discipline Amidst the Squeeze Between AI and Inflation

In his first Jackson Hole speech, new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh signaled a significant shift in monetary policy communication. He declared that "forward guidance," a tool heavily used since the financial crisis, has outlived its usefulness in normal times and should be retired. He cautioned that over-reliance on it can distort market signals and constrain the Fed's flexibility. Instead, Warsh emphasized a return to data-dependence and decision-making discipline. Warsh outlined seven key principles to guide policy: anchoring the 2% inflation target, pursuing the employment mandate, using short-term rates as the primary tool, acknowledging the importance of money, and maintaining purposeful, restrained communication. He stressed that policy should focus on trends, not single data points. On the current economic outlook, Warsh noted that the labor market is consistent with full employment but inflation remains "far above" the Fed's target. He highlighted that over half of the PCE basket's components are still rising above 3% annually. While acknowledging AI's transformative potential for productivity and capital allocation, he admitted its full economic impact remains uncertain and is not a factor in current policy decisions. His core message was a commitment to policy discipline rather than pre-set decisions. Warsh stated the Fed's primary focus must be on restoring price stability, vowing, "We still have work to do," until there is clear evidence inflation is moving decisively toward 2%. He concluded by framing effective monetary policy as crucial for economic prosperity and U.S. global leadership.

Odaily星球日报15m ago

Wash's Jackson Hole Debut: Bidding Farewell to 'Forward Guidance', Reshaping Fed Discipline Amidst the Squeeze Between AI and Inflation

Odaily星球日报15m ago

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

Blockstream, a major Bitcoin solutions developer, has introduced a draft proposal for a new quantum-resistant digital signature scheme called SHRINCS. The scheme aims to protect Bitcoin transactions from potential attacks by quantum computers while aiming to maintain network throughput. This marks the second technical proposal for Bitcoin quantum defense in recent days, following a similar initiative from StarkWare. A quantum attack on blockchain typically involves deriving a private key from a public one. Currently considered computationally infeasible, quantum algorithms could potentially solve this problem far more efficiently. This threat presents two primary scenarios: an attacker could target addresses where the public key is already exposed, or intercept a transaction before it is confirmed, extract the public key, derive the private key, and replace the transaction. Blockstream's SHRINCS is designed to counter the latter, "in-flight" attack scenario. The SHRINCS signature is built upon the SHA-256 hash function, the same one already used in Bitcoin mining, allowing developers to leverage well-tested, familiar mechanisms. A key design goal was to preserve network capacity. Blockstream estimates Bitcoin could process about three transactions per second using SHRINCS, compared to the current rate of roughly seven, noting that some alternative quantum-resistant schemes could reduce throughput to as low as 0.36 transactions per second. Currently, the security proof for SHRINCS is pending, and the software has not been audited or deemed ready for production. However, Blockstream conducted tests with such transactions on its Liquid sidechain in March. Over the past year, Bitcoin developers have been actively exploring paths to migrate to post-quantum cryptography, a priority across the broader crypto market, underscored by significant investments into securing the leading cryptocurrency.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

When autonomous AI agents behave unpredictably and cause harm, determining legal liability is complex. Currently, there is no specific federal AI agent liability law, so existing legal frameworks are applied. The AI agent itself cannot be held liable, as it is not a legal entity. Liability typically falls on the "developer" (the maker of the AI) or the "deployer" (the user), depending on the facts and circumstances. A negligence analysis under standard tort law may apply. For instance, if a deployer gives a reckless instruction, such as demanding quick money without safety parameters, they could face significant liability, including potential criminal charges under statutes like the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. The situation is complicated by open-source models, where licenses often disclaim liability, and by the unclear division of responsibility between developers and deployers. An analogy is drawn to self-driving car accidents, where both the manufacturer and the human operator can share fault. In cases of severe harm, such as using AI to create bioweapons, liability for developers depends on jurisdiction; the EU's AI Act imposes responsibilities, while U.S. law offers less clear grounds, similar to platforms being shielded for user-generated content under Section 230. Even if Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is achieved, the expert argues against making AGI itself a legally liable entity, as it lacks personhood, assets, or a meaningful way to provide remedy for harm. Instead, accountability should rest with the responsible human or corporate entities behind the technology.

cointelegraph1h ago

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

cointelegraph1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片