一文梳理2024潜在空投

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-01-30Last updated on 2024-01-30

Abstract

牛市期间，预计还会有更多意外的TGE。

原文作者：@WagameEth

原文编译：Luccy，BlockBeats

编者按：加密研究员根据官方信息梳理了 2024 可能 TGE 的项目，BlockBeats 将原文编译如下：

一月份还未结束，但我们已经拿到了 ZKF，MANTA 空投，并且确认了 ALT，NAM，DYM，SAGA，FRAME 的空投计划。不要再问「Wen」了，答案是 2024 年。

这是今年一些相对可信的 TGE 信息。

一文梳理2024潜在空投

事先声明，首先，这只是计划，而我们知道计划往往会出现变数，所以可能会有延迟。其次，这只是最低标准，在牛市期间，预计还会有更多意外的 TGE。第三，没有谣言，没有所谓的「内部消息」，只有确认过的信息或经过深思熟虑的猜测，你可以自行查证。

以下项目已进行快照，不会详细介绍，只需等待 TGE：

Namada（@namada）、AltLayer（@alt_layer）、Dymension（@dymension）、Saga（@Sagaxyz__）、Frame（@frame_xyz）、ZKX（@zkxprotocol）、diva（@divastaking）。

Q1 项目

· Aevo（@aevoxyz）：TGE（或者更确切地说是从 RBN 进行的代币交换）计划于一月份进行。其中 16% 的 AEVO 将用于激励计划。

· Thetanuts Finance（@ThetanutsFi）：NUTS 即将上线 Coinlist。其中 2% 将在空投 S 1 发布，计划于 2024 年第一季度进行。

· zkLink（@zkLink_Official）：ZKL 预计将通过 Coinlist 出售，关于激励计划目前还没有消息。

一文梳理2024潜在空投

· ZetaChain（@zetablockchain）：ZetaChain 是 L1 链，将使用其代币作为 gas。因此，ZETA 的 TGE 日期与主网时间表相关，计划于 2024 年第一季度进行。

· MilkyWay（@milky_way_zone）：TIA 流动权益质押应用，计划在第一季度进行 TGE。

· Maverick Protocol（@mavprotocol）：MAV 已经上线，所以这不会是一个 TGE，而是第 2 轮空投（尽管他们称之为第一季度空投）。

一文梳理2024潜在空投

· Avail（@AvailProject）：AVAIL 的发布日期与团队公布的主网日期相关，主网计划于第一季度上线。

· Merkle Trade（@Merkle_Trade）：MKL 计划于第一季度 TGE。

· Taiko（@taikoxyz）：代币作为设计的一部分，因此他们的 TGE 可能与主网日期一致，计划在第一季度进行。

一文梳理2024潜在空投

· TapiocaDAO（@tapioca_dao）：TAPIOCA 预计将于 2024 年 2 月份发布。 · IntentX（@IntentX_）：TGE 计划于 2024 年第一季度进行。 · Aleo（@AleoHQ）：是 L1 链，需要 ALEO 支付 gas 费用。因此，TGE 预计将在 2024 年第一季度的主网启动前后进行。

· Kinza Finance（@kinzafinance）：KZA 预计将在 2024 年第一季度发布。

一文梳理2024潜在空投

· Nostra（@nostrafinance）：据 TempleDAO 治理论坛，NOS 预计将在第一季度发布。 ·Swell（@swellnetworkio）：目前可以通过 mint 和提供 swETH 流动性赚取「pearls」，将来有机会将其转换为 SWELL。目前计划在第一季度「末期」进行。

一文梳理2024潜在空投

· Mantle（@0x Mantle）：这不是 TGE，而是第一季度的奖励。据推测，我们会得到一些 MNT。

Q1 至 Q2 项目

· Starknet（@Starknet）：没有确认何时发 STRK，但所有证据都表明这个时间即将到来。例如，KuCoin 清理类似的代币，很可能是为了 STRK 的交易做准备。

· LayerZero Labs（@LayerZero_Labs）：ZRO 将在上半年发布。

· Gravita Protocol（@gravitaprotocol）：TGE 计划在第一季度末到第二季度初进行。

· Timeswap（@TimeswapLabs）：TIME 已经进行了预挖矿，TGE 计划在上半年进行。

· KiloEx（@KiloEx_perp）：瞄准 Q1-Q2 进行 TGE

· Lumoz（@LumozOrg）：预计 MOZ 将在 Q1-Q2 发布。根据另一位团队成员的说法，也可能是 Q2。

· Magpie Protocol（@magpieprotocol）：瞄准 2024 年进行 TGE。他们的团队表示「比你想象的要早」，我认为可能在上半年内发布。

一文梳理2024潜在空投

· Reya Labs（@Reya_xyz）：（Voltz 提供的产品）需要 REYA 作为协议设计的一部分。主网计划在 Q1 启动，但据推测，代币将在启用被动 LP 之后不久上线。

· Satori（@SatoriFinance）：用「迟到的圣诞礼物」逗弄我们，这让我觉得 TGE 将在上半年进行。

Q2 项目

· Blast（@Blast_L2）：积分可在五月兑换，因此 TGE 可能就在那个时候。

· Fyde Treasury Protocol（@FydeTreasury）：FYDE 预计将在四月至五月发布。

· Kroma（@kroma_network）：TGE 计划在六月进行。

一文梳理2024潜在空投

· ether.fi（@EtherFi）：TGE 计划于 2024 年 4 月。

Q2 至 Q3 项目

· Berachain（@berachain）：需要代币来支持其主网，因此 TGE 可能在主网上线前后进行。目前，Berachain 的服务器很疯狂，但国际助手称 TGE 可能是 Q2 或 Q2 至 Q3。

一文梳理2024潜在空投

Q2 至 Q4 项目

· Ekubo（@EkuboProtocol）：Ekubo 一直在排行榜上攀升，EKUBO 计划在 Q2-Q4 发布。

Q3 至 Q4 项目

· GRVT（@grvt_io）：GVT 计划在 2024 年 Q3-Q4 发布。

一文梳理2024潜在空投

Q4 项目

· Monad（@monad_xyz）：Monad 是 L1 链，将使用 MONAD 支付 gas 费用。因此，我们应该期待其主网上线前后 TGE。主网计划于 2024 年「后期」启动。

一文梳理2024潜在空投

暂未确定具体时间的项目

· azuro（@azuroprotocol）：AZUR TGE 预计将在今年进行，但具体时间待定。许多人猜测可能会在 Q1 发生，但我们无法确认。 · Element NFT Marketplace（@Element_Market）：目前可以通过持有其创世 NFT 来累积 ELE。关于 TGE 没有具体日期，但可以肯定是今年。

一文梳理2024潜在空投

· Orbiter Finance（@Orbiter_Finance）：确认了今年推出代币的计划，但没有进一步的细节。

· Polyhedra Network（@PolyhedraZK）：一直在暗示空投的标准，但尚未公布具体的 TGE 日期。

· Mangrove（@MangroveDAO）：计划在今年进行 TGE，甚至已经开始讨论 DAO 的治理将如何运作。

· Optimism（@Optimism）：这不是 TGE，而是更多的 OP 空投。鉴于去年已经收到了一些代币，可以肯定 2024 年将至少再获得一次。

一文梳理2024潜在空投

· Rabby Wallet（@Rabby_io）：一直在暗示已经进行了某种快照。除非是用于积分的快照。

· Aztec（@aztecnetwork）：Aztec V3 将重启为一个完全去中心化的网络（即：AZTEC）。他们的路线图显得雄心勃勃，如果一切顺利，今年有很大的机会启动主网。

原文链接

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit1h ago

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit1h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit1h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit1h ago

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit1h ago

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit1h ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit1h ago

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手1h ago