HashrateIndex: 大逆转 回望2023年比特币矿业

吴说Published on 2024-01-23Last updated on 2024-01-23

Abstract

2023 年是比特币挖矿行业的复苏年。比特币在 FTX 帝国崩溃引发的市场崩盘后以接近 17000 美元的价格跨入了 2023 年。算力价格一直处在历史最低水平(60 美元 PH/天)下方。最大的上市矿企 Core Scientific 正在经历破产清算,而许多其他矿企如 Iris、Greenidge 和 Argo 正在进行债务重组,许多其他矿企也将很快加入他们的行列。由于算力价格压缩和电费上涨,北美地区诸多矿工当时正在面不断逼近 盈亏平衡点。

2023 年是比特币挖矿行业的复苏年。比特币在 FTX 帝国崩溃引发的市场崩盘后以接近 17000 美元的价格跨入了 2023 年。算力价格一直处在历史最低水平(60 美元 PH/天)下方。最大的上市矿企 Core Scientific 正在经历破产清算,而许多其他矿企如 Iris、Greenidge 和 Argo 正在进行债务重组,许多其他矿企也将很快加入他们的行列。由于算力价格压缩和电费上涨,北美地区诸多矿工当时正在面不断逼近 盈亏平衡点。

而 2023 年着实惊艳了所有人。币价迅速从 FTX 崩溃后的最低点反弹,并在全年内实现了 149% 的上涨。算力价格在 2023 年上涨了 71%,这是自 2022 年出现 76% 跌幅后的一个极大逆转;这种复苏在很大程度上得益于交易费用牛市,这些费用主要来自铭文和序数活动,这是一种新的基于比特币的 NFT/数字收藏品标准,为矿工创造了纪录性的交易费用收入。从大多数指标来看,2023 年是 2022 年市场崩溃的完全逆转。

比特币算力倍增

2023 年,比特币算力经历了爆炸性的增长。其 7 天平均算力值从 255 EH/s 增长到 516 EH/s,增幅达到 102%,这远远超过了 2021 年和 2022 年时 18% 和 41% 的涨幅。2023 年比特币 7 天平均算力的平均值为 382 EH/s,比 2022 年时的 220 EH/s 增长了 73%。此外,2023 年比特币算力 7 天平均值和 30 天平均值均达到了历史最高水平,分别为 545 EH/s 和 510 EH/s。

2023 年是比特币挖矿行业的复苏年。比特币在 FTX 帝国崩溃引发的市场崩盘后以接近 17000 美元的价格跨入了 2023 年。算力价格一直处在历史最低水平(60 美元 PH/天)下方。最大的上市矿企 Core Scientific 正在经历破产清算,而许多其他矿企如 Iris、Greenidge 和 Argo 正在进行债务重组,许多其他矿企也将很快加入他们的行列。由于算力价格压缩和电费上涨,北美地区诸多矿工当时正在面不断逼近 盈亏平衡点。

而 2023 年着实惊艳了所有人。币价迅速从 FTX 崩溃后的最低点反弹,并在全年内实现了 149% 的上涨。算力价格在 2023 年上涨了 71%,这是自 2022 年出现 76% 跌幅后的一个极大逆转;这种复苏在很大程度上得益于交易费用牛市,这些费用主要来自铭文和序数活动,这是一种新的基于比特币的 NFT/数字收藏品标准,为矿工创造了纪录性的交易费用收入。从大多数指标来看,2023 年是 2022 年市场崩溃的完全逆转。

比特币算力倍增

2023 年,比特币算力经历了爆炸性的增长。其 7 天平均算力值从 255 EH/s 增长到 516 EH/s,增幅达到 102%,这远远超过了 2021 年和 2022 年时 18% 和 41% 的涨幅。2023 年比特币 7 天平均算力的平均值为 382 EH/s,比 2022 年时的 220 EH/s 增长了 73%。此外,2023 年比特币算力 7 天平均值和 30 天平均值均达到了历史最高水平,分别为 545 EH/s 和 510 EH/s。

图一:2022 年和 2023 年比特币算力走势对比

算力价格在 2023 年初接近历史最低水平,大多数指标均表明其或将趋势下降,要么在全年保持平稳。但与比特币一样,美元本位下算力价格在 2023 年超出了市场预期,在全年内涨幅达到了惊人的 71%,从 59.42 美元/PH/天涨至每日 101.78 美元/PH/天;相比之下,2022 年算力价格下降了 76%,从 246.85 美元/PH/天下降到 59.42 美元/PH/天。尽管如此,2023 年的平均算力价格为 74.73 美元/PH/天,而 2022 年为 123.87 美元/PH/天,降幅为 40%。

图二:美元本位下 2022 年和 2023 年算力价格走势对比

主要是由于铭文引起的交易费用波动,相比于 2022 年,算力价格在 2023 波动性更大。

2022 年的算力价格波动受币价的侵蚀影响。当比特币价格在 2022 年转向 2023 年时找到了底部,波动率降至自 2020 年 7 月以来的最低水平,并在 10 月的第一天再次降至多年低点,达到自 2018 年 11 月以来的最低点。到年底,交易费用牛市将算力价格波动推至自 2020 年 5 月以来的最高水平,当时算力价格正在对比特币的第三次减半做出反应。

图三:美元本位下算力价格 30 天波动一览

序数和铭文活动助推交易费用

2023 年最大的黑马是基于比特币的非同质化代币(NFT)的新技术标准:序数和铭文。这种在比特币上创建数字文物/艺术品的新方法,使交易费用重新成为挖矿收入的重要来源。

事实上,2023 年是比特币交易费用收益历史上排名倒数第二;矿工在 2023 年获得了 797,867,915 美元元的交易费用,仅次于 2021 年创下的 1,019,725,113 美元。交易费用占 2023 年区块奖励的 7.6%,而 2022 年占比仅有 1.5%。

图四:交易费用占比区块奖励变化一览

矿机市场触底

矿机价格在 2023 年初呈下降趋势,最终于 2023 年第四季度触底。

随着币价从 16000 美元回升,矿机价格在 2023 年第一季度时低点反弹,但在年初短暂的价格回升后,第二季度和第三季度继续呈现出下跌趋势。目前为止,下一代矿机价格在 10 月份达到低点,新一代矿机在 11 月底/12 月初时达到低点;自那时起,它们在对第四季度的算力价格反弹做出反应后反弹。

图五:不同效率等级矿机价格走势对比

仔细观察新旧矿机型号,我们可以看到随着 2023 年的推进,新一代矿机溢价率上升。下图显示了美元本位下新旧机型之间单位算力(TH)差价的百分比差异,订单量 MOQ 为 1-200。

图六:新旧矿机价格溢价及算力价格

电价轻微下跌

美国电力和燃料价格在 2022 年经历了创纪录性的通货膨胀。进入 2023 年,通货膨胀带来的冲击有所缓解,而且只针对工业用电消费者。

从 2023 年 1 月到 10 月(最新数据),美国工业用电平均价格为 81.3 美元/兆瓦时,比 2022 年同期的 83.2 美元/兆瓦时下降了 2.3%。在同一时期,2023 年商业用电平均成本从 2022 年的 128.1 美元/兆瓦时上涨了 3.1%,达到 124.3 美元/兆瓦时,而居民用电平均成本从 2022 年的 0.15 美元/千瓦时上涨到 2023 年的 0.16 美元/千瓦时。

图七:2023 年 10 月美国工业用电平均价格

托管费率下降

总体而言,2023 年比特币挖矿托管费用有所下降。

虽然没有一种通用的比特币挖矿托管方式,但费率通常会根据能源市场出现上涨或下跌。事实上,随着能源和电力价格的上涨,我们看到 2022 年的托管费用急剧上升,以至于平均全部托管费用在 2022 年第四季度达到 0.082 美元/千瓦时;当时算力价格处于 55-62 美元/PH/日的范围内,这种费率会使许多矿工无法盈利(除非他们有下一代设备)。

图八:加拿大各省平均托管费率

图九:2022 年 Q4 和 2023 年 Q4 美国各州平均托管费率对比

比特币矿业股票回暖

2023 年是比特币及其挖矿行业的复苏之年,比特币挖矿股票当然也不例外。

投资者将比特币挖矿股票视为比特币暴露的高贝塔工具,因此随着币价和算力价格反弹,比特币矿业股的反弹甚至更加强烈诸多股票在 2023 年期间看到了三位数的回报。

图十:各大矿业股票股价走势对比

由于几乎每家上市矿企在 2023 年都享受到了卓越的股价增长,这些公司的财务状况在 2023 年底比 2022 年更加健康。

图十一:各大上市矿企财务状况

2023 年是大多数上市矿企实行扩张的一年。在我们追踪的 12 家矿企中,有 7 家在全年内将其算力增加了一倍以上。Marathon 增长最为迅速,其算力从 7 EH/s 扩展到 24.7 EH/s。

图十二:各大上市矿企算力持有对比

2023 年针对比特币挖矿产业的重大监管政策及相关法案

2023 年可能是针对比特币挖矿行业提出政策建议和正式政府行动的最活跃的一年之一。在美国,2023 年的显著特点是州级机构采取了重要行动来监管这一行业,包括所谓的“挖矿权”法律,旨在(有时成功地)通过将比特币挖矿实体视为数据中心来为其建立法律保护。

图十三:2023 年对于全球比特币挖矿业的监管政策及法案

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

Behind the AI scorecards that dominate industry discussions—benchmarks like MMLU-Pro, MMMU, and MMMU-Pro—stands a Chinese-Canadian researcher: Wenhu Chen. As an assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of the TIGER Lab, Chen has become a key "exam-setter" for evaluating large language and multimodal models. Chen first gained broader recognition with MMLU-Pro, a more challenging and stable update to the popular MMLU benchmark. As top models like OpenAI’s o3 began achieving near-perfect scores on the original MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. MMLU-Pro introduced more complex reasoning questions, expanded answer choices, and filtered out ambiguous or simple items, effectively reintroducing differentiation among state-of-the-art models. His work on MMMU addressed the evaluation of multimodal models, requiring them to integrate visual information (like charts, diagrams, or tables) with textual knowledge across diverse academic subjects. Even the strongest models initially scored only around 56-59%, highlighting significant room for improvement in genuine multimodal reasoning. MMMU-Pro further refined this by preventing models from bypassing visual cues. Chen’s research focus has long been on complex information understanding and reasoning. His background—including a PhD at UC Santa Barbara, research at Google/DeepMind on Gemini, and now a role in Meta’s superintelligence lab—provides deep insight into model development and their potential weaknesses. His TIGER Lab also builds models (e.g., for video understanding and generation), ensuring his evaluation benchmarks are grounded in practical challenges. While AI headlines often spotlight company leaders and product launches, Chen’s work exemplifies the critical, behind-the-scenes contributions of researchers crafting the rigorous standards that define and drive progress in AI capabilities.

marsbit22m ago

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

marsbit22m ago

STRC Unpegged by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Turning?

STRC, the perpetual preferred stock of MicroStrategy, is experiencing a persistent de-pegging from its target par value of $100, with the discount recently widening to over 11%. This de-anchoring challenges the core design of STRC, which was intended as a stable, income-oriented security operating near $100. As a crucial funding engine for MicroStrategy's Bitcoin acquisition strategy, STRC's price reflects market confidence in the company's entire capital model. The company's "capital flywheel" relies on issuing STRC at or above $100 via an At-the-Market (ATM) program to raise cash for buying Bitcoin, thereby boosting company equity and theoretically supporting STRC's value. A monthly adjustable dividend mechanism was designed to maintain this peg. Despite raising the dividend to 11.5% and increasing payment frequency, the de-pegging persists. Market concerns extend beyond technical factors like leveraged arbitrage unwinding. Analysts point to MicroStrategy's limited cash reserves relative to its ~$1.7 billion annual dividend obligation for preferred shares. While the company counters that its vast Bitcoin holdings could cover decades of payments, this argument hinges on the potential need to sell Bitcoin—a shift from its longstanding "hodl" narrative. The company's recent sale of a small amount of BTC, framed as a test, amplified these liquidity and strategy concerns. If STRC remains discounted, impairing MicroStrategy's ability to raise cheap capital, fears may grow that the company could sell more Bitcoin to meet obligations. This scenario could transform MicroStrategy from a major market buyer into a potential seller, posing significant downside risk for Bitcoin. The re-pegging of STRC is thus a key indicator for the health of MicroStrategy's capital structure and its market impact.

Odaily星球日报36m ago

STRC Unpegged by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Turning?

Odaily星球日报36m ago

Silicon Valley's Most Sought-After New Role Has Emerged

Silicon Valley's New Most Wanted Job: The Rise of the Forward Deployment Engineer The AI industry is witnessing a significant shift. The focus has moved from developing cutting-edge models to deploying them effectively within enterprises. This has made the "Forward Deployment Engineer" (FDE) a critical and highly sought-after role at major firms like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. For the past three years, the industry prioritized model scientists. However, companies are now facing a harsh reality: purchasing powerful AI tools does not guarantee productivity gains or organizational change. The biggest hurdle is not the technology itself, but integrating it into complex legacy systems, workflows, and corporate cultures. This includes challenges like data silos, compliance requirements, and internal resistance. The FDE role, pioneered by Palantir Technologies, addresses this "last-mile" problem. FDEs are deployed on-site with clients for extended periods. Their job is to deeply understand the client's specific organizational structure, processes, and pain points, then tailor and implement the AI solution accordingly. They combine skills in technology, project management, and organizational change. A clear signal of this trend emerged in May 2026 when three AI giants made major moves. Anthropic launched a $1.5B joint venture for enterprise deployment. OpenAI formed an independent deployment subsidiary, DeployCo, with over $4B in commitments and acquired a deployment consultancy. Google Cloud's CEO publicly announced a large-scale recruitment drive for FDEs. This shift represents a fundamental change in the software business model: from selling tools to selling guaranteed outcomes. FDEs are the agents of this change, responsible for delivering a working system within the production environment, not just a demo. Real-world cases, such as challenges at Goldman Sachs (compliance barriers) and Target (internal cultural resistance), illustrate that the primary obstacles to AI adoption are organizational, not technical. An FDE's value lies in navigating these human and procedural complexities to facilitate a successful "AI migration." In essence, as core AI technology becomes more accessible and affordable, the true premium is shifting to the human expertise required to understand organizations and drive change—making the FDE role pivotal for the next phase of the AI revolution.

marsbit36m ago

Silicon Valley's Most Sought-After New Role Has Emerged

marsbit36m ago

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

World Cup as a Catalyst for Agentic Wallets: From Web2 to Web3 This article explores how the World Cup provides a real-world scenario for observing the evolution of digital wallets from simple asset managers towards "Agentic Wallets"—intelligent, AI-powered interfaces. Using the example of prediction markets like Polymarket, it illustrates how AI Agents can lower the barrier to Web3 interaction. Instead of navigating complex DApps, users can express intent in natural language (e.g., "I think Portugal will win") within platforms like Discord or web pages. The Agent then interprets this intent, finds the relevant market, and seamlessly guides the user through the on-chain transaction via their wallet. The core shift is from wallets as mere "function menus" for signing transactions to "intent interpreters" that understand user goals. The article highlights parallel developments in traditional finance, such as Mastercard's "Agent Pay" and WeChat Pay's AI tests, which focus on granting AI controlled, authorized, and auditable payment capabilities. This underscores a broader trend of AI entering the financial layer. However, the article emphasizes that the primary challenge for Agentic Wallets in Web3 is not automation but establishing clear security boundaries. Unlike traditional systems with chargebacks, on-chain transactions are often irreversible. Therefore, future wallets must ensure users retain ultimate control and comprehension. They need to transparently communicate an Agent's permissions, spending limits, authorized durations, and provide easy ways to pause or revoke access. The World Cup experiments represent early steps toward wallets that are not just applications but ubiquitous, intelligent interfaces that simplify Web3 while keeping users securely in control.

marsbit1h ago

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

marsbit1h ago

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

For years, the prevailing view has been that options struggle to gain traction in DeFi due to complexity, fragmented liquidity, and lack of natural demand compared to products like perpetual futures. However, a recent algorithmic stablecoin design proposed by Vitalik Buterin presents a different perspective, using options not as a standalone trading product, but as foundational infrastructure for other financial instruments. In this design, one unit of ETH is split into two components: a "stable" side (P) that retains value up to a specified strike price, and an "upside" side (N) that captures all appreciation above that strike. Combined, they always equal one ETH, eliminating debt, margin, and liquidation risks inherent in typical collateralized debt position (CDP) stablecoins. The stable component essentially mimics the payoff of a covered call option. To function as a stablecoin, this structure requires continuously rolling deep in-the-money calls, which introduces challenges like rollover slippage, predictable transaction flow vulnerable to front-running, and persistent liquidity needs. A core hurdle is finding consistent buyers for the leveraged ETH upside exposure (N). While it offers leverage without funding rates or liquidation, it must compete with simpler alternatives like direct call options or perpetuals. The system's scalability depends on a sustained demand for this specific form of leverage. The author draws parallels to their experience with Rysk, where earlier versions of DeFi options protocols struggled. The breakthrough came with Rysk V12, which aligns incentives: asset holders generate yield by selling covered calls against their holdings, while market makers efficiently acquire the desired option exposure. This demonstrates that options can find product-market fit when embedded as a risk distribution and pricing engine within structured products, stablecoins, or yield-generating assets, rather than marketed as a complex direct trading instrument. Vitalik's proposal reinforces this architectural approach—using fully collateralized, non-custodial, and physically settled options as a fundamental building block. The real opportunity for options in DeFi may lie not in becoming the next perpetual swap, but in powering the next generation of on-chain financial products.

marsbit2h ago

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

396 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片