Locked And Loaded: MicroStrategy Takes $200M Loan To Buy Bitcoin

BitcoinistPublished on 2022-03-30Last updated on 2022-03-30

Abstract

Software company MicroStrategy is read to buy the Bitcoin dip. According to a press release, the company took a $205...

Software company MicroStrategy is read to buy the Bitcoin dip. According to a press release, the company took a $205 million loan from Silvergate Bank, a financial solution provider for the crypto industry.
The company took the loan via MacroStrategy, a subsidiary created with the purpose of holding its parent company’s Bitcoin funds. As per the release, the $205 million loans were issued under the Silvergate Exchange Network (SEN) and its Leverage program and will mature on March 23, 2025.
The SEN was launched in 2020, the release clarified, to address the demand for BTC collateralized loans. The financial institution claims the program has seen great interest which suggests a growing demand for BTC-backed loans.
Michael Saylor, Chairman, and CEO at MicroStrategy said:
The SEN Leverage loan gives us an opportunity to further our position as the leading public company investor in bitcoin. Using the capital from the loan, we’ve effectively turned our bitcoin into productive collateral, which allows us to further execute against our business strategy.
As collateral, MacroStrategy used “certain Bitcoin” held by the subsidiary and secured with a custodian entity approved by both parties. In addition to buying BTC and increasing one of the largest private holdings by a company, MicroStrategy will use the loan to pay fees, interest, and related expenses.
Alan Lane, Chief Executive Officer at Silvergate said the following:
We’re thrilled to add MicroStrategy to our growing list of SEN Leverage borrowers. Their innovative approach to treasury management is an exceptional example of how institutions can utilize their bitcoin to support and grow their business.
MicroStrategy Rushes To Buy Bitcoin?
The price of BTC continues its upward trajectory as the news about MicroStrategy broke. The first crypto by market cap trades at $47,800 with a 16% profit in the past 7-days.

Bitcoin BTC BTCUSD

BTC with bullish momentum on the 4-hour chart. Source: BTCUSD Tradingview On social media, users discuss MicroStrategy’s potential impact on BTC’s price as some entities could attempt to front-run the software company. This could lead to extended bullish price action.
As mentioned, MicroStrategy is one of the largest BTC holders. Data from BitcoinTreasuries indicates the company holds over 125,000 BTC after investing around $2 billion.
The company has seen an increase in its competitors. Terra’s Luna Foundation Guard is set on becoming the biggest BTC holder and dethroning MicroStrategy.
The entity perceives BTC as pristine collateral and has already begun accumulating it. The objective is to protect the 19% APY offer by the Anchor Protocol, and hedge Terra’s native stablecoin against potential downside periods.
Do Kwon, co-founder at Terraform Labs, the company behind Terra’s development, has publicly challenged Saylor.
The Terra Protocol will be one of the largest holders of $BTC@saylor beware
— Do Kwon 🌕 (@stablekwon) March 2, 2022

Related Reads

Buying Discounted ETH, Which One to Choose: Bitmine or SharpLink?

The article compares two major ETH treasury companies, SharpLink and Bitmine, for investors seeking indirect ETH exposure via stocks during a bear market. Both hold significant ETH at similar cost bases (~$3,609 and ~$3,400 respectively) and face comparable percentage losses (>50%). Key differences lie in scale, valuation, and financing. Bitmine holds 5.7M ETH (4.7% of supply) with a ~$76B market cap and trades at only a ~6% discount to its net asset value (NAV). It has superior liquidity, aggressive financing (raising $19.2B in 11 months), and inclusion in the Russell 1000 index. However, its structure includes perpetual preferred stock with dividend costs, and past investors paid significant premiums, adding an extra layer of valuation risk. SharpLink holds ~887k ETH, has a ~$10.2B market cap, and trades at a deeper ~21% discount to NAV. Its financing has been slower, relying on smaller offerings. It promotes an "institutional narrative" with ties to Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin and RWA/tokenization plans, though these remain unimplemented. Its liquidity is lower, but its simpler capital structure means current investors aren't paying for past overvaluation. In summary: For tactical trading in a downturn, Bitmine offers better liquidity and tighter NAV pricing. For potential long-term upside if ETH recovers, SharpLink's deeper discount offers more theoretical repair room, though it faces execution risks. The choice depends on whether one prioritizes trading efficiency and scale (Bitmine) or a potentially larger discount and simpler structure (SharpLink).

链捕手58m ago

Buying Discounted ETH, Which One to Choose: Bitmine or SharpLink?

链捕手58m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片